Going Galt: More Americans Vote with their Feet against Obama

Origanalist

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
43,054
As always, Daniel J. Mitchell's columns are filled with links.

I’ve written many times about how investors, entrepreneurs, small business owners and other successful people migrate from high-tax states to low-tax states.

Well, the same thing happens internationally, as France’s greedy politicians are now learning.

It’s a lot harder for Americans to escape our tax system, though, in part because of reprehensible exit taxes that are disturbingly reminiscent of some of the awful policies of past totalitarian regimes.

But it still happens, and that’s a very damning indictment of Obamanomics and a worrying referendum on the future of the United States. Here are some blurbs from a recent Fortune article.

Americans are ditching their U.S. passports in record numbers, a sign of growing frustration with a system that taxes U.S. citizens on their global wealth whether they live in Montana or Mongolia. …on the list, published quarterly by the Internal Revenue Service, is Isabel Getty, the daughter of jet-setting socialite Pia Getty and Getty oil heir Christopher Getty. In total, more than 670 U.S. passport holders gave up their citizenship — and with it, their U.S. tax bills — in the first three months of this year. That is the most in any quarter since the I.R.S. began publishing figures in 1998. And it is nearly three-quarters of the total number for all of 2012, a year in which the wealthy songwriter-socialite Denise Rich (christened “Lady Gatsby” by Yachting magazine) and Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin joined more than 932 other Americans in tossing their passports. …Expatriations first picked up pace in 2010, when more than 1,530 Americans dumped their passports.

The problem is particularly serious for Americans who live and work overseas. The United States is one of the few nations (and the only developed nation) to have “worldwide” taxation, which means overseas Americans have to pay tax to the IRS as well as to the nation where they live.



And thanks to laws such as “FATCA,” that burden just became far more onerous.

While dumping citizenship may seem unpatriotic or smack of tax avoidance to some critics, tax lawyers blame the byzantine complexity of American tax regulations. The rules “are confusing, complex, and so complicated that even Americans with good intentions can easily find themselves running afoul of the law,” said Jeffrey Neiman, a former federal prosecutor who was involved in the government’s offshore banking probe and is now in private practice in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. “This very well may explain why we are seeing a record number of Americans renouncing their United States citizenship.”

No wonder more and more people are escaping Obamanomics.

The good news, by the way, is that Senator Rand Paul has introduced legislation to repeal the worst parts of FATCA.

But that’s not going to happen while Obama’s still in the White House, so let’s focus on the Americans who are “going Galt.”

I have mixed feelings about these rich people. Many of them did nothing to help the fight for liberty while they were U.S. citizens.

And notwithstanding my post about where I would go if America suffers a Greek-style fiscal collapse, I suspect I’ll stay in the United States and fight until my last breath. So I get a little bit irked that they escape and leave the rest of us to deal with the mess created by our political elite.

Nonetheless, I strongly believe that all individuals have the right to protect themselves from predatory government.

And when you add up the various forms of double taxation in the internal revenue code (particularly the death tax), it makes little sense for families with high net worth to stay in the United States when there are many jurisdictions around the world that will welcome them with open arms.

In other words, let’s not blame the victims and castigate Americans who redomicile in jurisdictions with better tax policy. Let’s fix the awful internal revenue code with a flat tax.

P.S. I’m ashamed to admit that France has a more pro-liberty policy on tax migration than the United States.

P.P.S. But that may not last too long. Other nations are looking to copy America’s disgraceful worldwide tax approach.

http://finance.townhall.com/columni...-their-feet-against-obama-n1593195/page/full/
 
Are 1,000 people a lot considering the US population of 311 million? How does that compare to the numbers of people going the other direction (coming to the US)?
 
Are 1,000 people a lot considering the US population of 311 million? How does that compare to the numbers of people going the other direction (coming to the US)?

It's a lot more than there used to be, and those 1,000 are likely to all be very wealthy individuals taking their money and leaving the country with it.
 
http://business.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/01/report-half-of-chinas-rich-want-to-leave/

Report: Half of China’s millionaires want to leave

Posted by:
CNN, Tian Shao

Beijing (CNN) – Nearly half of Chinese millionaires are thinking about leaving the country, while 14% have or are in the process of applying for emigration, according to a Hurun Research Institute and the Bank of China report.

Their joint “Private Banking White Paper 2011” talked to individuals with assets of more than 10 million yuan (US$1.57 million) in18 cities to find out how China’s super rich manage their wealth. The average asset holdings of the 980 surveyed are 60 million yuan (US$9.44 million), with the average age of 42.

Where do China’s millionaires want to move? North America is the top choice. The United States is the most popular immigration destination for Chinese millionaires, attracting 40% of the respondents who are interested in leaving China, followed closely by Canada (37%) followed by Singapore and Europe.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/b...location-studies-say.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
It’s an article of faith among low-tax advocates that income tax increases aimed at the rich simply drive them away. As Stuart Varney put it on Fox News: “Look at what happened in Britain. They raised the top tax rate to 50 percent, and two-thirds of the millionaires disappeared in the next tax year. Same things are happening in France. People are leaving where the top tax rate is 75 percent. Same thing happened in Maryland a few years ago. New millionaire’s tax, the millionaires disappeared. You’ve got exactly the same thing in California.”

That, at least, is what low-tax advocates want us to think, and on its face, it seems to make sense. But it’s not the case. It turns out that a large majority of people move for far more compelling reasons, like jobs, the cost of housing, family ties or a warmer climate. At least three recent academic studies have demonstrated that the number of people who move for tax reasons is negligible, even among the wealthy.

Cristobal Young, an assistant professor of sociology at Stanford, studied the effects of recent tax increases in New Jersey and California.

“It’s very clear that, over all, modest changes in top tax rates do not affect millionaire migration,” he told me this week. “Neither tax increases nor tax cuts on the rich have affected their migration rates.”

The notion of tax flight “is almost entirely bogus — it’s a myth,” said Jon Shure, director of state fiscal studies at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonprofit research group in Washington. “The anecdotal coverage makes it seem like people are leaving in droves because of high taxes. They’re not. There are a lot of low-tax states, and you don’t see millionaires flocking there.”

Despite the allure of low taxes, Mr. Depardieu hasn’t been seen in Russia since picking up his passport and seems to be hedging his bets by maintaining a residence in Belgium. Meanwhile, Russian billionaires are snapping up trophy properties in high-tax London, New York and Beverly Hills, Calif.

“I don’t hear about many billionaires moving to Moscow,” said Robert Tannenwald, a lecturer in economic policy at Brandeis University and former Federal Reserve economist. Along with Nicholas Johnson, he and Mr. Shure are co-authors of “Tax Flight Is a Myth,” a 2011 research paper.

Of course, some people do move for tax reasons, especially wealthy retirees, athletes and other celebrities without strong ties to high-tax locations, like jobs and families. In renouncing his French citizenship, Mr. Depardieu follows other French celebrities, the chef Alain Ducasse, the singer Johnny Hallyday and Yannick Noah, a former tennis star. Several Paris hedge fund managers have decamped to London and the fashion mogul Bernard
 
Last edited:
I've never met a person that wants to pay more taxes or suffer more regulations. I have met quite a few that want others to do so.
 
The Chinese millionaires want into America because they're turning this country into their slave colony. Anyone else should want to get the hell out of here as fast as possible although I am not sure if anywhere else would be any better.
 
The Chinese millionaires want into America because they're turning this country into their slave colony. Anyone else should want to get the hell out of here as fast as possible although I am not sure if anywhere else would be any better.

This is the freest place in the industrialized world. Why would someone want to be substantially less free? I don't get it. I like living in New Hampshire. I like freedom. I don't want to live somewhere substantially less free. Of course, I voted with my feet, went galt and am happy about it.
 
Are 1,000 people a lot considering the US population of 311 million? How does that compare to the numbers of people going the other direction (coming to the US)?

Don't be obtuse. It isn't flattering.

The statement is clearly meant that the RATE is increasing and that is what is characterized as growing largely, not the absolute numbers.

What those silly people ignore is that as we trundle merrily toward global governance their ability to escape diminishes until the day will come when even those inbreds populating Pitcairn island will have the IRS or perhaps the G[obal]RS up their colons looking for loot.

Running away is not the answer because there is no place to which one may repair for safety and freedom. Standing your ground and fighting Themme is the only viable solution if freedom is the goal, but once again we see the symptoms of SFNS (Something For Nothing Syndrome). They want to be free, retain their presumably honestly earned wealth, but will not stand their ground and risk what needs to be risked in order to have it on a SOVEREIGN BASIS. Instead, they run like thieves and hence live as fugitives. How nuttystupid is that?

Unless you are heeled for Mars to be the first, get their, claim it, and hold the means to defend it against all comers, running away is a non-starter because you can never escape Themme. But if you kill Themme... now you may be speaking some intelligence.
 
Point being while there has been an increase in numbers, they are still pretty insignificant.
 
Back
Top