AL/CA/IA/MS/MT/NJ/NM/SD Election Day Thread - 6/3

MichaelDavis

Banned
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
965
Alabama: Chad Mathis (AL-06)
California: Tim Donnelly (CA-Gov), Igor Birman (CA-07), Greg Raths (CA-45), Carl DeMaio (CA-52)
Iowa: Matt Whitaker (IA-Sen), Rod Blum (IA-01), Brad Zaun (IA-03)
Mississippi: Chris McDaniel (MS-Sen), Tavish Kelly (MS-04)
Montana: Matt Rosendale (MT-AL)
New Jersey: Muray Sabrin (NJ-Sen), Steve Lonegan (NJ-03)
New Mexico: David Clements (NM-Sen)
South Dakota: Stace Nelson (SD-Sen)
 
Last edited:
Is Joni Ernst the best candidate? I have not looked into the Iowa Senate candidates much.
 
Why Chad Mathis?

I'm supporting Scott Beason.

Mathis has been endorsed by FreedomWorks, Club for Growth, Senate Conservatives Funds, Madison Project, RedState, Citizens United, and U.S. Senator Mike Lee. Why are you supporting Beason?
 
Mathis has been endorsed by FreedomWorks, Club for Growth, Senate Conservatives Funds, Madison Project, RedState, Citizens United, and U.S. Senator Mike Lee. Why are you supporting Beason?

I don't have much info on Mathis other than his plan to fix Obamacare; other than that, he hasn't really said much. All he's really done is put out attack ads, so much so that 3 of the other candidates held a joint presser last week to denounce his "lies."

Beason is a known quantity that is on record with a lot of issues. Not perfect, but he's pretty good. Our local political talk show has been having candidates on and I got to question Beason and really liked one of his responses and disliked 1, but I at least got them out of him straight.

He (Beason) said he was not in favor of legalizing marijuana at the federal level. I asked "if you're elected, you will have to vote on the patriot act sunsets next year, how would you?" He said he would vote against them, the patriot act at large, and would work to abolish the NSA entirely.
 
Joni Ernst is NOT a liberty candidate. There is no liberty candidate for US Senator from Iowa. The best of the bunch would be Sam Clovis or Matt Whitaker but they both fall short.

You should add Brad Zaun IA-3. He has been endorsed by Liberty Iowa PAC, and every Paul supporter I know in IA-3 is supporting him.

There are also at least 4 liberty candidates running for state assembly in Iowa.
 
CALIFORNIA:

LIBERTY CANDIDATES:

US HOUSE:
California 4th:
Tom McClintock (incumbent)
http://www.tommcclintock.com
California 7th:
Igor Birman (running)
http://igorbirman.com
California 8th:
Paul Hannosh (running)
http://www.paulhannosh.com
California 12th:
John Dennis (running)
http://www.johndennisforcongress.com
California 16th:
Johnny Tacherra (running)
http://www.johnnyforcongress.com
California 32nd:
Art Alas (running)
www.electalas.com
California 47th:
Andy Wallon (running)
http://andywhallon.com
California 50th:
California 52nd:
Carl DeMaio (running)
http://carldemaio.com

California 2nd Assembly District:
Matt Heath (running)
http://heathforassembly.com
California 9th Assembly District:
Manuel Martin (running)
http://manuelforassembly.com
California 46th Assembly District:
Zachary Taylor (running)
http://www.electzacharytaylor.com

FELLOW TRAVELERS:

US HOUSE:
California 1st:
Doug LeMalfa (running)-Fellow traveler
http://www.douglamalfa.com
California 5th:
Stewart Cilley (running)-Fellow traveler
https://www.facebook.com/StewartCilleyForCongress2012
California 53rd:
Joel Marchese(running)-Fellow traveler
http://www.joelforcongress2014.org

STATE AND LOCAL:
Calfornia State Assembly 38th:
Eusebio Preciado (running)-Fellow traveler
http://www.preciado2014.com
 
more in Iowa:
Kevin Wolfswinkel IA House 1
Jeff Shipley IA House 82
Shawn Dietz IA Senate 27

Fellow Traveler:
Mark Chelgren IA Senate 41
 
Joni Ernst is NOT a liberty candidate. There is no liberty candidate for US Senator from Iowa. The best of the bunch would be Sam Clovis or Matt Whitaker but they both fall short.

You should add Brad Zaun IA-3. He has been endorsed by Liberty Iowa PAC, and every Paul supporter I know in IA-3 is supporting him.

There are also at least 4 liberty candidates running for state assembly in Iowa.

Is there anything that makes Zaun a better candidate than Schultz? FreedomWorks and Senate Conservatives Fund have endorsed Schultz, but he endorsed Rick Santorum for president, which is very questionable. Normally, I would trust FreedomWorks' endorsement, but after the Nebraska senate debacle, I have less trust.
 
Is there anything that makes Zaun a better candidate than Schultz? FreedomWorks and Senate Conservatives Fund have endorsed Schultz, but he endorsed Rick Santorum for president, which is very questionable. Normally, I would trust FreedomWorks' endorsement, but after the Nebraska senate debacle, I have less trust.

Schultz supports farm subsidies, the minimum wage, and medicare. I'm not an expert on the IA-3 race. My understanding is he would be the next best option, perhaps. Zaun has a firm understanding of the constitution but won't budge on supporting the elderly, the disabled, and veterans.

Liberty Iowa http://www.libertyiowa.com/ which was founded by Paul supporters I know, has endorsed Brad Zaun. This gives him priority status in my view. I trust their endorsement over that of an out of state organization.
 
Last edited:
Schultz supports farm subsidies, the minimum wage, and medicare. I'm not an expert on the IA-3 race. My understanding is he would be the next best option, perhaps. Zaun has a firm understanding of the constitution but won't budge on supporting the elderly, the disabled, and veterans.

Liberty Iowa http://www.libertyiowa.com/ which was founded by Paul supporters I know, has endorsed Brad Zaun. This gives him priority status in my view. I trust their endorsement over that of an out of state organization.

Schultz says he opposed the Farm Bill because it was 80% food stamps and says states should decide their own minimum wage, not the federal government. Do you have a link where it says he supports farm subsidies? Medicare is very popular, especially with older voters. As long as he supports Medicare reform, I don't see that as a negative. I'm disappointing that neither returned their Campaign for Liberty survey.

http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2014/05/kcci-iowa-3rd-congressional-district-race-live-blog/
 
Huh, I started to see political lawn signs everywhere a few days ago, but I had no idea there was an election in Mordor (aka NJ) tomorrow.

I believe David Larson is running against incumbent "Liberal" Leonard Lance. Regardless, anyone but Lance...
 
Mark Potts sheriff Trinity County.

Deputy Potts Can’t Be Silenced


Kym Kemp / Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2012 @ 9:23 a.m. / News





According to a recent court ruling, law enforcement officials cannot be silenced or reprimanded for speaking out against the drug war. A Trinity County Deputy who made national news when he sued the County for restricting him from sending letters to the editor about subjects which included the opinion that “drug laws, just like Prohibition, have given rise to a black market and created the Mexican Drug Cartels” has received an injunction protecting his free speech rights.

Trinity County Deputy Mark Potts worked narcotics from 2008 to 2011 and the perspective he gained gave him concerns about the drug war. During that time he was assigned to the Narcotics Investigations Unit, where, he said, “I focused on marijuana enforcement.” Even earlier though, Potts wrote letters to the local paper, The Trinity Journal. Letters he described in his court papers as “generally themed around the Constitution, related laws, and how we have gotten very far away from the original intent of the Constitution.”

The District Attorney of Trinity County expressed concern about some of Potts’ letters might affect his testimony in court. In a sworn declaration, the former sheriff of Trinity County, Lorrac Craig, stated


When I was Sheriff, District Attorney Michael Harper approached me about Mark’s letters to the editor and urged me to restrain Mark from writing any letters to the newspaper. District Attorney Harper expressed to me his concern that if Mark testified in a criminal case that he had investigated, his letters to the editor might become an issue in the trial, I told the District Attorney that if it actually came up in a case, I was sure Mark would handle himself well on the stand. My approach was that we could deal with it, if a problem actually arose, but no such problem ever arose when I was Sheriff.

… My position, which I told District Attorney Harper, was that as long as Mark did his job, I did not have a problem with his editorial writing. I therefore refused to stop Mark from writing letters to the newspaper….As someone who worked in law enforcement for approximately 30 years, what mattered to me was how my deputies performed their job, and not their political opinions. Mark always did his job diligently.

…Mark’s letters, in which he expressed his views on various legal and policy issues,
did not cause me the concern that he would be lenient about enforcing marijuana or other laws.
When it came to his work, he took his duties seriously.

In 2010, Potts ran for Trinity Co. Sheriff and lost to Bruce Haney. According to Sheriff Haney’s statement in sworn court documents, Potts continued to write letters to the Trinity Journal. Including one in 2011 in which he discussed jury nullification (where juries can refuse to convict someone guilty of a crime but not, in their opinion deserving of punishment.)

The DA approached Haney and, according to Sheriff Haney, “advised me that it was improper for Deputy Potts to tell the public that they can disregard the law.” Haney had Potts called in and made aware of what he felt were Potts’ improper actions in writing his opinions in letters to the newspapers.

Potts continued to write letters including ones entitled Prohibition Creates Markets and Incarceration Nation which Potts characterized as questioning the “wisdom of laws against drugs.” An investigation was begun and in February of 2012, Potts was given a written reprimand for violating department policy and warned that further incidents could result in him being fired.

In the summer of 2012 Potts sued, not for money, but for the removal of the reprimand and the right to speak his mind on issues. He wanted to continue to “express his deeply held views about the Constitution.” The ACLU took up his case. A few days ago, Trinity County was ordered to expunge Potts’ reprimand, pay his attorney fees, and desist from interfering in his right to speak his mind.

Potts proclaimed in a September letter to the editor, “Government employees did not check their rights at the door when they signed on. Quite the contrary, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution of which the freedom of speech is a part…Who better to judge the folly of our “War on Drugs” than the cops that fight it on a daily basis? Should these warriors be silenced? I think not. These are the very people with the intimate knowledge necessary to make an informed decision… .”

http://lostcoastoutpost.com/2012/nov/21/deputy-potts-pot-speech-protected/
 
Back
Top