Ben Swann, Reality Check: The story behind the Ron Paul newsletters

I don't see anything wrong with this article, it seems like hes just out lining the facts and trying to get to the bottom of the issue. I think its safe to say though with all the facts in place, and that there were multiple people involved, its a moot point to dig deeper to find out who really wrote the letters. I just don't see how people can continue to press the issue or even stand by it. I guess some people have no logic or reasoning to their arguments lol.

But props to a reporter with an unbiased view. I have much respect for people like that.
 
Last edited:
cmm2k5 said:
I don't see anything wrong with this article, it seems like hes just out lining the facts and trying to get to the bottom of the issue. I think its safe to say though with all the facts in place, and that there were multiple people involved, its a moot point to dig deeper to find out who really wrote the letters. I just don't see how people can continue to press the issue or even stand by it. I guess some people have no logic or reasoning to their arguments lol.

But props to a reporter with an unbiased view. I have much respect for people like that.
Click to expand...
Welcome to Ron Paul Forums and there isn't anything wrong with this article haha, I posted it because it is unbiased haha.

Edit: Damn just saw this posted up in Grassroots section, sorry for the double post.
 
Last edited:
You would think RP has a copy of the newsletter. Hopefully this gets resolved soon.

oops wrong thread
 
Last edited:
Why do people suspect Rockwell? I've read this before but am not familiar of any evidence. Anyone have links?
 
Rockwell was an editor at the time.

That means he saw, and if necessary, edited articles prior to publication.

Unless he failed to do his job as editor, of course.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top