DOJ Backs Children’s Health Defense in Antitrust Suit Against Big Media

[Swordsmyth]

DOJ Backs Children’s Health Defense in Antitrust Suit Against Big Media

The DOJ argued that the Trusted News Initiative — a partnership formed by Reuters, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, BBC and others — engaged in anticompetitive practices when its members colluded with tech platforms to censor alternative viewpoints published by smaller independent media outlets.

More at:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/doj-backs-childrens-health-defense-antitrust-suit-against-big-media/

DOJ Backs Children’s Health Defense in Antitrust Suit Against Big Media

The DOJ argued that the Trusted News Initiative — a partnership formed by Reuters, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, BBC and others — engaged in anticompetitive practices when its members colluded with tech platforms to censor alternative viewpoints published by smaller independent...

childrenshealthdefense.org

 

[acptulsa]

The DOJ argued that the Trusted News Initiative — a partnership formed by Reuters, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, BBC and others — engaged in anticompetitive practices when its members colluded with tech platforms to censor alternative viewpoints published by smaller independent media outlets.

Right. The government wants sole authority to control the narrative.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Right. The government wants sole authority to control the narrative.

LOL

Cry harder, your leftist corporate buddies are losing the power to control speech.

You can cry harder that the site won't give in to your constant demands for me to be banned for disagreeing with you too, which makes you real position on this topic clear.

 

[acptulsa]

Cry harder, your leftist corporate buddies are losing the power to control speech.

When they gained that power, you were the one crying. And when the pendulum swings back because Trump is making things worse, you'll be crying again.

I want that power decentralized and anyone who can read knows it.

 

[acptulsa]

You can cry harder that the site won't give in to your constant demands for me to be banned for disagreeing with you too, which makes you real position on this topic clear.

You are achieving new levels of hypocrisy.

https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/there-is-an-organized-effort-to-destroy-the-site.571288/

 

[Swordsmyth]

When they gained that power, you were the one crying. And when the pendulum swings back because Trump is making things worse, you'll be crying again.

I want that power decentralized and anyone who can read knows it.

Yes, I did cry at them getting that power, you reveled in it, that says everything that needs to be said.

Trump is not making anything worse and the pendulum will not swing back.

You do not want the power decentralized, you want the corporations to have it, this isn't about decentralizing it, Trump is not giving it to government.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You are achieving new levels of hypocrisy.

https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/there-is-an-organized-effort-to-destroy-the-site.571288/

Yes, and your attempts to get the mods to ban people for disagreeing with you are part of the organized effort that you admitted to.

There is no hypocrisy in pointing out your admitted goals.

Post in thread 'Probiotic twice a day zaps 'bad' cholesterol, could prevent heart disease'

May 12, 2025

Being obnoxious and derailing threads will not win you any friends or influence people.

But it has done you such wonders.

You're intent on misrepresenting what libertarianism, and what conservatism, is, driving everyone out of here, or both. And since @Bryan is determined to let you trample on Ron Paul's good name, calling him wrong, senile and brainwashed, I figure driving everyone out and shutting down your platform for sabotaging us is the best remaining option.

• acptulsa

 

[acptulsa]

There is no hypocrisy in pointing out your admitted goals.

You were doing the same thing. That's where the hypocrisy comes into it.

And nikcers isn't people. That troll account is clearly now being operated by an AI bot.

 

[Firestarter]

Cry harder, your leftist corporate buddies are losing the power to control speech.

You mean like CNN where Trump's buddy Jeff Zucker was calling the shots, while Trump's buddy Cuomo was anchor?!?

See some pictures of Jeff and Caryn Zucker, with Donald and his good friend Ghislaine Maxwell.

Post in thread 'Epstein Trump transcripts are being taken down.'

Sep 15, 2020

So you're saying Trump covered it up and the media is covering for him? Or too incompetent to find this info that you found? If trump takes a pic with a child trafficker, that makes Trump a child trafficker. Do you think because Trump takes photos with doctors, he is a doctor?

The highlighted part comes pretty close to my conclusion...


Shortly before the 10 March 2016 debates on CNN, Donald asked Michael Cohen to phone his buddy, CNN president Jeff Zucker for some tips for the ongoing debates.
Zucker refused to contact Donald by mail as requested by Cohen over the phone, even...

• Firestarter

 

[acptulsa]

Yes, I did cry at them getting that power, you reveled in it,

Show the receipts, habitual liar. It's a lie. If it were true you could produce the quotes with the greatest of ease. Do it.

and the pendulum will not swing back.

Because the pendulum isn't going anywhere now. Trump is as authoritarian as any Democrat.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You were doing the same thing. That's where the hypocrisy comes into it.

And nikcers isn't people. That troll account is clearly now being operated by an AI bot.

No, I wasn't.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Show the receipts, habitual liar. It's a lie. If it were true you could produce the quotes with the greatest of ease. Do it.

Because the pendulum isn't going anywhere now. Trump is as authoritarian as any Democrat.

The proof is in your attempts to get me banned for disagreeing with you and your attack on Trump's DoJ for trying to stop the corporate censorship.

 

[acptulsa]

The proof is in your attempts to get me banned for disagreeing with you and your attack on Trump's DoJ for trying to stop the corporate censorship.

That only proves you're stupid.

This site is private property. The First does not apply. Hypocrisy would be someone who approves of Amy and I tag teaming countless Obama trolls into forum violations so MsDoodahs could ban them, but suddenly remembers the First when it comes to neocons like you.

No, I wasn't.

See, you think when you do it for the president, it's different. Ask Nixon and his minions how that works out in the real world.

 

[Swordsmyth]

That only proves you're stupid.

This site is private property. The First does not apply. Hypocrisy would be someone who approves of Amy and I tag teaming countless Obama trolls into forum violations so MsDoodahs could ban them, but suddenly remembers the First when it comes to neocons like you.

The site is not YOUR private property, so your attempts to censor people you disagree with are not morally different from the Biden regime or the corporations in this suit.

See, you think when you do it for the president, it's different. Ask Nixon and his minions how that works out in the real world.

I didn't do it at all.
You can't point to where I did.
Pointing out your admission to trying to destroy the site (which is not your property) is not the same thing in any way.

 

[acptulsa]

The site is not YOUR private property

And my petitions have gone unanswered. So?

so your attempts to censor people you disagree with are not morally different from the Biden regime or the corporations in this suit.

Of course they are. Bryan has the right. Nothing in the Constitution forbids him, idiot.

I didn't do it at all.
You can't point to where I did.

The OP, for starters.

 

[Swordsmyth]

And my petitions have gone unanswered. So?


Of course they are. Bryan has the right. Nothing in the Constitution forbids him, idiot.



The OP, for starters.

You've lost your marbles.

 

[acptulsa]

You've lost your marbles.

You do dearly love to accuse everyone else of the things you're most guilty of.