Fentanyl Is Smuggled for U.S. Citizens By U.S. Citizens, Not Asylum Seekers

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,561
By David J. Bier
09/14/22

[snip]

.
.

Here are facts:

* Fentanyl smuggling is ultimately funded by U.S. consumers who pay for illicit opioids: nearly 99 percent of whom are U.S. citizens.

* In 2021, U.S. citizens were 86.3 percent of convicted fentanyl drug traffickers—ten times greater than convictions of illegal immigrants for the same offense.

* Over 90 percent of fentanyl seizures occur at legal crossing points or interior vehicle checkpoints, not on illegal migration routes, so U.S. citizens (who are subject to less scrutiny) when crossing legally are the best smugglers.

* The location of smuggling makes sense because hard drugs at ports of entry are about 97 percent less likely to be stopped than are people crossing illegally between them.

* Just 0.02 percent of the people arrested by Border Patrol for crossing illegally possessed any fentanyl whatsoever.

* The government exacerbated the problem by banning most legal cross border traffic in 2020 and 2021, accelerating a switch to fentanyl (the easiest‐​to‐​conceal drug).

* During the travel restrictions, fentanyl seizures at ports quadrupled from fiscal year 2019 to 2021. Fentanyl went from a third of combined heroin and fentanyl seizures to over 90 percent.

* Annual deaths from fentanyl nearly doubled from 2019 to 2021 after the government banned most travel (and asylum).

.
.
.

Conclusion

Border enforcement will not stop fentanyl smuggling. Border Patrol’s experience with marijuana smuggling may provide even clearer evidence for this fact. Marijuana is the bulkiest and easiest‐​to‐​detect drug, which is why it was largely trafficked between ports of entry. Despite doubling the Border Patrol and building a border fence in the 2000s in part to combat the trade, the only thing that actually reduced marijuana smuggling was U.S. states legalizing marijuana. It is absurd to believe that interdiction will be more effective against a drug that is orders of magnitude more difficult to detect.

The DEA plainly stated in 2020 that fentanyl “will likely continue to contribute to high numbers of drug overdose deaths in the United States” even with the ban on asylum and travel restrictions. But ending asylum or banning travel has been worse than useless. These policies are both directly and indirectly counterproductive: first directly by incentivizing more fentanyl smuggling and then indirectly by distracting from the true causes of the crisis.

My colleagues have been warning for many years that doubling down on these failed prohibition policies will lead to even worse outcomes, and unfortunately, time has repeatedly proven them correct. The only appropriate response to the opioid epidemic is treatment of addiction. But for this to be possible, the government must adopt policies that facilitate treatment and reduce the harms from addiction—most importantly deaths. To develop these policies, policymakers need to ignore the calls to blame foreigners for our problems.


Full article, stats and graphs:

https://www.cato.org/blog/fentanyl-smuggled-us-citizens-us-citizens-not-asylum-seekers
 
I just quickly scanned the article (at the link) and noticed the use of the term "asylum seekers", which is gaslighting libspeak. In the article is a hyperlink to "harm reduction", so I took a look at that, as well. Harm reduction programs are used in several big city shitholes and while I don't know the answer to this terrible problem (other than treatment which would require massive investment and staffing - not mention you have to want it for it to work) but it's not harm reduction programs which are enabling and lead to a worse crisis.

 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
I know it is a commie slant article but it proves a problem with illegals by pointing out 14 percent of fentan smugglers are illegals, Consider most illegals are never in contact with govt agents as citizens are and that problem is much larger mathematically. So in an effort to downplay it theyve shown it is huge. Todays big math tip , the population shouldnt have 14 percent ( or much more ) illegals bringing in lethal drugs for retarded white kids to kill themselves with, the invasion is certainly lowering the quality of life for those families . so it has to be decided if it is worth stopping , so far the border is still uncontrolled so the answer has been no. borders for my lands will be controlled and I may have to consider adding a buffer zone around that
 
Last edited:
PAF supporting the invasion and destruction of the US to replace its population and establish a Latin American Narcostate again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
I just quickly scanned the article (at the link) and noticed the use of the term "asylum seekers", which is gaslighting libspeak. In the article is a hyperlink to "harm reduction", so I took a look at that, as well. Harm reduction programs are used in several big city $#@!holes and while I don't know the answer to this terrible problem (other than treatment which would require massive investment and staffing - not mention you have to want it for it to work) but it's not harm reduction programs which are enabling and lead to a worse crisis.



Half the answer is shoot to kill at the border.
 
* Over 90 percent of fentanyl seizures occur at legal crossing points or interior vehicle checkpoints, not on illegal migration routes, so U.S. citizens (who are subject to less scrutiny) when crossing legally are the best smugglers.

Sounds a bit like wonky word-games to me.

U.S. Citizens are the best smugglers because they use legal crossing points, where 90% of drug seizures occur.

I can amend it just a bit, to show how silly it is:

U.S. Citizens are the best bank-robbers, because they only rob banks right next door to police stations, so their robberies get foiled 90% of the time.

[LOL wut? Is the author trying to make the case that people should, or shouldn't be crossing at legal entry points?]
 
Last edited:
Would heroin addicts prefer fentanyl or fentanyl laced products over quality grade opiates?

Is the fentanyl crisis a byproduct of the war on opiates?

Do drug addicts prefer the zombie horse tranq over quality grade opiates?
 
There is no such thing as illegals.

Everyone is welcome to become American now.
 
The article writer is so fucking dumb, and the person that posted/believes it. The cartels use the flood of migrants to overwhelm the points of entry and the areas between so border patrol and customs have less resources to stop their drug running. And citing how much drugs they do stop is irrelevant to the massive volume they FAIL to stop that is killing our country.
 
quote-when-you-have-war-whether-it-s-a-war-against-drugs-war-against-terrorism-war-overseas-ron-paul-143-67-13.jpg
 
Cato. LOL.

Your beltway "libertarian" source for studies to push the globalist, corporatist establishment agenda.

They should combine their suggestions for implanting chips in humans with immigration. Every immigrant gets a chip implanted at the border, and they instantly become American citizens with all the privileges and no responsibilities (for now).
 
Cato. LOL.

Your beltway "libertarian" source for studies to push the globalist, corporatist establishment agenda.

They should combine their suggestions for implanting chips in humans with immigration. Every immigrant gets a chip implanted at the border, and they instantly become American citizens with all the privileges and no responsibilities (for now).

I don’t embrace Left-versus-Right march-in-lock-step like you do. You're the furthest thing from a sovereign individual, so why should I be concerned about what you think?
 
I know it is a commie slant article but it proves a problem with illegals by pointing out 14 percent of fentan smugglers are illegals, Consider most illegals are never in contact with govt agents as citizens are and that problem is much larger mathematically. So in an effort to downplay it theyve shown it is huge. Todays big math tip , the population shouldnt have 14 percent ( or much more ) illegals bringing in lethal drugs for retarded white kids to kill themselves with, the invasion is certainly lowering the quality of life for those families . so it as to be decided if it is worth stopping , so far the border is still uncontrolled so the answer has been no. borders for my lands will be controlled and I may have to consider adding a buffer zone around that

Good point. 6.2 million illegals, migrants, whatever, have been let loose into the country since POTATUS took office. If "just" 14% are criminals, that's well over 800,000. Like the US doesn't have enough criminals among it's citizen population and needs more?
 
I don’t embrace Left-versus-Right march-in-lock-step like you do. ...

LOL. What in my quote was remotely left vs. right?

"Your beltway "libertarian" source for studies to push the globalist, corporatist establishment agenda."
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
LOL. What in my quote was remotely left vs. right?

"Your beltway "libertarian" source for studies to push the globalist, corporatist establishment agenda."

I just see the bigger picture. The left hand feeds the right hand which feeds the left. At that point, it doesn't matter from who or where articles come from, it is the ability to put the pieces of the puzzle together to see where it's headed.

There will always be overlap between globalist agendas, and the left-jackboot and the right-jackboot. As a person who embraces sovereign individualism, NAP, and TAXATION-THEFT, the only workable solution [that will never come about] is to stop all funding, and try to get others to understand this as well. So, to think or believe that I "support the globalist agenda" is simply wrong and absurd.
 
This not war on terrorism.

This not war on drugs.

This not war overseas.

This is an invasion of my home.

It's still a handy way to make people clamor for government to let them trade liberty for security.

Which is what Ron Paul said.

It's already working.

His warning is worth heeding.

There must be a way to solve this problem without winding up, in Franklin's estimation, deserving neither security nor liberty.
 
Back
Top