Computer Programmer Testifies He Coded Computers To Rig Elections

[openfire]

When campaign minions aren’t fudging the physical vote count, computers, tasked with tallying the vote, are susceptible to hacking. In 2006, the documentary Hacking Democracy, exposed Diebold and their role in rigging elections with their electronic voting machines. Clinton Eugene “Clint” Curtis is an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-employee of NASA and ExxonMobil, who also exposed election hacking. He is notable chiefly for making a series of whistleblower allegations about his former employer and about Republican Congressman Tom Feeney, including an allegation that in 2000, Feeney and Yang Enterprises requested Curtis’s assistance in a scheme to steal votes by inserting fraudulent code into touch screen voting systems. Curtis is seen in the video below testifying under oath in front of the U.S. House Judiciary Members in Ohio. He tells the members how he was hired by Congressman Tom Feeney in 2000 to build a prototype software package that would secretly rig an election to sway the result 51 / 49 to a specified side.

 

[CPUd]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...mer-under-oath-admits-computers-rig-elections

 

[openfire]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...mer-under-oath-admits-computers-rig-elections

^ Old thread.

New relevant info: The majority of companies in control of the electronic voting machines are Clinton donors.

@9:58

 

[puppetmaster]

^ Old thread.

New relevant info: The majority of companies in control of the electronic voting machines are Clinton donors.

@9:58

kind of scary

 

[P3ter_Griffin]

I'll try to dig out the info so I can link to it... one of the democracy alliance (leftist organization) documents I looked at was talking about how they were successful in replacing hackable voting machines... Ohio was one of the states... and in some other states as well. So if we are to believe that it would be the right which is hacking the machines (as is the case in the OP video).

And this makes sense. The left is all about movement building to gain voters.. providing same day registration.. working to get felons access to voting... working to get minority communities voting.. mail voting, weekend voting, no voter ID... this list goes on and on. They want everyone to get out to vote because the more voters the more likely the left is going to win. Whereas the right bases its movement.. or at least it appears to me.. on buying candidates and airtime, without the community contact.

Its definitely no slam dunk... something to think about though. I'll try and dig that shit up.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

[h=2]Computer Programmer Testifies He Coded Computers To Rig Elections[/h]

Trump to Russia: If you find any missing votes, please let us know.