Front Page Washington Post article today

[Suzu]

The guy does have a point there. Barack has 2.8 million channel views while we have 654,000.

The statement "No GOP candidate comes close" is still highly inaccurate. Obama started off with "name recognition" and had a youtube presence six months before Ron Paul did. I watched a few Obama clips back then and was going to support him, until I found out about Dr. Paul.

What that article has done - and I tend to think it was intended that way - is cause Obama's number of subscribers to increase at a faster rate than Dr. Paul's.

Do you still think he handled it fairly?

 

[Hawaii Libertarian]

What's the Significance?

To give the devil his due, we all honestly need to look at the statistics together and not in isolation. Many could theoretically subscribe to Dr. Paul on YouTube, but if they're not watching the videos, is is really significant?

Some of the latest "scientific" polls shows Hillary with a double digit lead over Obama, so I suppose his supporters in the MSM will do all they can to pump some energy into a sagging campaign and his grass roots activists would certainly be expected to take a few pages from our playbook and improve his online presence.