CNBC media blackout

Thrashertm

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Messages
1,608
This morning, CNBS' Morning Call had a segment on the CT senate race, getting a report from MSM shill John Harwood (Hardon). Of course they mentioned McMahon and late-comer Simmons, but no mention of Schiff, who they used to interview regularly. Man that really grinds my gears!
 
This morning, CNBS' Morning Call had a segment on the CT senate race, getting a report from MSM shill John Harwood (Hardon). Of course they mentioned McMahon and late-comer Simmons, but no mention of Schiff, who they used to interview regularly. Man that really grinds my gears!

As far as I'm concerned the crap these people are pulling is treason.
 
Treason, traitorous, cowardice, you name it. CNBC's got it. They've been embarrassed by Schiff over all these years that you really can't blame them for developing into total pansies.

That's why I'm done with CNBC, done with Fox, and only watching Freedom Watch on FBN.
 
Treason, traitorous, cowardice, you name it. CNBC's got it. They've been embarrassed by Schiff over all these years that you really can't blame them for developing into total pansies.

That's why I'm done with CNBC, done with Fox, and only watching Freedom Watch on FBN.


Don't forget John Stossel ;)
 
I think it's simply the case that, from the perspective of the media who don't bother focusing much on party primaries, Peter doesn't have a chance. I don't think it's some sort of "conspiracy". Afterall, look at all the coverage Rand got during his primary.
 
same thing on fox and friends this morning. They mentioned all the races today. When they got to CT. they mentioned all three but only had a simmons and mcmahon picture. Then the very next race had all three candidates pictures. I turned it off soon after.
 
I think it's simply the case that, from the perspective of the media who don't bother focusing much on party primaries, Peter doesn't have a chance. I don't think it's some sort of "conspiracy". Afterall, look at all the coverage Rand got during his primary.

It's not a conspiracy, but it's just irritating when media that Schiff has met personally goes out of their way to ignore him.
 
Rand got coverage because they could not ignore him. His name recognition was already too high to ignore, thanks to Ron Paul. The first poll had him at 26%. Otherwise, Rand would have been ignored as well.
 
Seems familiar somehow...

Yeah, where have I seen this before?

same thing on fox and friends this morning. They mentioned all the races today. When they got to CT. they mentioned all three but only had a simmons and mcmahon picture. Then the very next race had all three candidates pictures. I turned it off soon after.

Tell me about it...

^ these

welcome to 2008....

For the folks who weren't around for RP08 this is a VERY familiar pattern. It was REALLY bad in 2008, when the media was ALL OVER ghouliani who was polling lower and had fewer votes and delegates than Paul, but without fail, failed to mention Paul at all...

In fact, there were cases when they would have a pie chart of votes, Paul would come in second, and that second place was the only slice unlabeled....
 
^ these

welcome to 2008....

For the folks who weren't around for RP08 this is a VERY familiar pattern. It was REALLY bad in 2008, when the media was ALL OVER ghouliani who was polling lower and had fewer votes and delegates than Paul, but without fail, failed to mention Paul at all...

In fact, there were cases when they would have a pie chart of votes, Paul would come in second, and that second place was the only slice unlabeled....

EXACTLY... this 22% is GREAT news for us... We are getting somewhere! Gotta keep drudging forward... a revolution in thinking like the one we are pushing is going to take more than just a couple election cycles... (although I know we are all anxious for it to happen quicker. lol)
 
Richardson on the chart with 2%
demresults010308.jpg


Ron paul not on the chart with 10%
repubresults010308.jpg
 
It's not a conspiracy, but it's just irritating when media that Schiff has met personally goes out of their way to ignore him.

Define conspiracy?

The media damn well knows who they push and who they try to bury. It's intentional. They pretty much make the choices, and the ignorant sheeple do as they are told by the "impartial" media. :rolleyes: The media is an arm of the Oligarchy.

YouTube - ‪Council on Foreign Relations‬‎
 
Back
Top