Constitutional Paulicy
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 2,454
Bridgegate, the Sequel
The Christie administration is facing inquiry over a bridge. Again.
By Lucia Graves
June 24, 2014
Investigations into Chris Christie's "Bridgegate" scandal, the politically motivated lane closings at the George Washington Bridge last year, have yielded some decidedly bad news for the New Jersey governor: Another Christie bridge scandal at a completely different bridge.
In this new chapter of the Christie saga, investigators are pointing to securities-law violations in a $1.8 billion road-repair agreement from 2011, according to reporting in The New York Times. This time the inquiries are centered around the Pulaski Skyway, the dilapidated roadway connecting Newark to Jersey City. The Christie administration sought to repair the crumbling thoroughfare by diverting Port Authority funds from a new Hudson River rail tunnel canceled by Christie in the fall of 2010.
Port Authority lawyers warned the Christie administration that the Pulaski Skyway, which is owned and operated by the state, falls outside of the agency's purview. Christie's team justified the spending by calling the road an access way to the Lincoln Tunnel (something that does fall under agency purview), although the two aren't connected. Soon after, Port Authority lawyers changed their tune, altering a memo to say the agency did in fact have authority over the project. "We are now saying we have legislative authority," the revised document read, according to The Times.
more here... http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/bridgegate-the-sequel-20140624
2nd Bridge Inquiry Said to Be Linked to Christie
By MATT FLEGENHEIMER, WILLIAM K. RASHBAUM and KATE ZERNIKE
JUNE 23, 2014
The accuracy of this characterization is now a major focus of the investigations, according to several people briefed on the matter. Under a New York State law known as the Martin Act, prosecutors can bring felony charges for intentionally deceiving bond holders, without having to prove any intent to defraud or even establish that any fraud occurred.
Two veteran prosecutors in the Manhattan district attorney’s office public corruption unit are working with two S.E.C. lawyers who are experts in such bond issues, one person briefed on the matter said, and another noted that while the agencies were each conducting separate parallel inquiries, they were working together.
In addition to criminal charges under the Martin Act, the investigations could result in civil action under the Martin Act or by the S.E.C., under federal securities laws.
more here... http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/24/nyregion/2nd-bridge-inquiry-said-to-be-linked-to-christie.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpSum&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1&assetType=nyt_now