Bill Clinton- re: Rand Paul and The Benghazi Obsessed Republican Party (mod edit)

jjdoyle

Banned
Joined
Jul 6, 2013
Messages
1,489
"In a matter of seconds, former President Clinton went on Meet The Press and showed Rand Paul and the Republican Party why hopes of winning in 2016 on Benghazi won’t work.

When David Gregory asked Clinton about Rand Paul’s claim that Benghazi disqualifies Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate, he answered, “Well, let’s go back to the first question because it’s serious. That’s not a serious comment. That’s not a serious question. Rand Paul, when ten different instances occurred when President Bush was in office where American diplomatic personnel were killed around the world. How many outraged Republican members of Congress were there? Zero.”"

Video at link, but not YouTube:
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/06...-paul-benghazi-obsessed-republican-party.html
 
I seem to remember one Congressman from Texas being outraged, Bill, while your wife championed the killing. Anyone know his name?
 
Bill and Hillary are so transparently phony. I can't believe anybody buys their crap.
 
Last edited:
I seem to remember one Congressman from Texas being outraged, Bill, while your wife championed the killing. Anyone know his name?

Probably the same guy that said he was voting for Bill's impeachment, but not because of the issues Republicans were really pushing then, but because of the foreign policy issues. I can't remember his name....
George Washington?
 
David Gregory didn't bother pointing out that Rand Paul was an opthmaologist back in Kentucky then, and how does that excuse Hillary's actions anyway?

And has David Gregory ever asked anyone why Petraeus was running arms to ISIS from Benghazi?
 
How hard was it for Hillary and Chelsea to keep up those pleased and adoring facial expressions when the camera kept panning back upon them? Barf.
 
How is that "shredding Rand Paul"?

I think his argument would have worked great back in the 90s, more people are starting to get tired of the partisan BS and people who make these kinds of arguments generally end up flailing these days.
 
I think his argument would have worked great back in the 90s, more people are starting to get tired of the partisan BS and people who make these kinds of arguments generally end up flailing these days.

Yet nothing that a nicely planned (and media supported) false flag won't cure the sheeple of.
 
And has David Gregory ever asked anyone why Petraeus was running arms to ISIS from Benghazi?

LOL Rand asked it of Billary in the committee hearing. She looked shocked and perplexed and said she would have to take the question for the record. The media (Lawrence O'Donnell, et al) called Rand a conspiracy theorist.
 
Back
Top