Alabama Democrats abolish DNC-mandated LGBTQ, youth caucuses

jmdrake

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
51,888
[MENTION=28167]Occam's Banana[/MENTION] does this count as "auto woke cannibalism?"

https://www.al.com/news/2023/05/alabama-dems-abolish-dnc-mandated-lgbtq-youth-caucuses.html

This is an opinion column.

If this is how the Alabama Democratic Party functions, perhaps it’s better that Republicans control Alabama.

And with this level of dysfunction within the Alabama Democratic Party, Republicans always will.

On Saturday, the state party’s executive committee met, in a manner of speaking. It’s not clear a quorum was present, and at least a couple of dozen committee members were turned away,

Next, the party voted to abolish several caucuses by a vote count that appears to have been made up and doesn’t come close to pictures of the standing vote taken by a reporter.

Youth caucus — gone.

LGBTQ caucus — gone.

Disable caucus— gone.

Until today, those caucuses had the power to nominate at-large members to ensure representation proportionate to Alabama Democratic voters.

But not anymore. The party’s Black caucus, controlled by the Alabama Democratic Conference and led by state party boss Joe Reed, had opposed the other caucuses, which dilute ADC’s influence on the executive committee.

“What happened today — what the leadership of the Alabama Democratic Party did — was to essentially say that we don’t represent the Democratic electorate in Alabama anymore,” former U.S. Senator Doug Jones said after the meeting.

In a state where Republicans pass tougher and tougher voting restrictions every legislative session, the Alabama Democratic Party has responded by enacting its own sort of poll tax. At least two dozen executive committee members were turned away, having been told they had not paid a $50 qualifying fee they say they were not warned about.

One of those folks who was turned away, Youth Caucus member Haley Czarnek, told me she offered to pay $50 cash on the spot but was told she couldn’t. Then she was told she couldn’t vote as an executive committee member — a committee she has sat on three times in the last year — because she hadn’t paid.

On the other side of this power struggle within the Alabama Democratic Party are party boss Joe Reed and his ally, party chairman Randy Kelley.

“I walked up to the podium and gave the chair my $50 directly and asked him if I would be allowed to vote, and Joe Reed told me that I would not,” Czarnek said. “And he told the entire party that you cannot buy your way into the meeting, which is the same meeting at which I was told the reason why I wasn’t going to be seated was because I hadn’t paid.”

In 2019, the Democratic National Committee ordered the state to pass new bylaws, which created new caucuses for party constituent groups, including youth, LGBTQ and Latinos, among others.

“We never should’ve even changed the bylaws,” Reed said Saturday.

Ever since Reed’s faction won back control of the party last August, the executive committee has attempted to repeal the bylaws the Reed faction doesn’t like.

Those new caucuses initially brought enough new faces into the party’s executive committee that Reed’s group, which controls a majority (but not all) of the Black caucus, lost control.

But last year, Reed eked out a narrow victory in party elections, and since then he and his allies have been trying to chip away at their opposition. In previous party meetings, Reed has flirted with changing the bylaws but stopped short.

On Saturday, they went the full distance.

Supposedly, the executive committee repealed the DNC-mandated bylaws on a 63-49 vote, but photos taken by Alabama Reflector reporter Alander Rocha cast doubt.


In those photos, about 20 committee members can be seen standing in support of the motion. More than 30 stood to vote against the measure.

When committee members asked the chairman for a roll-call vote, Kelley refused.

By repealing the bylaws, the party will no longer ensure that minority groups, other than the Black caucus, are proportionately represented on the executive committee.

“If you look at the numbers, I don’t even think they had a quorum for the committee,” Jones said. “This was the action of the same small cabal that has essentially destroyed the party for a long time, and now they’re hellbent on continuing to do it.”

Intra-party power struggles aside, Alabama Democrats have shown few signs of life in recent months as simple party functions like messaging have ceased. The party’s social media accounts have been dormant since Kelley became party chair last August and the party has not capitalized on unforced Republican errors, like when the GOP party chairman admitted last year to having voted with an ID he made himself.

When vice-chair Tabitha Isner offered to run the social media accounts for the party last year, Kelley accused her of trying to usurp control.

Jones said the decisions made today wouldn’t go unchallenged, but he declined to say what form a challenge would take.

“I think it effectively kills the Democratic Party in Alabama if it stands,” Jones said.This is an opinion column.
 
Last edited:
@Occam's Banana does this count as "auto woke cannibalism?"

I'm not sure. It depends.

If the state party leadership, executive committee, & black caucus are "woke", then yes, this is "woke autocannibalism".

But if they're just "old guard" power players securing their turf against the DNC's "woke" bylaw requirements, then I would say it is not.

I'm guessing it's not - based on the article, the leadership & black caucus don't appear to be enthusiastic about sharing power & influence in the state party with the "Youth", "LGBTQ", & "Disabled" caucuses. It's an interesting development in any case (maybe the Democrats in Alabama are starting to get fed up ...).

(Also, you seem to have pasted the article twice - halfway through your post, the whole thing repeats.)
 
I'm not sure. It depends.

If the state party leadership, executive committee, & black caucus are "woke", then yes, this is "woke autocannibalism".

But if they're just "old guard" power players securing their turf against the DNC's "woke" bylaw requirements, then I would say it is not.

I'm guessing it's not - based on the article, the leadership & black caucus don't appear to be enthusiastic about sharing power & influence in the state party with the "Youth", "LGBTQ", & "Disabled" caucuses. It's an interesting development in any case (maybe the Democrats in Alabama are starting to get fed up ...).

Gotcha. So woke auto cannibalism is when the woke aren't woke enough. Yeah...I read this as an old guard power grab too. (But I do know there are black democrats who aren't crazy about liberal social issues but know they can't come out and say that.)

(Also, you seem to have pasted the article twice - halfway through your post, the whole thing repeats.)

Ooops! I fixed that.
 
Gotcha. So woke auto cannibalism is when the woke aren't woke enough.

Yes. Specifically, it's when one woke person or group isn't "woke" enough to suit some other woke person or group - or is considered by some other woke person or group to be "woke" in the "wrong" way. Both persons or groups have to be "woke", or else it isn't "autocannibalistic". (In this particular case, the state party leadership and black caucus don't appear to be "woke", since if they were, rather than trying to eliminate things like the "LGBTQ" caucus, they'd probably be trying to take over and control them so they could exploit them for purposes of pandering, influence peddling, and virtue signaling.)

(But I do know there are black democrats who aren't crazy about liberal social issues but know they can't come out and say that.)

That's the sense I got from the article.
 
Would be great if this starts a trend and Democrats in other states start abolishing these kinds of caucuses.
 
If alabama wants to be really " progressive" the dems should vote to disolve the party. Until then its just the same ol' douche bags. I find it humorous of course that the slaver party has a black caucus on a state level but batshit crazy and disturbing that there is one on a national level
 
Alabama Democrat chair cases LGBTQ caucus a racist plot to dilute black vote

https://www.al.com/news/2023/06/ala...from-doug-jones-to-weaken-the-black-vote.html

Alabama Democrat chairman: LGBTQ, youth caucuses a ‘racist plot’ from Doug Jones ‘to weaken the Black vote’
Published: Jun. 14, 2023, 3:43 p.m.
US-POLITICS-CORONAVIRUS-HEARING
Senator Doug Jones asks a question during a US Senate Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing to examine Covid-19, focusing on an update on the federal response in Washington, DC, on September 23, 2020. (Photo by Alex Edelman / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ALEX EDELMAN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)POOL/AFP via Getty Images

facebook
twitter


By Paul Gattis | [email protected]
The chair of the Alabama Democratic Party, in a letter Tuesday, vilified the state’s most successful Democratic politician of the past decade as intra-party squabbling continues.

In the letter, Chair Randy Kelley said he was combatting “misinformation” in the aftermath of state Democrats changing its bylaws last month.

In defending those changes, Kelley took aim at former U.S. Sen. Doug Jones – who served from 2017-2020 -- as well as Thomas Perez, the former chair of the Democratic National Committee.

Specifically, Kelley charged that – in pushing for multiple new caucuses -- Jones and Perez were engaged in a “racist plot to divide, dilute, undermine and weaken the Black vote” on the State Democratic Executive Committee.


The SDEC eliminated those new caucuses in May, removing their authority to nominate at-large members to ensure representation proportionate to Alabama Democratic voters.

Neither Jones nor Perez immediately responded Wednesday to a request for comment.

The caucuses removed last month ended specific representation for LGBTQ+, people with disabilities and young people (ages 18-35).

“Because an unshakeable and unified Black vote elected Nancy Worley chair and me as vice chair of the Alabama Democratic Party against the objections of Doug Jones and Thomas Perez in 2018, this racially motivated plot was hatched to nullify the gains made by Black Democrats in the settlement of the Hawthorne v. Baker case,” Kelley wrote.

“It was wrong then and it continued to be wrong until we corrected it in the newly adopted bylaws.”

Democrats hold no statewide office in Alabama and Republicans maintain a supermajority in both chambers of the state legislature. Jones surprised Roy Moore in the 2017 special Senate election with a narrow victory in the aftermath of sexual abuse charges against Moore.

Moore has repeatedly denied the allegations.

Kelley’s addressed his two-page letter to Jaime Harrison, chair of the DNC, as well as other DNC leaders and the SDEC. The DNC in 2019 ordered Alabama Democrats to change its bylaws that led to the creation of the new caucuses.

Following the Alabama Democrats changes last month, Harrison said in a tweet he was troubled and that the DNC was looking into it.


In responding in the letter to what he described as “misinformation,” Kelley wrote, “Because a lie unanswered is a lie believed. The best way to kill a lie is to tell the truth. No lie should live forever.”

Other issues covered by Kelley was the representation of youth/young adults in the party as well as representation of LGBTQ+ and denying the qualifying fee for SDEC elections is a “poll tax” along with the establishment of standing committees.

“We are committed to ensuring that the minority will be heard but we are equally committed that the majority will prevail,” Kelley wrote.

“If the DNC would treat Alabama like it treats the other states, we could eventually build a strong and effective Democratic Party in Alabama, second to none. ‘Let not your heart be troubled.’

“Please understand that we cannot fight the Republicans during the daytime and fight Democrats at night and build a successful Democratic Party.”
 
Back
Top