Billions in U.S. aid may not keep lights on in Afghanistan, says gov. auditor

Origanalist

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
43,054
American taxpayers have spent tens of billions of dollars to help build Afghanistan's infrastructure, but when the U.S. pulls out, the embattled nation will be lucky to keep the lights on, said the official in charge of inspecting the financial books.

John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan Reconstruction, at a speech Wednesday at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C., said the U.S. could be spending up to $10 billion annually as far as the eye could see. U.S. agencies largely failed to assess the price tag it would cost one of the world's poorest countries to maintain its new infrastructure, he said.

In one example, Sopko points to a 2010 report about Kabul's construction of its new 105-megawatt power plant. Kabul promised to get an outside commercial partner to cover the plant's operational costs after its completion, but that never materialized. By SIGAR’s estimation, the plant will need outside support for several years.

SIGAR found that the infrastructure projects implemented by USAID and the U.S. Force-Afghanistan in many cases failed to analyze the cost to sustain these large-scale projects. Unless the country continues to be subsidized by foreign governments, by 2015, thousands of homes in Kandahar will be in the dark without outside support, he said.

continued...http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...foxnews/politics+(Internal+-+Politics+-+Text)
 
John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan Reconstruction, at a speech Wednesday at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C., said the U.S. could be spending up to $10 billion annually as far as the eye could see. U.S. agencies largely failed to assess the price tag it would cost one of the world's poorest countries to maintain its new infrastructure, he said.

LOL.

Mr. Sopko must have missed "Military-Industrial Contracting & Accounting: Practices & Procedures" day in Special Inspector General school.

Either that, or he's teaching the class ...
 
Last edited:
If I had to guess, I'd say those ongoing costs were the primary motive behind the existence of the projects in the first place.
 
Let them build some windmills and generate their own electricity. They will keep the lights on if they know how to generate electricity cheaply. I would like a billion too, so I can aid my infrastructure. It would help Americans more than aiding Afghanistan's infrastructure. We have roads with pot holes every few feet and bridges on the verge of collapsing. We need to stop all foreign aid and fix the roads and bridges now.
 
Maybe the people don't want to pay for an umbilical chord that will cost them and their children monthly. Recurring revenue is good for those profiting from it, but creates dependents.

I'm with @RickyJ, let them build their own source of electricity if they want it.
 
Back
Top