Corn Pop Mandates More . . . Corn

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,537
Corn Pop Mandates More . . . Corn

https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2022/04/13/corn-pop-mandates-more-corn/

By
eric -
April 13, 2022

Here’s a great way to reduce the artificially induced doubling of the price of a gallon of gas: Reduce how far a gallon of gas will propel your car.

That’s what Corn Pop just did by issuing a diktat – these are styled “executive orders” to make them seem less diktaty – that “gas” will henceforth be 85 percent gas rather than 90 percent. Another 5 percent of the stuff you pump will be ethanol – alcohol derived from corn.

Supposedly, this will reduce the cost of a gallon since ethanol is “renewable” and made right here, in the USSA. Actually, it will reduce the fuel efficiency of every car that burns it because alcohol contains substantially less energy (BTUs) than gasoline. So you’ll pay a bit less – maybe – but you’ll go less far.

And so, pay more often.

Isn’t it grand?

Corn Pop pays off the corn lobby – the agribusiness cartels that control the corn in this country – and Americans get to pay more, again.

They will also pay more in other ways.

For food, for instance. Corn diverted to make fuel means less corn for feed – for cattle. And chickens and pigs and every other iteration of livestock that eats corn. You’ll pay more to get to and from the store and while at the store, you’ll pay more for what’s in the store.

That’s what Corn Pop has in store for you.

If you own an older car, there is something worse in store for you. Unless your car was designed to handle “gas” that is 15 percent alcohol, it will not do well on Corn Pop. Alcohol is caustic to rubber and plastic parts not made to handle it – and many cars made before the early 2000s were not made to handle it. Some specifically warn about using E15 or higher, with injunctions that doing so may void warranty coverage – which of course is no longer applicable for most of these cars. That means the owner will be left holding the bag for any damages to his vehicle caused by Corn Pop.

Same goes for outdoor and recreational power equipment, which in many cases also came with (and still comes with) warning labels to not use E15 or higher.

Which brings us to what this Great Cornholio’ing may in fact be all about. Could it be possible that Corn Pop – or those who change his diapers – are using the public upset over their doubling of gas prices as the “crisis” to diktat a measure which will accelerate the retirement of the older cars that present an impediment to the cattle-prodding of the populace into electric cars?

There has been a great deal of talk among the hoi polloi about evading “electrification” – and the tandem Big-Brothering of new cars, generally – by hanging on to older cars made before cars got Big Brothery. Cars that did not come with “advanced driver assistance technology – i.e., driver pre-emption “technology” – and which were not “connected” to anything except whoever had their hand on the wheel.

Cars that were – that are – readily repairable by almost anyone who can read a manual and has the gumption to turn a wrench – very much the opposite of recent-vintage cars, which are so forbiddingly electronicized one needs a degree in electrical engineering as well as thousands of dollars’ worth of proprietary diagnostic technology only a dealer can afford (and has access to) in order to perform even basic service.

In other words cars that serve to liberate rather than enserf their owners – who actually do own them, as the cars are generally paid-for. What is wanted, of course, is more paying. Serially. Forever. Ge thee on the monthly revolving debt-service plan. Never own anything – and be happy.

As for outdoor power equipment, the implications there are interesting as well. It is known – because they have let it be known – that hoi polloi ought not live in the country; ought not to have land, especially. It is harder to own land when you cannot mow the grass – because your mower (or tractor) has been ruined by “gas” adulterated with alcohol. There may of course be E15-compatible replacement equipment available – for now. But it will cost you more than perhaps you can afford. So as to make it harder and harder – eventually/ideally – impossible for you to live where they don’t want you to.

By the way – and also of interest – ethanol burned en masse in cars is known (or at least, it is said) to be a health hazard, according to both the EPA and CDC. It causes or contributes to coughing and inflamed/damaged airways in people’s lungs, worsens existing respiratory conditions such as asthma and bronchitis as well as increases general susceptibility to infections.

What happened to all that overweaning “concern” about “public health”? Only when it suits.

And now, it doesn’t.
 
Last edited:
image.png
 
Which brings us to what this Great Cornholio’ing may in fact be all about. Could it be possible that Corn Pop – or those who change his diapers – are using the public upset over their doubling of gas prices as the “crisis” to diktat a measure which will accelerate the retirement of the older cars that present an impediment to the cattle-prodding of the populace into electric cars?

Perhaps. But you also have to realize that they want you to have no vehicle at all, ICE or electric. They will ruin your old gas car, and new electric cars will be priced out of reach.
 
Perhaps. But you also have to realize that they want you to have no vehicle at all, ICE or electric. They will ruin your old gas car, and new electric cars will be priced out of reach.

EV's will be incentivized as a tax credit as this is what the government wants rather than what the market dictates.
 
I've been running the ethanol free in the 67 but it's expensive in Florida. 5 bucks a gallon. So I'm setting it up to run on regular. It's going to cost me a little over a hundred bucks. $90 for a new chinese knock off rochester carb that can handle ethanol and a few feet of nitrile fuel hose. Really not the end of the world. Next week I will be able to fuel it anywhere for $3.80.
 
I've been running the ethanol free in the 67 but it's expensive in Florida. 5 bucks a gallon. So I'm setting it up to run on regular. It's going to cost me a little over a hundred bucks. $90 for a new chinese knock off rochester carb that can handle ethanol and a few feet of nitrile fuel hose. Really not the end of the world. Next week I will be able to fuel it anywhere for $3.80.

Make sure they get the hose from the tank, and the fuel gauge sending unit gasket. Take it in with only fumes in the tank, and seriously consider having the rust cleaned out and the tank sealed. And make them give you the old carb. It can be rebuilt with neoprene seals, and if the Chinese crap gives you problems, you can find someone to do that and put it back on. Asking for the old parts back is a long-standing tradition any competent mechanic will honor.
 
Last edited:
“Gas” is about to become another 5 percent less so.

President Trump just issued a fuhrerbefehl – a Fuhrer Order, as it was styled back in you-know-where, by you-know-who – directing the EPA to change its befehls (orders) to infuse the nation’s “gas” supply with 15 percent ethanol (E15), year ’round.

Up to now, the limit of ethanol-adulteration – in most places, most of the time – has been 10 percent (E10).

But what’s the problem with ethanol?

Well, it there isn’t one – if you’re the one selling it. But if you have to use it, there’s a price to be paid above and beyond what you pay for each gallon.

Ethanol-adulterated fuel is several percent less energy dense than 100 percent gas.

Which is why cars burn more of it to go a given distance than they would a gallon of not-adulterated, 100 percent gas.

15 percent ethanol (E15) will decrease the distance your car can go on a gallon by another noticeable percentage.

But, wait a minute . . . isn’t the government “concerned” about fuel economy? Well, Trump is also concerned about re-election. And ethanol is of great concern to the agriculture cartels which are politically puissant in Iowa and other “corn” states where the crops which are transmuted into ethanol are grown.

Hence the new ethanol-friendly befehl.


https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2018/10/14/less-gas-in-your-gas/
 
Last edited:

Not according to Politico.

Trump set to duck no-win ethanol decision until after election

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/17/trump-ducks-ethanol-decision-election-397347

By ERIC WOLFF

08/17/2020 06:31 PM EDT

The Trump administration appears set to postpone politically fraught decisions on ethanol until after the November election to avoid a backlash from the feuding agriculture and petroleum sectors, according to several people in both industries who have been in contact with the White House and the Environmental Protection Agency.
 
Not according to Politico.

Trump set to duck no-win ethanol decision until after election

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/17/trump-ducks-ethanol-decision-election-397347

By ERIC WOLFF

08/17/2020 06:31 PM EDT

The Trump administration appears set to postpone politically fraught decisions on ethanol until after the November election to avoid a backlash from the feuding agriculture and petroleum sectors, according to several people in both industries who have been in contact with the White House and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Totally different pandering. That pandering was Trump allowing pumps marked 'E10' to actually dispense 'E15'

GetStoredImage




The pandering that I linked was from the previous year:

EPA Delivers On President Trump’s Promise To Allow Year-Round Sale Of E15 Gasoline And Improve Transparency In Renewable Fuel Markets

WASHINGTON (May 31, 2019) – Today, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler signed the final action that would remove the key regulatory barrier to using gasoline blended with up to 15% ethanol (E15) during the summer driving season and reform the renewable identification number (RIN) compliance system under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program to increase transparency and deter price manipulation. Taken together, these steps follow through on the Trump Administration’s commitment to responsible environmental protection that promotes energy independence, regulatory reform, and increasing the use of biofuels to give consumers more choices, while supporting American farmers.

“Following President Trump’s directive, today’s action expands the market for biofuels and improves the RFS program by increasing transparency and reducing price manipulation,” said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler. “As President Trump promised, EPA is approving the year-round sale of E15 in time for summer driving season, giving drivers more choices at the pump.



https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/ep...llow-year-round-sale-e15-gasoline-and-improve

trump-e15.jpeg




Maybe you'd rather hear it from him:

 
Maybe you'd rather hear it from him:



Yup, there it is, loud and clear.

Imagine my shock, they are both on the same side regarding ethanol mandates.

Are you trying to build a case to paint me as a die hard Trump supporter that does not recognize his numerous flip flops and hypocrisies?
 
Totally different pandering. That pandering was Trump allowing pumps marked 'E10' to actually dispense 'E15'

GetStoredImage

Not according to the article:

EPA faces a late-November deadline to decide how many billion gallons of ethanol the oil refining industry must blend into the nation’s gasoline and diesel supply, but the agency has yet to even issue its proposal, which is itself months overdue. That decision has been delayed because of a battle over small oil refiners’ request for exemptions that corn farmers say would undercut the 2007 law that is designed to promote biofuels.
 
Back
Top