Ben Swann "Reality Check" on the Newsletters

[Tyler_Durden]

http://www.fox19.com/story/16449477/reality-check-the-story-behind-the-ron-paul-newsletters

‎"..Kirchick fails to disclose two very important things: who's name was in that byline, and which article they wrote. He only states that the mystery writer wrote "One special edition" of the Ron Paul Report. The only special edition I can find is the 1992 article, "A Special Report on Racial Terrorism." Why is that important? Because this edition of the newsletter that is most often quoted to prove racism. So does that mean the most racist evidence in these newsletters actually has someone else's name on it?
I don't know, but I'd like to find out." -- Ben Swann

Edit: I wanted to throw in the Parent Company which allows such brave and bold journalism. We need "Ben Swann's" in all of their 46 stations!
http://www.raycommedia.com/locations

 

[ShaneEnochs]

Been waiting for this for days. Thanks!

 

[PauliticsPolitics]

interesting

 

[rp713]

video is now up

 

[ShaneEnochs]

I wonder who wrote that special edition. I'm very intrigued, because whoever wrote that one may have written the other ones as well.

 

[AlexMerced]

wow... this was goooooood

 

[muh_roads]

Somebody I thought posted that article and it did have the byline? mentioned lew rockwell as the chief editor and contributor...then one other name...forget where I seen that...

 

[sailingaway]

You can watch it here if you have a facebook account and like his: http://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck

 

[nano1895]

For those watching/have watched whats the overall gist of it? (Watching now)

 

[Tyler_Durden]

You can watch it here if you have a facebook account and like his: http://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck

Don't forget the Fanpage:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ben-Swann-for-Press-Secretary-2012/242807579112438?ref=ts

 

[rideurlightning]

Very fair and unbiased reporting; in other words, REAL JOURNALISM. Ben Swann is awesome.

 

[affa]

Deleted because it quoted something removed from the op that was incorrect.

 

[The Gold Standard]

Someone here has to have a copy. Just go find it and tell us who wrote it.

 

[Immortal Technique]

not bad should this go on the youtubes?

 

[braane]

So he means to say that more than likely the author is known. Yet no one in the media came out with it. If the name is floating around here, on an internet forum, then what are the odds people who were paid to research this missed it? It's kind of late anyways, the damage has been done, but I think it's a smoking gun potentially to the medias plans to destroy Ron.

 

[undergroundrr]

I think I'm going to pass out from inhaling too much journalism.

 

[undergroundrr]

You know, Jan Mickelson on WHO-AM in Des Moines was saying the other day that he got the Ron Paul letters sent to the station. He might have a copy.

 

[goldwater's ghost]

this is a great job of journalism. this is permanentky debunked. we need to get this in the mainstream. also point out how the msm purposely hid the truth from the american people

 

[ShaneEnochs]

I think I'm going to pass out from inhaling too much journalism.

It's like freedom. It looks great from afar, but when you're not used to it, it can knock you over.

 

[blamx8]

It seems to me that the reason Kirchick and the New Republic haven't responded is they could have major liability if they deliberately withheld the Authors byline with the intent to harm Dr. Paul. This apparent malice could likely leave them defending themselves against a Defamation of Character charge. The publication of the paper with the authors name withheld, and the untrue attribution of the sentiments to Dr Paul seems to constitute a clear case of libel.
Man I hope someone, somewhere has an old copy of this that they can get to Ben Swann.