Exclusive: The Spanish Influenza Epidemic Of 1918 Was Caused By Vaccinations

[donnay]

Exclusive: The Spanish Influenza Epidemic Of 1918 Was Caused By Vaccinations

Published on October 15, 2013 in Overall Health by Get Holistic Health

As has been stated before, all medical and non-medical authorities on vaccination agree that vaccines are designed to cause a mild case of the diseases they are supposed to prevent. But they also know and admit that there is no way whatsoever to predict whether the case will be mild or severe – even deadly. With this much uncertainty in dealing with the very lives of people, it is very unscientific and extremely dangerous to use such a questionable procedure as vaccination.

Many vaccines also cause other diseases besides the one for which they are given. For instance, smallpox vaccine often causes syphilis, paralysis, leprosy, and cancer. Polio shots, diphtheria toxin-antitoxin, typhoid vaccine, as well as measles, tetanus and all other shots often cause various other stages of disease such as post-vaccinal encephalitis (inflammation of the brain,) paralysis, spinal meningitis, blindness, cancer (sometimes within two years,) tuberculosis, (two to twenty years after the shot,) arthritis, kidney disease, heart disease (heart failure sometimes within minutes after the shot and sometimes several hours later.) Nerve damage and many other serious conditions also follow the injections.

When several shots are given (different vaccines) within a few days or a few weeks apart, they often trigger intensified cases of all the diseases at once, because the body cannot handle such a large amount of deadly poison being injected directly into the bloodstream. The doctors call it a new disease and proceed to suppress the symptoms.

When poison is taken by the mouth, the internal defense system has a chance to quickly eject some of it by vomiting, but when the poisons are shot directly into the body, bypassing all the natural safeguards, these dangerous poisons circulate immediately throughout the entire body in a matter of seconds and keep on circulating until all the cells are poisoned.

I heard that seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. This was in an army camp, so I wrote to the Government for verification. They sent me the report of U.S. Secretary of War, Henry L. Stimson. The report not only verified the report of the seven who dropped dead from the vaccines, but it stated that there had been 63 deaths and 28,585 cases of hepatitis as a direct result of the yellow fever vaccine during only 6 months of the war. That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given the soldiers. We can imagine the damage that all these shots did to the men. (See the chapter on What Vaccinations Did to Our Soldiers.)

The first World War was of a short duration, so the vaccine makers were unable to use up all their vaccines. As they were (and still are) in business for profit, they decided to sell it to the rest of the population. So they drummed up the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history. There were no epidemics to justify it so they used other tricks. Their propaganda claimed the soldiers were coming home from foreign countries with all kinds of diseases and that everyone must have all the shots on the market.

The people believed them because, first of all, they wanted to believe their doctors, and second, the returning soldiers certainly had been sick. They didn’t know it was from doctor-made vaccine diseases, as the army doctors don’t tell them things like that. Many of the returned soldiers were disabled for life by these drug-induced diseases. Many were insane from postvaccinal encephalitis, but the doctors called it shell shock, even though many had never left American soil.

The conglomerate disease brought on by the many poison vaccines baffled the doctors, as they never had a vaccination spree before which used so many different vaccines. The new disease they had created had symptoms of all the diseases they had injected into the man. There was the high fever, extreme weakness, abdominal rash and intestinal disturbance characteristic of typhoid. The diphtheria vaccine caused lung congestion, chills and fever, swollen, sore throat clogged with the false membrane, and the choking suffocation because of difficulty in breathing followed by gasping and death, after which the body turned black from stagnant blood that had been deprived of oxygen in the suffocation stages. In early days they called it Black Death. The other vaccines cause their own reactions — paralysis, brain damage, lockjaw, etc.

When doctors had tried to suppress the symptoms of the typhoid with a stronger vaccine, it caused a worse form of typhoid which they named paratyphoid. But when they concocted a stronger and more dangerous vaccine to suppress that one, they created an even worse disease which they didn’t have a name for. What should they call it? They didn’t want to tell the people what it really was — their own Frankenstein monster which they had created with their vaccines and suppressive medicines. They wanted to direct the blame away from themselves, so they called it Spanish Influenza. It was certainly not of Spanish origin, and the Spanish people resented the implication that the world-wide scourge of that day should be blamed on them. But the name stuck and American medical doctors and vaccine makers were not suspected of the crime of this widespread devastation — the 1918 Flu Epidemic. It is only in recent years that researchers have been digging up the facts and laying the blame where it belongs.

Some of the soldiers may have been in Spain before coming home, but their diseases originated in their own home-based U.S. Army Camps. Our medical men still use that same dodge. When their own vaccines (required for travel) cause vaccine diseases abroad they use this as grounds for a scare campaign to stampede people into the vaccination centers. Do you remember the Hong Kong Flu and the Asian Flu and the London Flu scares? These were all medically-made epidemics mixed with the usual common colds which people have every year.

Now (1976) we are being worked on again by the vaccine -epidemic makers in their effort to force another multi million dollar vaccine sale caper. Their con men have already talked President Ford into handing over $135 million dollars to start their vaccine racket. Even the insurance companies refused to become involved with such an obviously dangerous and crooked scheme. So, again the medical and drug con men induced the appropriate government officials to guarantee insurance against the, possible billions of dollars in law suits which could be brought against the vaccine promoters if the vaccine campaign is carried out as planned. It’s a good thing Ford was voted out of office. It’s too bad he wasn’t “dumped” before he paid the poison squad the MONEY’ to poison the whole population. However, we don’t yet know if President Carter will be any better. Will he be held in the grip of the medical and drug dictatorship? Or will he investigate — learn the truth — reverse the decisions and make the vaccine makers return the money taken from the taxpayers under false pretenses?

The statement of the swine flu vaccine promoters to the effect that the vaccine is harmless, is false, and the statement that it will protect against flu is false. Fifty-six people died after the shots, some within 48 hours. There is confusion and disagreement among the doctors about all aspects of the vaccine, from the safety and effectiveness to the necessity for it, who should have it and who should be warned against it.

Their scare-head campaign cry is that the swine flu is like the 1918 flu which killed 20,000,000 people. They don’t have any usable and provable blood samples from the 1918 flu epidemic to prove it. That was 58 years ago, and the doctors were just as confused and inefficient then as now. However, one thing is certain — the 1918 Spanish Influenza was a vaccine-induced disease caused by extreme body poisoning from the conglomeration of many different vaccines. The soldiers at Fort Dix who were said to have had Swine Flu had been injected with a large variety of vaccines like the vaccines which caused the 1918 flu epidemic. The flu epidemic at Fort Dix was in no way related to swine. There were no swine at camp (unless we want to sarcastically call the vaccine promoters who caused the diseases -“swine.”)

To add to the confusion, the doctors tell the people that there are a lot of various kinds of flu; the one which the soldiers at Fort Dix had was AVictoria flu, there are other strains of flu virus, and also, that the swine flu vaccine which so many people have taken already will not protect them against the many other types of flu. This will be used as an “out” in case of law suits later on when more casualties begin to show up. The doctors will say that the vaccine failed because it was the wrong kind of flu for the vaccine. Of course, no one can prove it one way or the other because viruses are illusive, invisible organisms which are unstable and unpredictable. One dictionary definition of virus is “a morbid poison.” The vaccines injected into the body are poison and cause the typical poison reactions. Virus (poison) does not fly around and attack people.

Therefore, there will be no swine flu epidemic unless the vaccine promoters make one like they did in the 1918 flu epidemic. It will not kill 20,000,000 people unless the people submit to the disease-producing shots. There are also, other causes of disease besides vaccines, such as bad food, which has been devitalized and contaminated with poison preservatives and artificial drug concoctions. There are many more causes of disease but no diseases are contagious.

Vaccine drives come and go as often as the vaccine promoters can cook up the slightest pretense of a reason.n Back in1957 they were trying to stir up a vaccination campaign for what they decided to call Asiatic flu. An editorial in the Herald and Express for August 29, 1957 was captioned, “Fear of Flu Propaganda.” Part of the piece is as follows:

“What a tempest in a teapot has been blown up over the probability that this country will experience an epidemic of the Asiatic flu in the fall and winter months ahead.

“Even the United States Department of Health is stooge for the panic — and has issued statements which are frightening the public, rather than reassuring them by pointing out that this epidemic, while widespread, gives no indication of being any more dangerous than our usual flood of influenza-like colds when winter comes on.

“Those who read between the lines even wonder whether the whole thing might not be a bit of super salesmanship on the part of those who are making and selling the vaccines which are being prepared.. . .”


Read more at: http://www.getholistichealth.com/37...-epidemic-of-1918-was-caused-by-vaccinations/

 

[Acala]

The small pox vaccine causes syphilis?

The level of ignorance in that assertion is almost incomprehensible.

 

[Zippyjuan]

I heard that seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated.

"I heard"- very reliable source. "Dropped dead"- of what causes?

That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given the soldiers.

There weren't "14- 25" different vaccines even available in 1918.

I heard that seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. This was in an army camp, so I wrote to the Government for verification. They sent me the report of U.S. Secretary of War, Henry L. Stimson. The report not only verified the report of the seven who dropped dead from the vaccines, but it stated that there had been 63 deaths and 28,585 cases of hepatitis as a direct result of the yellow fever vaccine during only 6 months of the war. That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given the soldiers. We can imagine the damage that all these shots did to the men. (See the chapter on What Vaccinations Did to Our Soldiers.)

The first World War was of a short duration, so the vaccine makers were unable to use up all their vaccines. As they were (and still are) in business for profit, they decided to sell it to the rest of the population. So they drummed up the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history. There were no epidemics to justify it so they used other tricks. Their propaganda claimed the soldiers were coming home from foreign countries with all kinds of diseases and that everyone must have all the shots on the market.

Impossible for people in WWI to have gotten anything from a yellow fever vaccine. One was not even developed until 1936- almost 20 years later. During WWI they fought yellow fever by trying to deal with the source- controlling mosquitos. There was no vaccine at the time.

1936 - Max Theiler Develops Yellow Fever Vaccine

Max Theiler and his colleagues developed a live attenuated vaccine for yellow fever using tissue cultures prepared from embryonated chicken eggs. Among the many subcultures of the yellow fever virus in the laboratory, the one designated “17D” was used, giving the vaccine its name. He published results of U.S. vaccine trials in humans in 1937. The vaccine was easily adapted for mass production and became the universal standard.

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/yellow-fever

Story has some serious problems with facts.

So they drummed up the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history.

Largest vaccination campaign in US history? Not even close.

Total, non-factual propaganda piece.

 

[donnay]

Smallpox vaccine virus' curious relationship to syphilis

by Don Harkins

The virus in the smallpox vaccine is called the vaccinia virus. Historical references clearly illustrate the origin of the vaccinia virus. However, modern science claims its presence is a “mystery” and poses five theories, none of which have been proven, in an attempt to explain the origin of this virus.

The five theories 21st century science offers are that the vaccinia virus is: 1. derived from variola virus by passage in cows; 2. derived from variola virus by passage in humans (variolation); 3. derived through hybridisation between cowpox and variola viruses; 4. a fossil virus maintained in the laboratory but otherwise extinct; 5. derived from cowpox virus by repeated passage on the skin of animals (Fenner, 1992; Behbehani, 1983).

Not one of the five theories even consider the well-documented contents of 19th century books such as “Cowpox and Vaccinal Syphilis,” by Dr. Charles Creighton (1891), a professor of microscopic anatomy at Cambridge University.

It is not difficult to understand why the government-supported public health community prefers to keep the public in the dark about the most likely origins of vaccinia. The truth is disgusting and reminiscent of modern medicine's “eye-of-newt, spleen-of-bat, Dark Ages medicine roots. If the public was told vaccinia was the product of sores that developed on the irritated udders of cows milked by the syphilitic hands of 18th century milk maidens, they may be less inclined to stand in line for a smallpox vaccination.

In 1796, when the father of modern vaccinology Ed Jenner “discovered” the smallpox vaccine, the serum-making process was crude and amazingly nonscientific. With a little background, a layperson can easily understand what happened.

Dr. Creighton, who also wrote “Epidemics of Great Britain (1893),” observed that cowpox (vaccinia) is, “an eruption of a few pimples which are made to bleed by the merciless manipulations of the milkers...The blood forms crusts that are dislodged every six hours, the indurated [hardened], phagendemic [rapidly spreading] ulcers form on the sites of the original pimples...Cowpox undisturbed by the milkers' hands, has no existence in the originating cow. It is the persistent irritation that makes it a pox.”

In other words, at the time smallpox vaccine was being observed, it was understood that cow milkers with syphilitic hands caused pox-like sores on the udders of cows. Secretions from this diseased material were then taken from the cow, mixed with various compounds and rendered into a preparation. This material was then administered to persons by applying it to broken skin.

Read more: http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20030102.htm

 

[erowe1]

The "Exclusive:" at the beginning of that headline tells us right away that the whole article is going to be baseless.

What actual factual proof of the assertion could some shmoe at getholistichealth.com have access to?

 

[donnay]

"I heard"- very reliable source. "Dropped dead"- of what causes?



There weren't "14- 25" different vaccines even available in 1918.



Impossible for people in WWI to have gotten anything from a yellow fever vaccine. One was not even developed until 1936- almost 20 years later.



http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/yellow-fever

Story has some serious problems with facts.

After the Spanish-American War, yellow fever in the notoriously endemic Cuba became a particularly American concern. Sanitation measures in Havana (i.e., eliminating the “miasmas” with sewage disposal, clean water, and overall cleanliness) failed to curb the rising incidence. Consequently, Sternberg, as U.S. surgeon general, appointed a Yellow Fever Commission, headed by Walter Reed, to investigate. This famous commission, through careful experiments, established that mosquitoes transmitted the disease and the agent was filterable through a Berkefeld filter, excluding a bacterial agent [3,4]. Bacteria-based vaccines quickly became extinct. Many attempts to infect laboratory animals failed, however, leaving the scientific community without a laboratory model. An attempt to bypass this difficulty was made in 1901, when Dr. John Guiteras, based in Havana, noted the low mortality in the Walter Reed experiments (14 inoculations and no deaths) and attempted to immunize subjects with a tiny dose (one to four mosquito bites each) of live agent. Unfortunately eight out of 42 volunteers became ill, and three died [5]. Further work on immunization came to a halt, and most attention henceforth focused on prevention through mosquito control.

When the Panama Canal opened in 1912, large “unseasoned” populations around the world were suddenly liable to exposure. The Rockefeller Foundation’s International Health Commission resolved to assist in yellow fever eradication, and in 1918, a team was dispatched to Guayaquil, Ecuador, a residual endemic center, to implement control measures. The team included Hideyo Noguchi. Noguchi, born in Japan, had risen from extreme poverty to earn a medical degree and eventually a position at the Rockefeller Institute. He already had distinguished himself by the discovery of spirochetes in brain tissue of paretics. Noguchi was aware of another spirochete, Leptospira icterohemorrhagiae, as the cause of Weil’s disease. There was speculation that Weil’s disease and yellow fever might be identical or closely related diseases, and Noguchi sought spirochetes in Ecuador. He found some in the livers of “yellow fever” patients and was able to pass them easily to guinea pigs. He felt he had discovered the causative agent of yellow fever and strongly implied this in several publications [6,7,8]. He named the new spirochete Leptospira icteroides and claimed to be able to distinguish it serologically from L. icterohemorrhagicae [9]. In short order, he produced a vaccine and antiserum against yellow fever, both manufactured at the Rockefeller Institute, and used quite extensively in the United States, Latin America, and French African colonies [10]. The vaccine also was available in New York City for travelers (the first travel medicine clinic?) [11]. Noguchi published “successful” results on 7,964 vaccinations [12,13]. But seasoned investigators could not duplicate his results, and doubts grew [14]. The sloppy statistics of the vaccine trials, the established easy filterability of the causative agent, and the inability of others to infect laboratory animals were facts that Noguchi could not explain away [15].

Then, in 1926, Max Theiler, born in South Africa and son of a veterinarian, and Andrew Watson Sellards showed that the L. icteroides obtained from Noguchi was serologically identical with L. icterhemorrhagica [16]. In that same year, the Rockefeller Foundation quietly discontinued its distribution of the vaccine, and there was no alternate candidate.
Go to:
Africa activities, isolation of virus, and a new host

After World War I, the Rockefeller Foundation expanded its yellow fever activities to Africa. The second West African Yellow Fever Commission was formed in 1925 (a prior commission in 1920 had accomplished little). The tense and tragic story of this expedition has been told many times [17,18,19,20], and only brief comments will be made here. The expedition, based near Lagos, was to determine whether African yellow fever was the same as yellow fever in South America, to find the causative agent (including further search for Leptospira), and to study its epidemiology. Major Henry Beeuwkes, a Hopkins-trained bacteriologist retired from the army, led the expedition. He was joined by Adrian Stokes, a London-based professor of pathology who was an expert on leptospirosis, and others.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892770/

 

[angelatc]

I miss Amy. The PM's over this crap were priceless.

 

[Acala]

Smallpox vaccine virus' curious relationship to syphilis

by Don Harkins

The virus in the smallpox vaccine is called the vaccinia virus. Historical references clearly illustrate the origin of the vaccinia virus. However, modern science claims its presence is a “mystery” and poses five theories, none of which have been proven, in an attempt to explain the origin of this virus.

The five theories 21st century science offers are that the vaccinia virus is: 1. derived from variola virus by passage in cows; 2. derived from variola virus by passage in humans (variolation); 3. derived through hybridisation between cowpox and variola viruses; 4. a fossil virus maintained in the laboratory but otherwise extinct; 5. derived from cowpox virus by repeated passage on the skin of animals (Fenner, 1992; Behbehani, 1983).

Not one of the five theories even consider the well-documented contents of 19th century books such as “Cowpox and Vaccinal Syphilis,” by Dr. Charles Creighton (1891), a professor of microscopic anatomy at Cambridge University.

It is not difficult to understand why the government-supported public health community prefers to keep the public in the dark about the most likely origins of vaccinia. The truth is disgusting and reminiscent of modern medicine's “eye-of-newt, spleen-of-bat, Dark Ages medicine roots. If the public was told vaccinia was the product of sores that developed on the irritated udders of cows milked by the syphilitic hands of 18th century milk maidens, they may be less inclined to stand in line for a smallpox vaccination.

In 1796, when the father of modern vaccinology Ed Jenner “discovered” the smallpox vaccine, the serum-making process was crude and amazingly nonscientific. With a little background, a layperson can easily understand what happened.

Dr. Creighton, who also wrote “Epidemics of Great Britain (1893),” observed that cowpox (vaccinia) is, “an eruption of a few pimples which are made to bleed by the merciless manipulations of the milkers...The blood forms crusts that are dislodged every six hours, the indurated [hardened], phagendemic [rapidly spreading] ulcers form on the sites of the original pimples...Cowpox undisturbed by the milkers' hands, has no existence in the originating cow. It is the persistent irritation that makes it a pox.”

In other words, at the time smallpox vaccine was being observed, it was understood that cow milkers with syphilitic hands caused pox-like sores on the udders of cows. Secretions from this diseased material were then taken from the cow, mixed with various compounds and rendered into a preparation. This material was then administered to persons by applying it to broken skin.

Read more: http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20030102.htm

Small pox is caused by a virus and syphilis is caused by a bacteria. You are more closely related to an aardvark than those two organisms are to each other. This is idiotic. Really. This is on the level of witchcraft.

 

[CPUd]

 

[donnay]

Small pox is caused by a virus and syphilis is caused by a bacteria. You are more closely related to an aardvark than those two organisms are to each other. This is idiotic. Really. This is on the level of witchcraft.

Do you read? I am sure you would have been one of those people who agreed that those people insane from ergot poisoning were witches too.

It is not difficult to understand why the government-supported public health community prefers to keep the public in the dark about the most likely origins of vaccinia. The truth is disgusting and reminiscent of modern medicine's “eye-of-newt, spleen-of-bat, Dark Ages medicine roots. If the public was told vaccinia was the product of sores that developed on the irritated udders of cows milked by the syphilitic hands of 18th century milk maidens, they may be less inclined to stand in line for a smallpox vaccination.

The Cowpox/Syphilis Connection
The darkest aspect of this story, however, is the true nature of “cow-pox.” According to Henry Valentine
Knaggs, a charter member of the British National Anti-Vaccination League and author of The Truth About
Vaccination (1914), “All authorities are agreed that cow-pox affects only cows that are yielding milk, and
therefore, need milking. It does not attack cows that are left alone with their calves, and bulls are exempt
from it. The fact that cow-pox owed its origin to a milker’s hand seems to have been the strongest point
raised by Jenner, for he has repeatedly asserted that “the only genuine cow-pox was that which was
conveyed to the cow’s teats by the hands of milkers.”

Knaggs further linked Jenner’s vaccine to syphilis. “A careful examination of the available data relating to
Jenner’s first inoculations with cow-pox matter direct from the cow, shows that he was quite unable to
produce a safe vaccine lymph from it which, after inoculation, was free from symptoms indistinguishable
from those of syphilis

http://www.vaccinationawareness.com.au/Images/Jenner-history.pdf

 

[Acala]

Do you read? I am sure you would have been one of those people who agreed that those people insane from ergot poisoning were witches too.

Ergotism is explained by science. The causative agent is known. Once upon a time the cause was not known. Now that it IS known, nobody thinks it is caused by evil spirits. Anyone who now proposed that ergotism is caused by evil spirits would rightly be considered an idiot. The cause of small pox by a virus is explained by science. The causative agent is known. Syphilis being caused by a specific bacterium is science. The causative agent is known. Syphilis being caused by the small pox vaccine is crazy superstition. It has no basis in science. In fact it flies so far against venerable scientific theories and is so devoid of any rational basis that it is nothing short of raving hysteria. I can't even muster the words needed to express just how ignorant it is and anyone who actually believes it has my deepest sympathy.

 

[specsaregood]

//

 

[donnay]

Ergotism is explained by science. The causative agent is known. Once upon a time the cause was not known. Now that it IS known, nobody thinks it is caused by evil spirits. Anyone who now proposed that ergotism is caused by evil spirits would rightly be considered an idiot. The cause of small pox by a virus is explained by science. The causative agent is known. Syphilis being caused by a specific bacterium is science. The causative agent is known. Syphilis being caused by the small pox vaccine is crazy superstition. It has no basis in science. In fact it flies so far against venerable scientific theories and is so devoid of any rational basis that it is nothing short of raving hysteria. I can't even muster the words needed to express just how ignorant it is and anyone who actually believes it has my deepest sympathy.

Dr. M. Ricord, one of the most noted authorities on syphilitic affections, in a lecture to medical men in Paris, said:

"At first I repelled the idea that syphilis could be transmitted by vaccination.

The recurrence of facts appearing more and more confirmatory, I accepted the possibility of this mode of transmission, I should say, with reserve, and even with repugnance; but today, in the face of all these facts I hesitate no more to proclaim their reality Who, pray, will run such a risk to escape smallpox?"

Dr Brundenell Carter, surgeon to St George s Hospital, London, observed: "I think that a large proportion of the cases of apparently inherited syphilis are in reality vaccinal; and that the syphilis in these cases does not show itself until the age of from eight to ten years, by which time the relation between cause (vaccination) and effect (syphilis) are lost sight of."

Dr. Ballard, one of the vaccine inspectors for the English government stated:

There can be no doubt that the vaccine virus and the syphilitic virus may both be drawn at the same time, upon the same instrument, from one and the same vesicle. The vesicle which is thus capable of furnishing both vaccine and syphilitic virus may present, prior to being opened, all the normal and fully developed characters of the true Jennerian vesicle as ordinarily met with"

In his book entitled COMPULSORY VACCINATION, from his years’ world wide research, Dr. J. M. Peebles (M.D., Ph.D.) gave an account of seventeen school girls who developed syphilis as a result of vaccination at Lebus, near Frankfort Yet the vaccinator’s report stated that the vaccinations were from the regular, official calf-lymph "absolutely pure, glycerinated, sterilized, all germs but the ‘vaccine sporule’, destroyed, hermetically sealed until used."

Protesting the vaccination laws in various cities he says:

"Think of it, fathers and mothers, who would bring your daughters up to be comely, chaste and pure, that your state and municipality should place you under absolute compulsion to observe a rite to taint these maidens with the disease against which civilization revolts."

Nichols adds, "At the present time little children are subject to the assault (with a deadly weapon—the poisoned needle) , and a healthy, unvaccinated child, in the eye of the law, is considered a nuisance and as dangerous at time of an epidemic as a mad dog."

"Viewed in this light," Nichols continues, (in his BLUNDER IN POISONS page 41) the blunder, perhaps of greater gravity than that of transmission of tuberculosis by vaccination, again becomes the crime; vaccination for mere business interest would be (and is) a deliberate assault on the health of a community, and the medical man committing the assault might well be termed ‘a perverter of common sense and an enemy of the human race’ ".

In THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION (35) Dr. J. W. Hodge writes:

"Think of the unparalleled absurdity of deliberately infecting the organism of a healthy child with the poisonous matter obtained from the sores of a sick animal, under the pretense of protecting the victim of the ingrafted disease, against the contagion of another disease.

"So-called successful vaccination is nothing less than the implanting into the body, the virulent products of diseased animal tissue, with the effect of inducing actual disease. The performance of such an operation, in the very nature of the case, violates every principle of modern aseptic surgery, the legitimate aim of which is to remove from the organism the products of disease and never to introduce them."

Professor Scott Tebb, in a treatise against compulsory vaccination stated:
"Once admitted that the risk of contracting venereal disease is real, and one which no amount of care can guard against even if vaccination were a preventive of smallpox, all ground for compulsion vanishes, for it then becomes a ground for personal responsibility, as in any other operation or treatment involving risk of life and health No surgeon would dream of administering chloroform or per-forming the most trivial operation without first gaining the patient’s consent, and therefore, no authority, whether medical or state, has the right to override the patient s scruples Compulsory vaccination is now beginning to be recognized, even by medical men, as a grievous and mischievous mistake, and I have not the slightest doubt that the profession would gladly relinquish it tomorrow, if their credit and prestige were not so deeply involved."

So enormous are the profits from vaccination that many efforts are made by members of the medical profession to minimize the dangers of syphilis caused by vaccination. One of these, Dr. Henry A. Martain, of Boston wrote a paper denying the possibility of syphilitic infection from this cause. The London Lancet (Medical Journal) in criticizing this paper said: "The notion that animal lymph would be free from chances of syphlitic contamination is so fallacious that we are surprised to see Dr. Martain reproduce it."

Professor Fournier said: "A real and serious danger incurred in vaccination is that every (vaccinated) individual is destined to undergo, one or several times in his life the danger of vaccinal syphilis. For myself alone, I have knowledge of two actual epidemics of this disease (vaccinal syphilis)".

ENCYCLOPEDIA ON VACCINAL SYPHILIS

In the Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition) under the heading "Smallpox— Cowpox," Dr. Charles Creighton says:

"The real affinity of cowpox is not to smallpox, but to the great pox (syphilis). The vaccinal roseola is not only very like the syphilitic roseola, but it means the same sort of thing. The vaccinal ulcer of everyday practice is, to all intents and purposes, a chancre (syphilitic ulcer)."

"The photographs, Fig. 1 and 2 show the marked similarity between the smallpox vaccination roseola and the syphilis ulcer.

In his voluminous work on vaccination Crookshank tells us that "Auzias Turenne, of France, was the first to point out that cowpox is analagous to syphilis; but even the earliest opponents of vaccination regarded the disease as "lues bovilla", (syphilis) and it had even been suggested that the cow had derived the complaint from milkers who were affected with syphilis. However, there is no more ground for believing in the latter theory than there is for believing that cowpox is produced by milkers suffering from smallpox.

It is the course which the malady runs which brings it so closely into relations with syphilis…….There appears to be very little doubt that syphilis may be transmitted by vaccination; but many cases which are attributed to syphilis are unquestionably the full effects of cowpox virus; and nothing could more clearly point to the analogy between the two diseases than the difficulty in diagnosing the exact nature of vaccinal accidents (diseases)".

"Again, if we study the effects of syphilis artificially inoculated on the human subject, the appearance in some cases are strikingly similar to inoculated horse-pox. Without entering into a prolonged discussion of this subject, I will refer, as an example, to the progress in Dr. Ricord’s cases of syphilization. As in inoculated horse-pox we have the stages of papule, vesicle, ulcer, scab and scar; and no one can compare his plates with Jenner’s without being struck with the similarity in their appearances. (See Fig. 2 and 3)

Fig. 3

"The results of the artificial inoculation of syphilis were unknown to Jenner, but if they had been he would scarcely have failed to have observed the likeness between them. So striking indeed are the appearances, that it is possible that. by judicious selection, a strain of syphilitic lymph might be cultivated which would produce in time, all the physical characteristics of the ‘vaccine’ vesicle."

MORE EVIDENCE

In THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION by J. W. Hodge, M.D. we read:

"To the scientific physician, conclusive evidence of the real affinity of cowpox is furnished at a glance, by the pathological diagnostic table of M. R. Leverson, M.D., Ph. D. . .. which was read before the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons at Indianapolis, (Jan. 1896) and has been unquestioned by the profession.

"The table which I now present to you, is a condensed statement in paralleled columns, of the primary and secondary symptoms of smallpox, cowpox and syphilis, from the separate descriptions of the most renowned authorities upon these several diseases. It shows an almost complete likeness between the two latter and the total unlikeness of each to (natural, uninduced) smallpox. Here we have some of the highest authorities who have produced the clearest evidence showing that vaccinia (vaccination disease) is modified syphilis. The chronic and protean manifestations which, at times, follow vaccination must have impressed us all with their close analogy to syphilitic lesions."

COMPARISON OF SMALLPOX, COWPOX AND SYPHILIS

SMALLPOX

1 — Eruption general, superficial.
2 — Constitutional or general symptoms precede the eruption and are relieved on appearance.
3 — Eruption first felt as a No. 8 bird shot beneath the skin, it then appears as a papule; then a vesicle, becoming pustular about the 5th or 6th day, is from one to three lines in length; but the pustules are of various kinds, irregular, elevated, generally perforated by a hair, induration, if any, very slight, no tendency to gnawing ulceration of the skin.
4 — The fluid is contained in two chambers — a superficial and a deep, which communicate around the edges of the separating membrane.
5 — The smallpox pustules leave no scar if properly treated.
6 — The smallpox eruption does not affect the lymphatic system.
7 — Infectious.
8 — Inoculable.
9 — The smallpox epidemic seems to be taking its rise in filthy locations. (also, when the body is contaminated with vaccines, drugs and incompatible foods and impure water, etc.)

COWPOX (vaccination) Primary Lesion

1. Eruption local, deep, in corium of skin or subcutaneous tissue or in mucous membrane.
2 — Constitutional symptoms do not precede but follow the eruption in all cases.
3 — Pustule (chancre) always the same, first a papule, then a vesicle, becoming pustular about the 8th day, 7 to 10 lines in diameter, round, centrally depressed, margin indurated and not perforated by a hair, has a cellular membrane at floor, tendency to gnawing ulceration.
4. The fluid is contained in a single chamber, reticulated, is non-volatile, and the infection is communicated only by immediate contact with an abraded surface.
5 — The cowpox leaves a foveated scar.
6 — The cowpox poison permeates the lymphatic channels and ganglia, causing inflammation, buboes, and abscesses.
7 — Not infectious.
8 — Inoculable.
9 — Cowpox is independent of time and place; communicated only by direct inoculation.

SYPHILIS or Greatpox

1 — Eruption local, deep, in the corium of skin or subcutaneous tissue, or in the mucous membrane.
2 — Constitutional symptoms do not precede but follow the eruption in all cases.
3 — Pustule always the same, first a papule rapidly becoming pustular without perceptibly passing through a vesicular stage, 7 to 10 lines in diameter, scooped out, deep funnel-shaped with sloping often elevated, .not perforated by a hair, has a fungoid membrane at floor, tendency to a gnawing ulceration.
4 — Absolutely the same as the cowpox.
5 — Similar to the scar of cowpox.
6 — Absolutely the same as the cowpox.
7 — Not infectious.
8 — Inoculable.
9 — Absolutely the same as cowpox.

http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean.html

 

[Zippyjuan]

http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean.html

A lot has changed in the 150 years since that article was written. Science has improved and much has been learned. Vaccines have changed a lot too. Ricord died in the 1800's.

ENCYCLOPEDIA ON VACCINAL SYPHILIS

In the Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition) under the heading "Smallpox— Cowpox," Dr. Charles Creighton says:

"The real affinity of cowpox is not to smallpox, but to the great pox (syphilis). The vaccinal roseola is not only very like the syphilitic roseola, but it means the same sort of thing. The vaccinal ulcer of everyday practice is, to all intents and purposes, a chancre (syphilitic ulcer)."

"The photographs, Fig. 1 and 2 show the marked similarity between the smallpox vaccination roseola and the syphilis ulcer.

Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition) was published in 1875. http://www.britannica.com/topic/Enc...lement-to-the-fourth-fifth-and-sixth-editions

That is some serious digging to find such out of date info to support a theory. I think I will go with more current research on the topic.

 

[TheCount]

A lot has changed in the 150 years since that article was written.

One of the many things that have changed: the M in M. Ricord stands for Monsieur. It is not his initial; his first name was Philippe. What level of "research" went into writing this if they can't get the guy's name right?

Doesn't help that the whole page it's a part of is a massive gish gallop of quote mining and barely related gibberish.