Before There Was Christian Nationalism, There Was Christian Anarchism

Occam's Banana

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
39,958
I am not a Christian, but I thought others might find this interesting (Christian or not).

(RIP @ChristianAnarchist, BTW.)

Before There Was Christian Nationalism, There Was Christian Anarchism
Rejection of the state and the use of lethal force can be found in the founding documents of Christianity.
https://reason.com/2023/06/18/before-there-was-christian-nationalism-there-was-christian-anarchism/
Cody Cook (18 June 2023)

Around the turn of the third century, an African bishop named Tertullian mused about the relationship between Christians and the state. The previous century had seen a large number of Christians martyred for refusing to recognize Caesar as divine. A few seemingly small compromises with the empire could have relieved some of the pressure on this young religious movement that worshiped a man crucified under Roman authority. But Tertullian would have none of it: "Shall [we] make an occupation of the sword [as soldiers], when the Lord proclaims that he who uses the sword shall perish by the sword?…Shall he carry a flag, too, hostile to Christ?"

Tertullian would not be a good candidate for patron saint of Christian nationalism, if there were such a thing. But his questions arguably lead directly to Christian anarchism.

Stephen Wolfe, a Christian nationalist himself, has defined his movement's goal as a "totality of national action, consisting of civil laws and social customs, conducted by a Christian nation as a Christian nation, in order to procure for itself both earthly and heavenly good in Christ." In short, Christian nationalism would use the state to enforce religious values. Christian anarchism, by contrast, rejects the state and every use of lethal force. Its rallying cry is "no king but Christ."

Christian nationalism's roots began when the Roman emperor Constantine converted to Christianity in 312 C.E.—though this predated the modern nation-state, so it isn't Christian nationalism as we usually think about it today. The nation-state would later contribute to the rise of theonomy, a Calvinist ideology holding that the state should enforce a certain understanding of God's law. Dominionism, a more broadly evangelical belief that Christians should dominate centers of power and influence, came later.

Although Christian anarchism's origin is often attributed to the Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy, its roots predate him—and Christian nationalism—by centuries. They begin with the New Testament itself.

Jesus went beyond the principle that it is immoral to initiate force, commanding his followers that they should turn the other cheek when attacked. The earliest Christians, drawing on this principle of nonviolence, saw the state as inherently violent and even demonic. In the Gospels, the devil tempts Jesus by offering him all political authority on earth, which he turns down. The Book of Revelation presents Satan as a seven-headed dragon with a crown on each head, giving ruling authority to a beastly creature that probably represented the Roman empire.

Christian anarchism's rejection of ethnic and nationalistic divisions is grounded in the Apostle Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, where he presents the kingdom of God as a spiritual nation with no walls between Jews and gentiles. Though the anarchism of the early church is more separatist than the activist Christian anarchism of some later advocates, both approaches share a rejection of violence and a commitment to Jesus' words before the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate: "My kingdom is not of this world."

This commitment often led to death, as it did with the second century Scillitan martyrs. These twelve North African believers were tried in Carthage for the crime of being Christians. When called to swear a religious oath to Caesar, one was said to respond, "I recognize not the empire of this world; but rather do I serve that God whom no man hath seen, nor with these eyes can see."

In the intervening centuries, anarchist ideas have been found among self-proclaimed Christians of many different stripes. Anabaptists emerged during the Protestant reformation as a distinct movement that sought to go back to the New Testament way of living by rejecting military service. They were so committed to voluntary faith and freedom of religion that they rejected infant baptism and re-baptized adults, reasoning that babies cannot consent to be Christians. For this unfashionable view, many were given a "third baptism" by their religious enemies: They were taken by force and drowned. The movement's descendants include the Mennonites and the Amish, the latter of which could be described as proto-Agorists for their belief in separation and communal living.

Other "restorationist" movements, such as the Churches of Christ and the Jehovah's Witnesses, were founded on the idea that Christians should go back to a time before new ideas had led the church astray. Unsurprisingly, they also often rediscovered nonviolence and anti-statism. And in the 20th century, Catholic anarchism was represented inspiringly by Dorothy Day, who opened her home to the destitute, refused to pay federal income taxes, and was jailed for her activism.

Christian anarchism also left a significant mark on less conservative and less traditional Christians, such as the philosopher Jacques Ellul. Ellul reasoned in his 1988 book Anarchy and Christianity that anarchism "seems to be the position which [is] closest to biblical thinking."

Christian nationalists dream of going back to an earlier era, a time when civics and faith seemed inseparable. The response of the Christian anarchist is, "You're not going back far enough."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cjm
Christian nationalists dream of going back to an earlier era, a time when civics and faith seemed inseparable. The response of the Christian anarchist is, "You're not going back far enough."

Bingo.

I could write a very long treatise on this topic but I won't do that, here. Here are some key points that many Christians overlook, downplay or simply ignore and this is a great disservice in the representation of the Gospel to those who do not yet believe:


1. The Bible is a book about escaping from slavery

We call the founding narrative of the ancient Israelites The Exodus. The pattern of the Exodus is deeply woven into the entire text of the Bible -- even Jesus going down to Egypt and returning from there (in order to escape Herod's infanticide) is a mini-recapitulation of the Exodus. Many other examples can be cited. Anyway, the Exodus is about a once-free people who have been enslaved in a foreign land breaking free with divine help, and ultimately entering Paradise (or, at least, an earthly portrait of what Paradise once was).

2. The purpose of the Gospel is freedom, in the good old-fashioned sense of American-freedom

"So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed." (John 8:36)

"It is for freedom that Christ has set us free." (Gal. 5:1)

"Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom." (2 Corinthians 3:17)

Romans 14 and many other passages can be mentioned which give extended teachings on the topic of the freedom of the believer in Jesus. The Gospel is The Exodus universalized. That's not just my opinion, this is the univocal position of the church down through the centuries -- the Gospel is the Exodus for all mankind, not just the Jews. It's all about freedom!

3. The Gospel is about shattering the inverted power of the many systems of violence, especially the State

When Jesus was confronted by Satan in Matthew 4:1-11, Satan offers Jesus to receive all the kingdoms of the world in exchange for bowing down and worshiping Satan. Jesus flatly rejects the offer and sends the devil packing. It is often overlooked that this is a recapitulation of the Snake in the Garden, only this time, Adam (that is, Jesus) does the right thing and tells the devil NO.

What does this have to do with statism? The disobedience of Adam in the Garden disrupted the order that God had established. You can think of it something like God is king of all creation, and he delegated rulership of the earth to Adam (see Gen. 1:28, "...rule over...") The Snake was one of the beasts of the field (3:1) which Adam was to rule over, so he was like a servant or courtier to Adam. When Adam disobeyed God, he implicitly placed the Serpent above God, and himself!

Before: God -> Adam -> Serpent
After: Serpent -> Adam -> God

What results is that Adam and Eve must be driven from Eden, into the wilderness that we presently inhabit. (They had to be driven out because God cannot give material support to death since he is Life itself.) In this present evil world (Gal. 1:4), there is murder which is an act whereby one man rules over another, in the sense of claiming total ownership of his body by destroying it (see Cain & Abel). As a result, kingships are quickly set up, and the world devolves into slavery. This is specifically called out in Revelation:

The merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over [the destroyed Whore of Babylon] because no one buys their cargoes anymore— cargoes of gold, silver, precious stones and pearls; fine linen, purple, silk and scarlet cloth; every sort of citron wood, and articles of every kind made of ivory, costly wood, bronze, iron and marble; cargoes of cinnamon and spice, of incense, myrrh and frankincense, of wine and olive oil, of fine flour and wheat; cattle and sheep; horses and carriages; and human beings sold as slaves. (Rev. 18:11-13)

The restoration of Eden will be the final and complete end of all human slavery because God's order will have been restored, in which no man can be the property of another, or the subject of another. In short, God's order is freedom (non-slavery), and man's system under the devil's thrall is universal slavery (absolutely no freedom whatsoever). The restoration of all things will be about destroying the devil's system of slavery and reinstituting God's order of freedom in Jesus the Messiah.

4. The State is nowhere spoken of positively in the Bible

The statist's favorite chapter in the entire Bible is Romans 13. The mainstream translations all choose language that, in English, conveys a very sunny tone in respect to the State. Paul refers to the agents of the State as "God's servants", who are there for our good. I won't go so far as to say that these translations are biased, but the context and significance of what Paul is really saying in the passage is frequently perverted and twisted from the pulpit (and no surprise, as the corporate-church pulpit is ultimately beholden to the State through tax-exemptions). The long and short of it is that Paul spent his whole life defying the State, and died for it, just as Jesus had done. So, Romans 13 is not at all about this Republicanized Churchianity in which the State is represented as some kind of force for social good. To borrow terminology from the game world to put it succinctly: Paul is saying that the State is lawful-neutral and so those who do evil will be punished by it, and God uses the godless opportunism of the State in enforcing natural order for our good, that is, for the good of the church and believers. But of the State itself, he has nothing good at all to say. When he says they belong to God (they are God's property), he does not mean that they are in any way good -- they are so obviously evil that this should require no explanation. Rather, he's making a point of authority -- they cannot go off God's leash because they are God's dogs! Even if God permits them to attack us as we live uprightly, it is only as a byproduct of his kingdom plans. Nothing happens by accident, and all of these things have a purpose that will be revealed.

5. Statism is the Universal Idolatry

Daniel 3 relates the story of Nebuchadnezzar's Golden Statue. Nebuchadnezzar sent out a decree to his whole kingdom, that everyone was to come and bow before this enormous statue he had built. And when the horns and instruments sounded, everyone bowed except for 3 men -- Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego. They refused to bow because they recognized that obeying the king of Babylon and bowing down before a statue of him was idolatry and forbidden by God. Just as Adam should not have bowed to the Serpent's temptation, and just as Jesus would later refuse to bow to Satan's offer of the kingdoms of the world, so these three Hebrew anarchists refused to bend the knee to the would-be demigod king of Babylon. This infuriated Nebuchadnezzar and, to make an example of them, he had them thrown in a blazing furnace. But instead of burning, they were walking around with a fourth person who theologians generally agree was a Christophany (Old Testament appearance of the pre-incarnate Jesus). They walked out unscathed and Nebuchadnezzar was humiliated for his defiance of God.

6. The State is antichrist and pictures the coming Antichrist

The prophecies of Daniel and Revelation both depict the Antichrist as a head-of-state figure, a king. The two biggest historical fulfillments of these prophecies are Antiochus IV Ephiphanes and Nero Caesar, both of which were cruel, maniacal, tyrant kings. The Antichrist will be the head of a global State and he will be even more capricious, mad and cruel than these two were.

7. The final fate of the State is that it will be personally smashed by Jesus Christ himself

Why do the nations conspire
And the peoples plot in vain?

The kings of the earth rise up
And the rulers band together
Against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,

“Let us break their chains
And throw off their shackles.”

The One enthroned in heaven laughs;
The Lord scoffs at them.
He rebukes them in his anger
And terrifies them in his wrath, saying,

“I have installed my king
On Zion, my holy mountain.”

I will proclaim the Lord’s decree:

He said to me, “You are my son;
Today I have become your father.

Ask me,
And I will make the nations your inheritance,
The ends of the earth your possession.

You will break them with a rod of iron;
You will dash them to pieces like pottery
.”

This messianic prophecy in Psalm 2 (and other related prophecies) is filled out in more detail in Revelation 19:17-21:

And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings, generals, and the mighty, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, great and small.”

Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to wage war against the rider on the horse and his army. But the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who had performed the signs on its behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur. The rest were killed with the sword coming out of the mouth of the rider on the horse, and all the birds gorged themselves on their flesh.

It's kind of an anti-climactic end for such a terrifying group of thugs who wreak so much havoc over the whole world. But that's the point -- like using an iron rod to smash clay pottery, that is how overpowering the final judgment of the Son of God upon the State and its many agents will be. Prophecy says they will melt away where they stand. They will offer no more resistance to the power of Jesus returned in flaming vengeance than a gnat trapped on the surface of the water can offer to an oil tanker.

That's the full-throated message of the Old Fashioned Gospel. Anyone who has actually read their Bible can immediately differentiate between the anemic, gutless, powerless "gospel" of the mainline corporate churches -- government lackeys all of them -- and what the Bible plainly says about the State, its future, and the freedom of God's good order in Eden, which will be restored by Jesus in the New Heavens and the New Earth when he creates the world again, as it was done in Genesis.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cjm
I am not a Christian, but I thought others might find this interesting (Christian or not).

(RIP @ChristianAnarchist, BTW.)

Before There Was Christian Nationalism, There Was Christian Anarchism
Rejection of the state and the use of lethal force can be found in the founding documents of Christianity.
https://reason.com/2023/06/18/before-there-was-christian-nationalism-there-was-christian-anarchism/
Cody Cook (18 June 2023)

Around the turn of the third century, an African bishop named Tertullian mused about the relationship between Christians and the state. The previous century had seen a large number of Christians martyred for refusing to recognize Caesar as divine. A few seemingly small compromises with the empire could have relieved some of the pressure on this young religious movement that worshiped a man crucified under Roman authority. But Tertullian would have none of it: "Shall [we] make an occupation of the sword [as soldiers], when the Lord proclaims that he who uses the sword shall perish by the sword?…Shall he carry a flag, too, hostile to Christ?"

Tertullian would not be a good candidate for patron saint of Christian nationalism, if there were such a thing. But his questions arguably lead directly to Christian anarchism.

Stephen Wolfe, a Christian nationalist himself, has defined his movement's goal as a "totality of national action, consisting of civil laws and social customs, conducted by a Christian nation as a Christian nation, in order to procure for itself both earthly and heavenly good in Christ." In short, Christian nationalism would use the state to enforce religious values. Christian anarchism, by contrast, rejects the state and every use of lethal force. Its rallying cry is "no king but Christ."

Christian nationalism's roots began when the Roman emperor Constantine converted to Christianity in 312 C.E.—though this predated the modern nation-state, so it isn't Christian nationalism as we usually think about it today. The nation-state would later contribute to the rise of theonomy, a Calvinist ideology holding that the state should enforce a certain understanding of God's law. Dominionism, a more broadly evangelical belief that Christians should dominate centers of power and influence, came later.

Although Christian anarchism's origin is often attributed to the Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy, its roots predate him—and Christian nationalism—by centuries. They begin with the New Testament itself.

Jesus went beyond the principle that it is immoral to initiate force, commanding his followers that they should turn the other cheek when attacked. The earliest Christians, drawing on this principle of nonviolence, saw the state as inherently violent and even demonic. In the Gospels, the devil tempts Jesus by offering him all political authority on earth, which he turns down. The Book of Revelation presents Satan as a seven-headed dragon with a crown on each head, giving ruling authority to a beastly creature that probably represented the Roman empire.

Christian anarchism's rejection of ethnic and nationalistic divisions is grounded in the Apostle Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, where he presents the kingdom of God as a spiritual nation with no walls between Jews and gentiles. Though the anarchism of the early church is more separatist than the activist Christian anarchism of some later advocates, both approaches share a rejection of violence and a commitment to Jesus' words before the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate: "My kingdom is not of this world."

This commitment often led to death, as it did with the second century Scillitan martyrs. These twelve North African believers were tried in Carthage for the crime of being Christians. When called to swear a religious oath to Caesar, one was said to respond, "I recognize not the empire of this world; but rather do I serve that God whom no man hath seen, nor with these eyes can see."

In the intervening centuries, anarchist ideas have been found among self-proclaimed Christians of many different stripes. Anabaptists emerged during the Protestant reformation as a distinct movement that sought to go back to the New Testament way of living by rejecting military service. They were so committed to voluntary faith and freedom of religion that they rejected infant baptism and re-baptized adults, reasoning that babies cannot consent to be Christians. For this unfashionable view, many were given a "third baptism" by their religious enemies: They were taken by force and drowned. The movement's descendants include the Mennonites and the Amish, the latter of which could be described as proto-Agorists for their belief in separation and communal living.

Other "restorationist" movements, such as the Churches of Christ and the Jehovah's Witnesses, were founded on the idea that Christians should go back to a time before new ideas had led the church astray. Unsurprisingly, they also often rediscovered nonviolence and anti-statism. And in the 20th century, Catholic anarchism was represented inspiringly by Dorothy Day, who opened her home to the destitute, refused to pay federal income taxes, and was jailed for her activism.

Christian anarchism also left a significant mark on less conservative and less traditional Christians, such as the philosopher Jacques Ellul. Ellul reasoned in his 1988 book Anarchy and Christianity that anarchism "seems to be the position which [is] closest to biblical thinking."

Christian nationalists dream of going back to an earlier era, a time when civics and faith seemed inseparable. The response of the Christian anarchist is, "You're not going back far enough."

Thank you, Occam's Banana, for that article by theologian Cody Cook.

For those who would like much more on this matter, see my following article, which demonstrates the logically unavoidable anarchism of Jesus Christ's teachings as recorded in the New Testament (in addition to analyzing their context in relation to his actions, to the Tanakh, and to his apostles). It is logically complete on this subject, in the sense of its apodixis.

* James Redford, "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), 60 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, https://archive.org/download/JesusIsAnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf , http://www.freezepage.com/1560442613QRSDHGPCAM , https://megalodon.jp/2019-0614-0116...AnAnarchist/Redford-Jesus-Is-an-Anarchist.pdf .

Additionally, Occam's Banana, you state that you are not a Christian. I invite you and others to read my following article:

* James Redford, "God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics", Theophysics: The Physics of God, May 16, 2022, https://jamesredford.substack.com/p/gods-existence-is-proven-by-several , https://www.minds.com/blog/view/1373133123700658189 , https://steemit.com/cosmology/@jame...mathematical-theorems-within-standard-physics .

"Mentallo & The Fixer - Crypto-Anarchist (1997)", mysteriuminiquitatis, Aug. 8, 2020

Mirrors: https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/HCWyeUEfnjk , https://web.archive.org/web/20230706052852/https://files.catbox.moe/o18sx2.mp4 , https://www.freezepage.com/1688621255OTIHWYOUPA .
 
Back
Top