alt-right racism is Ron Paul's fault (Salon article)

undergroundrr

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
3,334
It's not over yet. They're still after Ron Paul. Don't read this on a full stomach. -

h ttp://www.salon.com/2016/12/09/how-the-alt-right-became-racist-part-2-long-before-trump-white-nationalists-flocked-to-ron-paul/

In our next installment, Ron Paul's presidential campaign becomes the breeding ground for 50 shades of cray-cray
MATTHEW SHEFFIELD

How the alt-right became racist, part 2: Long before Trump, white nationalists flocked to Ron Paul
(Credit: AP/Reuters/Salon)
Read the first installment of “How the alt-right became racist” here.

While future neo-Nazi Richard Spencer was struggling with white nationalism in the world of political journalism, most of the people who would later comprise the alt-right’s online shock-troops were involved in a different venture. They were fighting hard to make former Texas congressman Ron Paul the Republican presidential nominee, first in 2008 and again in 2012. It’s more than uncanny how many current alt-right leaders backed the former Texas congressman in his quixotic bids to stop GOP mainstream candidates John McCain and Mitt Romney.

Pretty much all of the top personalities at the Right Stuff, a neo-Nazi troll mecca, started off as conventional libertarians and Paul supporters, according to the site’s creator, an anonymous man who goes by the name “Mike Enoch.”

“We were all libertarians back in the day. I mean, everybody knows this,” he said on an alt-right podcast last month. After Paul’s second campaign failed, he completely disengaged from politics, he added.

Paul was also the favorite of Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer, the two men who created the term “alternative right” and formed the annual conference where old-school right-wing racists met and mentored young and disaffected conservative intellectuals.

The Texas congressman was also the preferred candidate of Jared Taylor and the readers of his white nationalist website American Renaissance.

That feeling of admiration was apparently mutual. In the 1990s, Paul repeatedly promoted Taylor in his famously racist newsletters as part of a “paleo-libertarian” strategy designed to attract racist white people. (Paul subsequently denied writing them, however.) Later on, American Renaissance wrote a featured article stating that “the race-realist section of the blogosphere is one of the most enthusiastic sources of support for Mr. Paul” and praised his “good instincts on race,” despite the fact that the author believed that Paul was no longer interested in catering to overt racists, as he formerly had.

Paul had non-racist supporters as well who would later become alt-right figures. (The self-described neo-Nazi types refer to them as “alt-lite.”)

Libertarian radio host Alex Jones of InfoWars, a man famous for his belief in “lizard people” and his elaborate 9/11 conspiracy theories, dislikes being identified with the alt-right. But he is an important figure in the movement’s history, and a key link from Ron Paul to Donald Trump.

Today Jones is known today as an ardent Trump supporter but his affection for Ron Paul and his son, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, was even greater during their respective presidential campaigns. In 2016, Jones and his team supported the younger Paul for the GOP nomination until the very end of Rand Paul’s short-lived bid.

Shortly after Trump declared his candidacy, Jones’s top lieutenant created his own anti-Trump conspiracy theory in which he declared the former television star to be a “stooge” for Democrats, designed to make the GOP lose to Hillary Clinton. Later, in January of 2016 shortly before the Iowa caucuses, a distraught Jones pleaded with Paul about any possible strategy to save his campaign.

“I’d really like to see you as president,” Jones said. “How do we get you elected president?”

In the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, Ron Paul was also by far the preferred presidential candidate of the racist “Politically Incorrect” board known as /pol/ on 4chan. Throughout both of his unsuccessful runs, the forum served as a critical organizing portal and talent incubator for Paul’s youthful, tech-savvy supporters to pull off fundraising and digital feats that many political observers incorrectly attributed to Paul’s official campaign staff.

The energy and enthusiasm of /pol/ and its associated imitators and rivals completely disappeared after Ron Paul’s candidacies ended. He did manage to become a meme within the site, however. The digital shock troops who would later become the alt-right were waiting for someone to re-energize them.

Rand Paul’s staff hoped that he’d be able to build on his father’s success in 2016. It didn’t happen, however. In some part, that was because the senator couldn’t galvanize the emergent alt-right after he started pushing anti-racist policies and rhetoric.

It was a road the younger Paul headed down after he faced an uproar in 2010 for saying that he opposed the Civil Rights Act’s public accommodation provision, which requires most private businesses to serve customers regardless of their race. Paul retracted the stance and began a minority outreach program. He also began telling his fellow Republicans that they could not remain a party exclusively for white people.

“If we’re going to be the white party, we’re going to be the losing party,” Sen. Paul said in 2014, at an event commemorating the 50th anniversary of the law.

He has stuck to his new position, even in Republican presidential debates. Paul has repeatedly embraced the campaign to equalize criminal sentencing, particularly for drug offenses, between whites and nonwhites. He has also called for police to wear body cameras when on patrol and for local governments to stop using law enforcement as a revenue generator, both positions favored by Black Lives Matter activists and mainstream libertarians like those at Reason magazine.

None of that went unnoticed by the online racists who formerly supported his father, especially since they had found a new champion in Donald Trump, after he descended his golden elevator and denounced Mexico for sending drug dealers and rapists across the American border. As one of them put it on his personal blog:

Ron Paul’s performance in the 2008 and 2012 elections was due to disaffected voters, including many White Nationalists who supported him, not ideological libertarians. All those people have since abandoned Rand Paul and thrown their support behind Donald Trump because of his foolish decision to go “mainstream.”

With 16 other Republican candidates competing in the Iowa caucuses, Paul’s loss of the white nationalists doomed his chances in the Hawkeye State, where every sliver of vote share mattered greatly. In the words of an anonymous Paul campaign strategist quoted by Politico: “Trump got in, Trump zoomed ahead, we collapsed, he had a massive impact in caging our people from us.”

In Part 3: How the American conservative movement paved the way for white nationalism by embracing the Christian right

Unfortunately the libertarians aren't representing well in the comments. More alt-righters there than real libertarians and they're predictably either impenetrably nerdy or awkward and inarticulate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's great that so many "liberty" people defected from the Ron/Rand movement and started glombing on to white nationalism.

It's better that they did it now so freedom fighters know of another front they must fight against for eventual freedom.
 
It's interesting that some in the media have decided that this is a good time to attack Ron and Rand. Why would that be?
 
I think it's great that so many "liberty" people defected from the Ron/Rand movement and started glombing on to white nationalism.

It's better that they did it now so freedom fighters know of another front they must fight against for eventual freedom.

It's more like many Paul supporters defected from the broader liberty grassroots movement that fostered them, and started glombing for their own version of the very elitism that they were supposed to be fighting against. We went from a unified grassroots under one umbrella, inclusively tolerating the varied members of the coalition, to a "oh we can't we can't be too associated with truthers/birthers/tax honesty, or Tea Partiers/socons/10th amendment etc people" mindset that presumed the the grassroots must be top-down managed, instead of itself managing the movement.

Instead of embracing the populist end of the movement as expressed by the growth of the alternative media, they buy into and repeat the same smears and false narratives the MSM use to try to remarginalize it (e.g., wholesale dismissing the alt right as "white nationalist" or other forms of deplorable). Don't they understand the whole point of the old media creating the devil figure is to then "link" everybody and everything else they don't like (such as the Pauls) to the devil figure? The whole point is to stay in control of declaring what is deemed "mainstream" and what is not.
 
It is the freakin' skinhead faction that was here back then,, attaching themselves to Ron's Name.

Some never left.
 
Hard truth time: There were white nationalists who were supporting Ron. Not because he was racist, but because they saw him as being the best candidate to loosen government laws and allow them to be more racist. Which, if we are honest with each other, he was. That is because we here recognize this truth: Has long as you aren't hurting others, you have a right to be a racist a$$hole.

The issue is that white nationalists eventually realized that instead of trying to get rid of government, which would open the way for as much anti-racist actions as it would racist ones, and embracing libertarian ideology, which if widely accepted would mean the end of their racism and nationalism, they just needed to embrace government. Us eit for their ends instead of the "enemy's" cause. The white nationalists constructed the Alt. Left and got Trump elected because he sounded like them, or at least gave them voice enough they were drawn to him.
 
I think it's great that so many "liberty" people defected from the Ron/Rand movement and started glombing on to white nationalism.

It's better that they did it now so freedom fighters know of another front they must fight against for eventual freedom.

If only they had left earlier.
 
That said...blarg blarg racist...blarg blarg xenophobe blarg blarg...homophobe...blarg blarg sexist...blarg blarg islamophobe...

Do not care anymore.

That's all they got, and even if you were the most "anti racist" person on the face of the earth, if you espoused limited government and free markets and free associations, you'd be called racist and blarg blarg blarg.

Fuck 'em all.

If Ron Paul created one "racist", assholes like the one posted in the OP created a legion of them, simply because of blowback.

Because of assholes like the one posted in the OP, we've also been set back 30 years in the battle against out of control cops, simply because the SJWs had to make it strictly about race and "white privilege".

Because of that, I have a special, hot hatred for every one of them, and their fellow travelers.
 
It's more like many Paul supporters defected from the broader liberty grassroots movement that fostered them, and started glombing for their own version of the very elitism that they were supposed to be fighting against.

We went from a unified grassroots under one umbrella, inclusively tolerating the varied members of the coalition, to a "oh we can't we can't be too associated with truthers/birthers/tax honesty, or Tea Partiers/socons/10th amendment etc people" mindset that presumed the the grassroots must be top-down managed, instead of itself managing the movement.

Instead of embracing the populist end of the movement as expressed by the growth of the alternative media, they buy into and repeat the same smears and false narratives the MSM use to try to remarginalize it (e.g., wholesale dismissing the alt right as "white nationalist" or other forms of deplorable). Don't they understand the whole point of the old media creating the devil figure is to then "link" everybody and everything else they don't like (such as the Pauls) to the devil figure? The whole point is to stay in control of declaring what is deemed "mainstream" and what is not.

Oh boy this...this...this.
 
“If you’re not catching flak you’re not over the target”
 
they're gunning after Ron? Progressives are a sick bunch. Now I am personally glad that Trump won.

I think the liberal arguments are losing credibility across the board. People just aren't quite buying it as much. Almost seems to be sinking with the main stream media, to which they are somewhat attached. The guilt by association thing just isn't a very good argument and people seem to know it. And the liberal arguments seem to cause one to get their ass kicked in a general Presidential election.
 
Back
Top