Article claims Rand's anti-sexist comment about Hillary was actually itself sexist

jct74

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
14,304
This is so ridiculous. He was specifically asked (twice) about his "issue" with women and if he would "pull his punches" with Hillary because she was a woman. He said no and that he would treat her just he would treat a man. And somehow this comment is now being spun as itself sexist.

Rand Paul Comments On Respecting Hillary Clinton The Same Way As A Man Actually Is Sexist In Itself

BECCA STANEK
1 HOUR AGO

According to Rand Paul, there’s one thing about Hillary Clinton that certainly wouldn’t stop him in the 2016 presidential elections: her gender. In an interview aired Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Paul said that, if he encounters Clinton on the 2016 campaign trail, he’d treat her “with the same respect that I would treat a man.” Paul then continued to tell the show’s host Dana Bash that the notion that Clinton “deserves not to be treated as aggressively because she’s only a woman” would be “sexist.”

While Paul might have thought he was being progressive and open-minded by making that point, the fact that he thought it necessary to say he would not treat Clinton differently because of her gender actually alludes to the contrary. Clinton has proven time and time again to be completely capable in the political sphere — just as countless women have — and gender should be an afterthought to that capability, if a thought at all.

In fact, Paul shouldn’t treat Clinton with the respect with which he would treat a man. He should simply treat her with respect, period. Throughout her career and throughout her presidential campaigning thus far, Clinton hasn’t asked to be treated differently, or less aggressively because of her gender. That notion is one that Paul came up with on his own, and his mentioning of it seems to show he still holds — at least somewhere in the back of his mind — a stereotypical image of the delicate, sensitive woman who cannot handle entering a “man’s” world.

...

h ttp://www.bustle.com/articles/75761-rand-paul-comments-on-respecting-hillary-clinton-the-same-way-as-a-man-actually-is-sexist
 
Last edited:
Lol, it doesn't matter how he responds to someone who sees everything through that prism.
 
While Paul might have thought he was being progressive and open-minded by making that point, the fact that he thought it necessary to say he would not treat Clinton differently because of her gender actually alludes to the contrary.

No, I don't think he thought he was being "progressive." Lol. That would imply he was resorting to douche-baggery. Such as the view expressed in this article.
 
Here's the video.




He gets asked about treating Hillary differently, not once but twice, starting at 5:00. He finally gives an answer "no, I'd treat her like a man", and now that's "sexist". LOL.



.
 
Back
Top