Lucille
Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2007
- Messages
- 15,019
Bundy, Assange, Manning, and prog "principles." - "Do you see what statism does to you?"
Yeah, Let's Make It All About Racism
http://dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014/5/9/yeah-lets-make-it-all-about-racism.html
Yeah, Let's Make It All About Racism
http://dollarvigilante.com/blog/2014/5/9/yeah-lets-make-it-all-about-racism.html
CLIVEN BUNDY
Having the ability to reduce a massive in-your-face land grab to be nothing more than about racism is no ordinary task, it certainly takes a very special type of person to accomplish the mission, a person with no shame, no scruples nor common sense for that matter. In fact you have to be clinically insane or otherwise it wouldn’t even occur to you.
Making a major land grab seem all about racism is like witnessing a rape taking place while you’re complaining about the victim’s clothing “Wait, is that fur she’s wearing? Oh my god, how dare she!” You perceive all of the victim's cries for help as mere noise because you're just too busy judging her wardrobe. You see, we’ve always known that we’re living in the twilight zone and that the age of reason is long gone. We’ve always known that, but now we have proof.
What’s even more insane about this is observing all the Obama supporters, the "leftists", calling for drone strikes on Cliven Bundy’s family and their sympathizers. Let’s not forget that these are the same people that were screaming bloody murder when Bush was bombing innocent people into pieces. They opposed violence time-and-time again, but not because they recognized the evil immorality of massacring innocent people. Instead they wished to hold the moral high ground on those futile republicans they saw merely as retarded rednecks. The irony however is that those same “sophisticated" anti-war leftists are now asking for the massacre and decimation of the innocent, only they keep pretending to have the moral high ground by doing so. as you can observe in these tweets. Luckily these tweets took place before that racism psy-op happened, otherwise they would’ve been asking for the atomic bomb.
[...]
The same thing happened with Julian Assange. They made it all about that Swedish woman and the mystery of the self-slitting condom, again just to create enough confusion so everybody forgot about the humongous elephant in the room, the unbelievable atrocities that Wikileaks exposed, the evil reality of the soul-crushing sociopathic system we live-and-die under.
[...]
DO YOU SEE WHAT STATISM DOES TO YOU?
"He’s racist! Send a Drone strike on his ass!"
"But… didn’t the tape appear to be edited, as it is common procedure in mainstream media?"
"I don’t care he looks like a racist, plus he’s a republican, bomb them!"
"How about the innocent families and children over there?"
"Well, casualities of war."
"Wait, what? Isn’t that what the republicans used to say?"
Funny people those Dems (which I believe the word Dems doesn't do them justice and that an “on“ should be thrown in the middle between the M and the S). They were all against war and violence… But as soon as their beloved Obama got elected, they had no trouble advocating violence against other people. As much as I hate to say it, that is change.
[...]
![]()
Can you recall the name of the whistleblower that leaked those pictures? Exactly. That was then, and this is now, because now with this benevolent demonic - sorry, democratic administration - it’s not the perpetrator of the crimes that goes to jail, it’s the person who exposes them! Now, that’s change.
So if your name is Chelsea Manning and you can’t live with yourself watching how your "comrades" enjoy making the murder of infants a vicious game, if you can’t live with yourself watching how psychopaths relish the slaughtering of the most defenseless of our species, then you're a bad statist, and if you do something about it, then you have to go to jail. You have to pay for having a conscience.
So if you’re a leftist, how can you defend that? And why would you try for that matter? Just to win the argument? Do you even see what you participate in? What excuses could you possibly have? That he’s a traitor and those babies were casualties of war? How does that work? Children killed before 2008 are innocent civilians, and ALL the children killed after 2008 come from he same family - "the enemy combatant family"? All this hypocrisy just to defend the fact that you've voted for Obama? Do you see what statism does to you?
"You read this stuff in 1984 and it is a portrait of insanity, we are now at war with east Asia, we have always been at war with east Asia, whereas yesterday it was Eurasia, this constant erasure of the past, this constant living in the propaganda of the now, it squeezes and shreds any capacity for moral outrage in the hearts of mankind, to such a degree that I almost don’t know, I almost don’t know to which degree to which I would seriously get behind and push for the continued success of the species as it stands. It is repulsive. It is repulsive the degree to which we have forgotten all the moral absolutes of yesterday for the sake of the complete moral absolutes of today and we don't even know that we've forgotten them. Look, it's one thing to say that I've betrayed my principles, it's another thing to say that I have no principles, it's another thing to say that I'll have these principles today which are the opposite yesterday's principles because these principles are more useful for me today, these are all crazy but functionally crazy, what is not functionally crazy, what is psychotic beyond reason and evidence and empiricism and survival is to say: These have always been my absolute principles even though they are the absolute principles that I had yesterday". - Stefan Molyneux