Former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer Says He Fears “Massive Depopulation” Through Mass Vax

[James_Madison_Lives]

Former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer Says He Fears “Massive Depopulation” Through Mass Vax

Dr. Mike Yeadon has always been a carefully worded critic of lockdowns and covid government policies, preferring explanations of official incompetence and cluelessness to "conspiracy theories." This is a marked change in his tone, and a terrifying clarion call, nothing less. Build the laws in your state now to prevent martial law. Yeadon joins former Gates Foundation vaccine scientist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, with whom he has scientific disagreements, but gets to the same conclusion. Halt the mass "vaccinations."


Former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer Says He Fears “Massive Depopulation” Through Mass ‘Vaccinations’

A a former Chief Science and VP for Pfizer, who has been known for choosing his words cautiously, now concludes, as the result of what appears to him to be a carefully orchestrated wall of falsehoods being played out by governments and media, that “we are in the presence of evil” and “dangerous products,” referring to the so-called COVID vaccines, which he calls biological “agents.”

Dr. Mike Yeadon was a Chief Science Officer and VP for the development of treatments for respiratory illnesses at Pfizer for 16 years. He now licenses biotechnology owned by his biotech start-up to companies such as Novartis.

After nearly a year of swatting away what he used to call “conspiracy theories,” Dr. Yeadon now warns against the mass vaccination agenda.

In a recent interview Dr. Yeadon said:

““In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.”

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.” READ MORE

https://conventionofstates.com/

Sign the Petition to Call for a
CONVENTION OF STATES
I support the Convention of States Project; a national effort to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution, restricted to proposing amendments that will impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and impose term limits on its officials and members of Congress.

 

[CaptUSA]

It's crazy what's going on with government/media narratives.

We all have viruses in our systems - the studies suggest 5 to thousands at any given time. Viruses are nature's way of spreading information about the world among the population of animals. When we receive novel information, this can be rejected by people with weakened immune systems. But it doesn't mean that the virus is "bad". The virus is just a piece of floating information waiting to be copied and handed off. Most viruses are beneficial, because they provide our bodies with information that allows our immune systems to fight other diseases. But even beneficial information can be harmful if your immune system is weakened.

A typical vaccine will introduce the information to your body in a weakened condition so that your body can replicate it with a reduced risk of harm. These new mRNA "vaccines" replicate the spike proteins to fool your immune system into believing it's already got the information and therefore will block your body from replicating it. Understandably, this is a simplification, but you get the idea. For that reason, ONLY the people at risk should be getting the "vaccine". Because we're preventing the healthy portion of the population from sharing the information. That's insanity.

Unless, potentially... if this virus was created in a lab and is not a naturally-occurring virus. If that's the case, there may be harm in getting artificial information. But most of the people jumping on the "vaccine" believe this is a naturally-occurring virus, which tells you they have zero understanding of what viruses are or what they do for us. If you are convinced that the virus was created in a lab, you still have the question of if it makes sense to inject and artificial "blocker" to prevent the artificial viral information...

In any case, the most important public health policy would be to increase the immune systems of the population through exercise, healthy eating and sunshine. Instead, we're lowering immune systems, with lockdowns, isolation, fear, confusion, and anxiety. The exact opposite of a sound public policy.

 

[James_Madison_Lives]

It's crazy what's going on with government/media narratives.

We all have viruses in our systems - the studies suggest 5 to thousands at any given time. Viruses are nature's way of spreading information about the world among the population of animals. When we receive novel information, this can be rejected by people with weakened immune systems. But it doesn't mean that the virus is "bad". The virus is just a piece of floating information waiting to be copied and handed off. Most viruses are beneficial, because they provide our bodies with information that allows our immune systems to fight other diseases. But even beneficial information can be harmful if your immune system is weakened.

A typical vaccine will introduce the information to your body in a weakened condition so that your body can replicate it with a reduced risk of harm. These new mRNA "vaccines" replicate the spike proteins to fool your immune system into believing it's already got the information and therefore will block your body from replicating it. Understandably, this is a simplification, but you get the idea. For that reason, ONLY the people at risk should be getting the "vaccine". Because we're preventing the healthy portion of the population from sharing the information. That's insanity.

Unless, potentially... if this virus was created in a lab and is not a naturally-occurring virus. If that's the case, there may be harm in getting artificial information. But most of the people jumping on the "vaccine" believe this is a naturally-occurring virus, which tells you they have zero understanding of what viruses are or what they do for us. If you are convinced that the virus was created in a lab, you still have the question of if it makes sense to inject and artificial "blocker" to prevent the artificial viral information...

In any case, the most important public health policy would be to increase the immune systems of the population through exercise, healthy eating and sunshine. Instead, we're lowering immune systems, with lockdowns, isolation, fear, confusion, and anxiety. The exact opposite of a sound public policy.

I caught a cold a couple days ago. Not sure what it was didn't care. Took extra zinc and D before bed. Slept a lot. I am fine.

Muscles a bit sore but maybe that's because I went for a run and a little gym.