Did anyone just see Glen Beck's insulting attack about Ron Paul?

[4Horsemen]

He stated what was documented in the 911 Commission and CIA reports. He never said anything about rationalities or justifications for the 911 attack. He stated it was one the "reasons" the terrorist attacked us. This isn't a unigue situation, the American Indians took great offense to others inhabiting their land, especially when they warned them but were ignored. That provided a motive to kill the settlers, and did the Indians feel justified with their actions? I'm sure they did, and the rational is in the eye of the beholder.

 

[thePhilosopher]

He stated what was documented in the 911 Commission and CIA reports. He never said anything about rationalities or justifications for the 911 attack. He stated it was one the "reasons" the terrorist attacked us. This isn't a unigue situation, the American Indians took great offense to others inhabiting their land, especially when they warned them but were ignored. That provided a motive to kill the settlers, and did the Indians feel justified with their actions? I'm sure they did, and the rational is in the eye of the beholder.

When you start to say that terrorism is rational, by talking about the reasoning behind it, that is when you have difficulty saying that it is wrong. This is not what Paul has done, but this is what he is in danger of doing. You cannot justify killing innocent people intentionally with terrorist tactics. You can't begin to speak of the "reasons" of terrorism because it is irrational. I can't believe I've had to go over this over and over again on a conservative candidate's board. Anyone who is a conservative would understand this to be an elementary truth.