Disinfo Campaign at Congressional District

[Danke]

Here is a flyer that wasn't screened (by the Sargent At Arms) before being distributed just before the vote this Saturday April 5th on delegates for the National Convention here in MN.

 

[TheTyke]

That's ridiculous! Is nothing beneath them...?

That being said... great job winning in spite of them!

How do people manage to distribute stuff like that? Hmm, would it be possible to distribute literature of our own?

 

[Kludge]

Wow... That was... impressive.

I didn't know trying to dis-associate with a politician was considered as "attacking" them...

 

[Cogz]

Well, for the most part the flyer is correct. But it assumes that he is wrong for believing those things. THAT is the error.

 

[MozoVote]

In a way, it's not a bad set of talking points. You get to explain all of these things and why Ron Paul took those positions.

Abondoning Reagan (over party drift) in the late 1980s is a good one.

 

[angelatc]

Are you guys new to politics? That woman is your opponent. This is really no different than passing a slim jim to a McCain supporter.

 

[MN Patriot]

Here is a flyer that wasn't screened (by the Sargent At Arms) before being distributed just before the vote this Saturday April 5th on delegates for the National Convention here in MN. The names at the bottom of the flyer have been removed.

http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/...n=view&current=RpDisinfo3.gif&t=1207622059434

You did leave the name of Lisa Murphy, who was behind this flyer, and her email addresses.
She should be politely admonished for being part of the destruction of the Republican Party.
I went to her campaign website. I was #238 visitor.

Drop her a line:

[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.citizens4murphy.com

 

[Change]

In a way, it's not a bad set of talking points. You get to explain all of these things and why Ron Paul took those positions.

Abondoning Reagan (over party drift) in the late 1980s is a good one.

Rule 101, Never let anyone else define your positions.

 

[Change]

Are you guys new to politics? That woman is your opponent. This is really no different than passing a slim jim to a McCain supporter.

Without a true evidence based link, I agreed that this women, if true, seems to clearly have taken a position against Ron Paul, which is stupid to say the least. Looking over her format against her "real" opponent the democrat I see some positive stuff that she is campaigning against that the democrat is in support of. Smoke out the flyer let's hope it is not linked back to the GOP itself, that would be a real sad state of affairs; I get the impression at times that the GOP is two faced and doesn't stand tall for Ron Paul as they do the other candidates running for the President of the United States. They really should be notified about this flyer. It would be the ethical thing for the GOP to say something. This should be demanded of the GOP considering Ron Paul's name is on the GOP Ballot and a financial investment was made in order to do so. I see a GOP responsibility here.

So, lets take a deeper look at Lisa, she seems pretty confident to go about her campaign is such a deceitful way if true. Let's clear up some information on exactly where she stands on policy.

The important thing is not to get diverted. A statement on the flyer should be addressed by the campaign with a Press Release on the wire that it was really unethical to do prior to a vote. I believe there is rules about campaigning a certain distance from a election/vote. A clear statement of disappointment of ethics without blaming any one individual - I don't see a down side.

 

[JeffSchulman]

M***et

She Has A Mullet! Nuff Said!

 

[Danke]

You did leave the name of Lisa Murphy, who was behind this flyer, and her email addresses.
She should be politely admonished for being part of the destruction of the Republican Party.
I went to her campaign website. I was #238 visitor.

Drop her a line:

[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.citizens4murphy.com

You were visitor #238, it is now up to 37272!

I might have to ask her if that counter is working properly:

http://www.citizens4murphy.com/Contact_Us.html

 

[Change]

see, you really can't attack Ron Paul! We have his back!