Bob Barr ‘Bush showed incredible leadership’ criticizes Ron Paul

Hamer

Banned
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
971
Bob Barr ‘Bush showed incredible leadership’ criticizes Ron Paul

Ok enough is enough and BARR IS DONE!

Chuck Baldwin has my donations and my votes 100%

WWW.BUCKFORCHUCK.COM September 20th 2008

Barr campaign manager: ‘Bush showed incredible leadership’, criticizes Ron Paul and followers: Are you kidding me? Praises George W. Bush? Time for this clown to resign and step down.

http://www.independentpoliticalrepo...leadership-criticizes-ron-paul-and-followers/

Russ Verney, the campaign manager of the Libertarian Party’s presidential nominee says that President George W. Bush showed “incredible leadership as he stood atop a fire truck amidst the rubble of the twin towers to rally America.”

Verney then compares Bush’s “incredible leadership” to the “leadership” exhibited by Libertarian VP nominee Wayne Allyn Root in offering to illegally step down as Bob Barr’s running mate in deference to Ron Paul.

Yesterday, our vice presidential candidate, Wayne Allyn Root, offered to step aside to allow Congressman Ron Paul an opportunity to serve on the presidential ticket of the Libertarian Party and move the agenda of Liberty forward.

On the surface, a simple offer was extended. In fact it was principled leadership at its finest.

Then Verney goes on to criticize Ron Paul, saying the Campagin for Liberty’s historic announcement yesterday was not about “promoting the liberty agenda; it was about promoting a man.

It became evident to me after meeting with Ron Paul’s staff that this media event was not about promoting the liberty agenda; it was about promoting a man. That’s not what we’re in this for.

After rumors were spread in advance of the news conference that Bob Barr was dropping from the race - just to hype the event - I became even more hesitant to attend. Those tactics were unacceptable and when asked about it, Ron Paul’s staff simply smiled and said it would attract the press.

When I was provided a copy of Ron Paul’s prepared remarks just hours before the start of the planned news conference it became clear to me that the message Ron Paul intended to deliver was essentially to scatter the votes for the liberty agenda to the four winds.

His remarks not only encouraged anyone listening to support any one of four candidates, he also applauded ‘non-voters’. To me encouraging people not to vote is not principled leadership for the Liberty agenda.

I made the decision that attending that news conference was not consistent with Bob Barr’s principled leadership for the Liberty agenda.

Once I informed Ron Paul’s staff of my decision I was rudely informed that my decision would have permanent ramifications, I was personally threatened and Bob Barr was politically threatened. That’s a far cry from principled leadership.

Now, the battle lines have been drawn, says Verney, and those who stand with Paul are “cultists.”

One thing that did occur as a result of yesterday’s events is a clear separation of certain factions. Up until now, we have been dealing with two groups, those who want to advance the issues of liberty and those who have been drawn into a cult of personality.

Add this to the Snubgate archive.

The full text of the message is included below:

Dear Friend,

Before I move forward with an important report for today, I would like to recognize and remember the 2,819 men and women who lost their lives seven years ago. As a result of the attacks of September 11th, Americans came together, setting aside differences in order mourn our shared losses and assist our neighbors in need.

May we never forget . . .

In times of crisis, strength in leadership requires boldness of character, clear direction and firm resolve. As we witnessed after the attacks of September 11th, President George W. Bush showed incredible leadership as he stood atop a fire truck amidst the rubble of the twin towers to rally America.

While the quality of leadership is rare enough, principled leaders are few and far between. Those who do appear to posses the traits necessary to lead, for reasons only known to themselves, frequently choose not to stand on principle.

Yesterday, our vice presidential candidate, Wayne Allyn Root, offered to step aside to allow Congressman Ron Paul an opportunity to serve on the presidential ticket of the Libertarian Party and move the agenda of Liberty forward.

On the surface, a simple offer was extended. In fact it was principled leadership at its finest.

Wayne Allyn Root showed his deep commitment to the principles of our cause. Without hesitation or regard to the effort, time and personal funds he has committed to the issues of freedom, smaller government, less taxes and the Libertarian ticket, Wayne offered to step aside to allow another leader to step up.

I could not be more proud of his actions and selflessness.

As America is hurling towards crisis on many fronts, we need principled leaders like Bob Barr and Wayne Allyn Root. We have no time to waste on anything other than spreading the message of smaller government, less taxes, and more personal freedom issues across this nation.

That brings me to my next point.

Today our campaign is being criticized by a few people for my decision to not attend a press conference sponsored by Ron Paul’s political action committee. I thought I would take a minute to explain to you why I made that decision.

It became evident to me after meeting with Ron Paul’s staff that this media event was not about promoting the liberty agenda; it was about promoting a man. That’s not what we’re in this for.

After rumors were spread in advance of the news conference that Bob Barr was dropping from the race - just to hype the event - I became even more hesitant to attend. Those tactics were unacceptable and when asked about it, Ron Paul’s staff simply smiled and said it would attract the press.

When I was provided a copy of Ron Paul’s prepared remarks just hours before the start of the planned news conference it became clear to me that the message Ron Paul intended to deliver was essentially to scatter the votes for the liberty agenda to the four winds.

His remarks not only encouraged anyone listening to support any one of four candidates, he also applauded ‘non-voters’. To me encouraging people not to vote is not principled leadership for the Liberty agenda.

I made the decision that attending that news conference was not consistent with Bob Barr’s principled leadership for the Liberty agenda.

Once I informed Ron Paul’s staff of my decision I was rudely informed that my decision would have permanent ramifications, I was personally threatened and Bob Barr was politically threatened. That’s a far cry from principled leadership.

One thing that did occur as a result of yesterday’s events is a clear separation of certain factions. Up until now, we have been dealing with two groups, those who want to advance the issues of liberty and those who have been drawn into a cult of personality.

There are those who support a specific politician and then there are those who support the liberty agenda regardless of standard-bearer.

Bob Barr, Wayne Allyn Root and the Libertarian Party stand for the issues of personal freedom and responsible government. As they have proven, both Bob and Wayne are willing to lead or follow for the advancement of our issues.

Now is their time to lead.

As we move into the final 50 days of the campaign we are in place to make a strong impact on the future of our country.

At the end of the day, the number of votes cast in support of the Liberty agenda in the General Election will influence the national political agenda of the next four years.

If we do our jobs, work hard and give us much as possible until Election Day, our voices will be heard and our agenda of smaller government, lower taxes, more personal freedom and government accountability will be on the table for years to come.

I appreciate your commitment and dedication.

Sincerely,

Russ signature

Russell Verney
Campaign Manager


www.buckforchuck.com
 
Oh cmon??? a buck for chuck? That is completely stolen from huckabee. Anyone remember a buck for huck?
 
Sounds like he's completely in line with the Libertarian/GOP neo-con platform.

Bob Barr was the perfect candidate for them.
 
I totally oppose Bob Barr and will not vote for him.

However, I also oppose Baldwin because he is a theocrat.

I will be writing in Ron Paul's name.
 
I love how people assume Baldwin is a theocrat simply because he is a Pastor. Read his writings, I trust him much more than any other candidate right now.
 
Bush did show incredible leadership after 9/11. His approval ratings were in the 80s, no? Sadly, the neocons sunk their fangs into him and he squandered all the good will he had waging war in Iraq and letting bin Laden get away.

As far as Barr's statement goes, I wouldn't exactly call this a ringing endorsement:

The Bush administration deserves credit for having done much to disable al Qaeda as an effective terrorist organization,” Barr says. “However, early on, the administration took its eye off of the ball when it shifted troops from searching for Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan to use in the unnecessary war in Iraq. Now, the situation in Afghanistan is deteriorating badly,” adds Barr.

“Moreover, the Bush administration engaged in a sustained attack on the liberty and privacy of Americans in the name of combating terrorism. It drafted the Patriot Act, which provided the federal government with powers well beyond those necessary to confront potential terrorists, and it initiated an illegal surveillance program of telephone calls and emails, ignoring both the Constitution and the law,” Barr explains.

“Obviously, the federal government has a responsibility to protect Americans from terrorist threats,” Barr notes. “However, equally fundamental is the government’s responsibility to respect the liberties which the federal government is tasked to protect. If we sacrifice those basic freedoms, then truly the terrorists have won,” Barr says.
 
I love how people assume Baldwin is a theocrat simply because he is a Pastor. Read his writings, I trust him much more than any other candidate right now.

Baldwin's homophobic, anti-immigration, anti-gambling/porn, protectionist, drug-warring ways are why I can't stand him. Also, the CP's "robust Christian nation" platform completely turns me off.
 
Last edited:
I love how people assume Baldwin is a theocrat simply because he is a Pastor. Read his writings, I trust him much more than any other candidate right now.

agreed, his party may be theocratic but thats the same thing as saying Ron Paul is a neocon cause hes a republican.


Chuck B FTW
 
Most people who bash Baldwin don't even know anything about him

As with the "war on drugs," President Bush's "war on terror" is the cornerstone doctrine which allows the executive branch of the federal government to run roughshod over the Constitution and individual liberty.

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin305.htm

They have had it with the "war on drugs" and the "war on terror" being used as excuses to trample people's freedoms.

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin420.htm
 
agreed, his party may be theocratic but thats the same thing as saying Ron Paul is a neocon cause hes a republican.

Excellent point. I'd vote for Ron Paul if he was running for the Greens. I'd think the Green Party had lost its collective mind, but I'd sure vote for Ron Paul.

That said, I just can't help but shake my head at a party hitching its wagon to someone with about 20% approval ratings and then patting itself on the back for 'incredible leadership'. It's incredible, all right...
 
Bush did show incredible leadership after 9/11.

How about DURING 9/11 when he was sitting reading "My Pet Goat" to some elementary school kids when he should have been protecting our country by ordering the rest of the hijacked planes to be shot down instead of potentially killing hundreds or thousands more?!?! Ya. Great "Leadership" there!!


His approval ratings were in the 80s, no?

Yes, PTSD is a terrible condition that can cause massive hallucination of thoughts, veering far from anything remotely intelligible.


Sadly, the neocons sunk their fangs into him and he squandered all the good will he had waging war in Iraq and letting bin Laden get away.


Bush IS a neocon, though he may be kept out of the loop on a lot of things..


Remember Ron Paul's speech on 9/12/01 where he called for a Marque of Reprisal against the terrorists, rather than an invasion of a country. I think he was hesitant to invade Afghanistan, and as I recall I was completely against invading a country to find Osama.. Though I'm not against finding the CIA asset Osama in general..
 
How about DURING 9/11 when he was sitting reading "My Pet Goat" to some elementary school kids when he should have been protecting our country by ordering the rest of the hijacked planes to be shot down instead of potentially killing hundreds or thousands more?!?! Ya. Great "Leadership" there!!

I found it especially appalling that during one of his post 9/11 speeches, Bush called his new war on terror a "Crusade". Good idea, let's tell the Muslim extremists that we're supposed to be fighting because they're terrorists, not Muslims, that we're coming to fight another Crusade. That'll really pissem off!

The original root meaning of the word Crusade is "War of the Cross".
 
I found it especially appalling that during one of his post 9/11 speeches, Bush called his new war on terror a "Crusade". Good idea, let's tell the Muslim extremists that we're supposed to be fighting because they're terrorists, not Muslims, that we're coming to fight another Crusade. That'll really pissem off!

The original root meaning of the word Crusade is "War of the Cross".

Exactly, these people are equating hate speech with "great leadership" :mad::mad:
 
Back
Top