Donald Trump Calls Hillary Clinton a 'Bigot'

[nikcers]

It is to Hillary's advantage to create division. Obama has done it successfully.

How is this Hillarys fault, if its Hillarys fault then Trump is a pawn of the Clintons and Obama..Tell me this, I don't think Trump believed the birther crap as much as the next guy, but why did he do it if he didn't believe it? He was either campaigning for Mitt Romney by convincing people to vote for Mitt Romney or more likely he was campaigning for Obama, because people were inspired to vote for Obama against Trump to counter his racial narrative.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Whatever bridges Rand was trying to build were burned down by a loudmouth and his alt white fanboys about a month or 2 after he announced.

You know, I think Trump is probably going to be a lousy president, but I'm going to have to call B.S. on this one too. No bridges were built to anybody by Rand outside of Kentucky, when I speak to minorities in my area about Rand Paul, they don't say "Oh the guy who is in the same party as Donald Trump and all those alt. right types", they say "Oh, you mean the guy who criticized the Civil Rights Act and doesn't want me to have free money" or "Oh, you mean the guy who's dad said all that racist stuff in those newsletters".

I'm peeved beyond all recognition that Rand isn't going to be president because he was the only person who would have made any good and meaningful changes to this country's decaying government, but putting that on Trump and the alt. right is special education territory. Most of these die-hard minority Democrats are in it for the free stuff and the legal abortions, they couldn't care less about freedom as actual freedom comes with accountability which is something they don't want to deal with. Likewise, the media just says the word "racist" and the prospects of a decent guy like Paul (Rand or Ron) becoming president go to zero in seconds flat. Frankly, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for playing into that crap with Trump since you are now part of the problem.

How is this Hillarys fault, if its Hillarys fault then Trump is a pawn of the Clintons and Obama..Tell me this, I don't think Trump believed the birther crap as much as the next guy, but why did he do it if he didn't believe it? He was either campaigning for Mitt Romney by convincing people to vote for Mitt Romney or more likely he was campaigning for Obama, because people were inspired to vote for Obama against Trump to counter his racial narrative.

Hillary supporter number 3 confirmed here. Hillary started the birther thing, if you doubt this I suggest you look it up (just punch "Hillary Clinton started birther movement" into Google), projecting that onto Trump regardless of what he did after the fact is blatantly dishonest.

 

[AuH20]

You know, I think Trump is probably going to be a lousy president, but I'm going to have to call B.S. on this one too. No bridges were built to anybody by Rand outside of Kentucky, when I speak to minorities in my area about Rand Paul, they don't say "Oh the guy who is in the same party as Donald Trump and all those alt. right types", they say "Oh, you mean the guy who criticized the Civil Rights Act and doesn't want me to have free money" or "Oh, you mean the guy who's dad said all that racist stuff in those newsletters".

I'm peeved beyond all recognition that Rand isn't going to be president because he was the only person who would have made any good and meaningful changes to this country's decaying government, but putting that on Trump and the alt. right is special education territory. Most of these die-hard minority Democrats are in it for the free stuff and the legal abortions, they couldn't care less about freedom as actual freedom comes with accountability which is something they don't want to deal with. Likewise, the media just says the word "racist" and the prospects of a decent guy like Paul (Rand or Ron) becoming president go to zero in seconds flat. Frankly, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for playing into that crap with Trump since you are now part of the problem.

Unless there is a dramatic cultural shift in the near future, chasing the black vote is a waste of time and resources.

 

[nikcers]

Unless there is a dramatic cultural shift in the near future, chasing the black vote is a waste of time and resources.

Unless you go there and ask for their vote, they won't vote for you. What do they have to gain by supporting Trump, it shouldn't be what do they have to lose. Do they get to support someone who came to their bad neighborhood and said im going to help fix this? I think Rand blew all of his chances by saying that he didn't want to go into the bad neighborhoods during the Baltimore riots, but Trump has had a whole year to introduce himself as not the guy who ran the birther movement, if you look at all of his campaigns research they said that before the birther crap Trump had a good name and would not be having this trouble, so he did it to himself, and he can get out of it himself, unless he wants to lose.

 

[nikcers]

You know, I think Trump is probably going to be a lousy president, but I'm going to have to call B.S. on this one too. No bridges were built to anybody by Rand outside of Kentucky, when I speak to minorities in my area about Rand Paul, they don't say "Oh the guy who is in the same party as Donald Trump and all those alt. right types", they say "Oh, you mean the guy who criticized the Civil Rights Act and doesn't want me to have free money" or "Oh, you mean the guy who's dad said all that racist stuff in those newsletters".

I'm peeved beyond all recognition that Rand isn't going to be president because he was the only person who would have made any good and meaningful changes to this country's decaying government, but putting that on Trump and the alt. right is special education territory. Most of these die-hard minority Democrats are in it for the free stuff and the legal abortions, they couldn't care less about freedom as actual freedom comes with accountability which is something they don't want to deal with. Likewise, the media just says the word "racist" and the prospects of a decent guy like Paul (Rand or Ron) becoming president go to zero in seconds flat. Frankly, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for playing into that crap with Trump since you are now part of the problem.



Hillary supporter number 3 confirmed here. Hillary started the birther thing, if you doubt this I suggest you look it up (just punch "Hillary Clinton started birther movement" into Google), projecting that onto Trump regardless of what he did after the fact is blatantly dishonest.

I support Gary Johnson, who is way better than Hillary or Trump. Trump took the birther movement to its logical conclusion which is why he is unelectable.

 

[CPUd]

You know, I think Trump is probably going to be a lousy president, but I'm going to have to call B.S. on this one too. No bridges were built to anybody by Rand outside of Kentucky, when I speak to minorities in my area about Rand Paul, they don't say "Oh the guy who is in the same party as Donald Trump and all those alt. right types", they say "Oh, you mean the guy who criticized the Civil Rights Act and doesn't want me to have free money" or "Oh, you mean the guy who's dad said all that racist stuff in those newsletters".

I'm peeved beyond all recognition that Rand isn't going to be president because he was the only person who would have made any good and meaningful changes to this country's decaying government, but putting that on Trump and the alt. right is special education territory. Most of these die-hard minority Democrats are in it for the free stuff and the legal abortions, they couldn't care less about freedom as actual freedom comes with accountability which is something they don't want to deal with. Likewise, the media just says the word "racist" and the prospects of a decent guy like Paul (Rand or Ron) becoming president go to zero in seconds flat. Frankly, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for playing into that crap with Trump since you are now part of the problem.



Hillary supporter number 3 confirmed here. Hillary started the birther thing, if you doubt this I suggest you look it up (just punch "Hillary Clinton started birther movement" into Google), projecting that onto Trump regardless of what he did after the fact is blatantly dishonest.

I put the blame on Trump and his supporters because that is exactly where it belongs. Rand was the only one in the race who wants to wind down the war on drugs, 4th Amendment abuse, and police brutality issues. He demonstrated he could work with Democrats like Cory Booker on legislation that restores voting rights to felons, and he has opened up campaign offices inside Democrat strongholds, knowing at least 90% of the voters there were voting Democrat. Rand does these things not just to try and win a vote in the next election, he wants to bring them into the party long term. It's also a part of his strategy to show the party leadership he is an asset, and thus gain their support.

The other GOP candidates will not do that type of outreach because they are interested in maintaining the status quo. Trump and his supporters are actively making things worse.

 

[hells_unicorn]

I support Gary Johnson, who is way better than Hillary or Trump. Trump took the birther movement to its logical conclusion which is why he is unelectable.

Gary Johnson is indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton, especially after making those shifts on certain issues to try and rope in the social justice fanatics. I'll be staying home this election, following the one piece of advice George Carlin gave that was actually worth following.

I put the blame on Trump and his supporters because that is exactly where it belongs. Rand was the only one in the race who wants to wind down the war on drugs, 4th Amendment abuse, and police brutality issues. He demonstrated he could work with Democrats like Cory Booker on legislation that restores voting rights to felons, and he has opened up campaign offices inside Democrat strongholds, knowing at least 90% of the voters there were voting Democrat. Rand does these things not just to try and win a vote in the next election, he wants to bring them into the party long term. It's also a part of his strategy to show the party leadership he is an asset, and thus gain their support.

The other GOP candidates will not do that type of outreach because they are interested in maintaining the status quo. Trump and his supporters are actively making things worse.

And you see how well that worked out for Rand's presidential prospects. Honestly, this stuff takes generations and it is only effective at the local and maybe the state level if we're talking about smaller states like Kentucky. The MSM and the plants that the DNC has inside these minority communities would have quashed any inroads that Rand would have made outside of Kentucky instantaneously, and in fact did if you look at how poorly Rand did in Iowa, which was an open-caucus.

Don't get me wrong, I think that things can be fixed with the minority vote, but it isn't happening in either of our lifetimes. Lyndon Johnson spoke the truth when he said he'd have blacks voting Democrat for 100 years, that's how much damage he knew he'd done with his policies, and even with a concerted effort to reverse them, that is how long it will take to do so. In the meantime, I have a certified fascist (Hillary Clinton) and two guys who are leaning heavily in that direction (Trump and Johnson). The smart money is on staying home and weathering this storm as best I can, and when the smoke clears, everybody who wasted their time voting can get a nice "I told you so".

 

[nikcers]

Gary Johnson is indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton, especially after making those shifts on certain issues to try and rope in the social justice fanatics. I'll be staying home this election, following the one piece of advice George Carlin gave that was actually worth following.



And you see how well that worked out for Rand's presidential prospects. Honestly, this stuff takes generations and it is only effective at the local and maybe the state level if we're talking about smaller states like Kentucky. The MSM and the plants that the DNC has inside these minority communities would have quashed any inroads that Rand would have made outside of Kentucky instantaneously, and in fact did if you look at how poorly Rand did in Iowa, which was an open-caucus.

Don't get me wrong, I think that things can be fixed with the minority vote, but it isn't happening in either of our lifetimes. Lyndon Johnson spoke the truth when he said he'd have blacks voting Democrat for 100 years, that's how much damage he knew he'd done with his policies, and even with a concerted effort to reverse them, that is how long it will take to do so. In the meantime, I have a certified fascist (Hillary Clinton) and two guys who are leaning heavily in that direction (Trump and Johnson). The smart money is on staying home and weathering this storm as best I can, and when the smoke clears, everybody who wasted their time voting can get a nice "I told you so".

Staying at home and not voting is the same as voting for Clinton.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

It is to Hillary's advantage to create division. Obama has done it successfully.

To be fair, Obama also gets a lot of credit for progress in race relations and his inspirational leadership. Hillary is building on that.
He had said in 2007, "we are not white america, we are not black America, we are the United States of America". Big cheers followed.

This is latest American public opinon from last week:

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...ers-clinton-maintains-lead-poll-shows-n636061

 

[enhanced_deficit]

The only problem here is that I don't think Trump even with his 100+ IQ doesn't know what the definition of a bigot is. You are not a bigot just because you see African Americans only as votes. It sorta like saying someone is a sexist just because he/she sees the opposite sex(or same sex) as just a sex object. Bigotry means hatred is in the mix and even Trump is not making that case.

Could he be assuming that people had watched the ad ( that accused Hillary of racism) he had realeased around same timeframe and left some arguments implied.

[h=1]‘The Real Predators’ — Trump’s Latest Ad HAMMERS Hillary’s Past
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ15pQULCfg

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/26/the-real-predators-trumps-latest-ad-hammers-hillarys-past-video/

 

[juleswin]

Could he be assuming that people had watched the ad ( that accused Hillary of racism) he had realeased around same timeframe and left some arguments implied.

[h=1]‘The Real Predators’ — Trump’s Latest Ad HAMMERS Hillary’s Past
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ15pQULCfg

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/26/the-real-predators-trumps-latest-ad-hammers-hillarys-past-video/

Unlikely, listen to him explain why he think Clinton is a bigot and it has nothing to do with racism. You can also hear him accuse Hillary of expressing bigotry to veteran groups. I just think he confuses neglect with bigotry.



Also listen till the end where he says hit may not be bigotry on the part of Hillary, "it could be laziness".

 

[JK/SEA]

clinton is psychotic.

this covers all her effed up psychological issues, but hillary is apparantly better suited for the job then trump according to the trump bashers in here.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Trump has employed a little known tactic in politics demonstrated here:

Actually Trump just visited Mexico.

Not sure if Hillary has ever been there.