A lesson from Great Britain regarding 'reform' and 'working from the inside'

Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
55
Hello,

I've been following the recent events and even i'm shocked, but I see the debate of whether to stick with the GOP or leave them is dividing Ron Paul supporters so I thought i'd share a similar situation we have over in the United Kingdom with our Conservative Party.

Basically, the party is just like the GOP and has been for years - it completely ignores the voters, ignores the party supporters and is run by a closed group who have control and influence with all of the media networks and newspapers (again, just like the GOP). Now, in recent years since the election of David Cameron as party leader (who rubs Conservative supporters faces in the mud even more so than ever before) there's been a split forming with many deserting the party and joining the newly arisen UKIP (UK Independence Party).

A few years ago, UKIP would only poll 2% or 3% in the national polls yet now it's on 8% and 10% (unprecedented in our political system which is dominated by two large parties) and defections by both voters, activists and leading figures themselves happen weekly now. Indeed, it's now widely accepted that the Conservative Party, which hasn't won an election since 1992, cannot win an election ever again unless it wins back UKIP voters - something I cannot see happening.

So whats our aim over here in Great Britain? we're aiming to destroy the Conservative Party by depriving it of wins so that it folds and UKIP or some other new party can replace it. We tried 'reforming it from the inside' but it was impossible, as (and see the similarity here) the Conservative Party started centralising candidate selection where the leadership would overrule the candidates the party members voted for and replaced them with candidates loyal to the leadership - meaning any hopes of 'reform' are virtually impossible.

I always thought the American system of political parties was much more decentralised so that you actually had a chance of taking over the party, but after seeing the events of the past few months and days, I can't say that so surely anymore. Either way, it's up to you as you'll know best but i'm simply sharing the similar experience we're having here in Great Britain. Here's an article on what i'm talking about; http://conservativehome.blogs.com/p...d-without-a-ukip-deal-warns-danhannanmep.html

Essentially, they won't listen as long as they can win - if you prevent them from winning by taking away votes, they'll have to listen eventually or they'll simply implode as a party. Something to think about.

Thoughts?
 
Hello,

We tried 'reforming it from the inside' but it was impossible, as (and see the similarity here) the Conservative Party started centralising candidate selection where the leadership would overrule the candidates the party members voted for and replaced them with candidates loyal to the leadership - meaning any hopes of 'reform' are virtually impossible.

Thoughts?

The root problem...And I mean the real root problem (here at least) is that we let corporations become "people" on paper. And unfortunately survival and growth are two completely opposing political models. It changed everything. Absolutely everything. So in the spirit of the old of, by and for gag one is left to wonder whom exactly the "leadership" actually are. Who do they direct the help to be representative of, by and for? Mitt Romney say's corporations are people too. Well...he knows why his bread is buttered. So why wouldn't he? Right in front of the drones, he said that. Guess what? Not a peep from them otherwise. It's just..."Uh...OK". And the only way to change that (and fix the rest of the mess permanently) is for the natural citizens of the United States of America to move forward with a brave young attorney or two and properly and precisely define their natural citizenship as such and as an amendment to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution specifically as the founding fathers meant it to be. Bada bing. How hard was that?

But, yes. Thanks for the input from abroad. It is a global phenomenon, is it not?
 
Last edited:
So whats our aim over here in Great Britain? we're aiming to destroy the Conservative Party by depriving it of wins so that it folds and UKIP or some other new party can replace it. We tried 'reforming it from the inside' but it was impossible, as (and see the similarity here) the Conservative Party started centralising candidate selection where the leadership would overrule the candidates the party members voted for and replaced them with candidates loyal to the leadership - meaning any hopes of 'reform' are virtually impossible.

I agree with the this sentiment very much. If RP and his campaign weren't going to win it, why not sink the ship? Why not let RP's last stand be against the GOP that has done nothing? Why not let RP use campaign funds to attack Mitt Romney one-on-one, with hard hitting tv ads...and now, why not be running ads showing supporters being jailed, attacked, lied to/about, and everything else BY Republican leaders?

I don't know. Getting behind Mitt though? Seriously? He will say anything to get elected, and has no consistent record to run on (other than inconsistency).
 
Our aim here was to keep it alive but it fights us every step of the way.

As long as there are those that can fire up the fake money presses to dictate their will we will be under their thumb.

It seems though that they have taken the same route as others with addictive habits.

They have us so beaten down that you can see the effects of their counterfeiting on work traffic. The stock market and commodity prices rise as the value of the dollar drops and less people can make a living working. When the prices fall, more and more join us in the morning commute.

They seem to be blind to anything but their own bottom line.

The rest of the globe seems to be in the same boat now.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

I've been following the recent events and even i'm shocked, but I see the debate of whether to stick with the GOP or leave them is dividing Ron Paul supporters so I thought i'd share a similar situation we have over in the United Kingdom with our Conservative Party.

Basically, the party is just like the GOP and has been for years - it completely ignores the voters, ignores the party supporters and is run by a closed group who have control and influence with all of the media networks and newspapers (again, just like the GOP). Now, in recent years since the election of David Cameron as party leader (who rubs Conservative supporters faces in the mud even more so than ever before) there's been a split forming with many deserting the party and joining the newly arisen UKIP (UK Independence Party).

A few years ago, UKIP would only poll 2% or 3% in the national polls yet now it's on 8% and 10% (unprecedented in our political system which is dominated by two large parties) and defections by both voters, activists and leading figures themselves happen weekly now. Indeed, it's now widely accepted that the Conservative Party, which hasn't won an election since 1992, cannot win an election ever again unless it wins back UKIP voters - something I cannot see happening.

So whats our aim over here in Great Britain? we're aiming to destroy the Conservative Party by depriving it of wins so that it folds and UKIP or some other new party can replace it. We tried 'reforming it from the inside' but it was impossible, as (and see the similarity here) the Conservative Party started centralising candidate selection where the leadership would overrule the candidates the party members voted for and replaced them with candidates loyal to the leadership - meaning any hopes of 'reform' are virtually impossible.

I always thought the American system of political parties was much more decentralised so that you actually had a chance of taking over the party, but after seeing the events of the past few months and days, I can't say that so surely anymore. Either way, it's up to you as you'll know best but i'm simply sharing the similar experience we're having here in Great Britain. Here's an article on what i'm talking about; http://conservativehome.blogs.com/p...d-without-a-ukip-deal-warns-danhannanmep.html

Essentially, they won't listen as long as they can win - if you prevent them from winning by taking away votes, they'll have to listen eventually or they'll simply implode as a party. Something to think about.

Thoughts?

"Thoughts?"

This was the key that unlocked many of today's mystery's for me.

Supersingle500X.jpg


Once you've got the basics from the above some other things should start becoming clear.

~No matter where your aunt Martha hid the cookie jar with here savings in it, others are able to slither in like vampires in the night and suck the strength out of it. This is an understatement. Actually they also suck the strength out of the cookie jar and everything else. EVERYTHING ELSE.

~Sure if the double the money supply your Uncle Phil gets twice as much when he sells his stocks but he is getting twice as many of something worth half as much. Plus some of the very people that counterfeited the money supply have now cut themselves in on his stuff with capital gains taxes. Taxes on Illusionary capital gains!


Can you dig it!
 
Last edited:
After Tampa, let talk about it. If things go as they are right now, I'm considering resigning as PC if the county committee wants me to after I tell them I'm not supporting Romney and why. Maybe I will anyway, if I join a campaign to destroy the elephant.
 
-:Undertaker:-,

So you hung out with the Beatles? Right.

Here is one of me hanging out with Ringo.

DSC05136sw.jpg


That's him and the All Starr Band here at the Mountain Winery in 2012.
 
when you restore your right to bear arms, let me know how you did it. then i might listen to you.

:D I was about to say that I'd love to elect some UKIP members in the U.S., except the party needs some help on the right to bear arms. UKIP is still the best thing going in the UK, though. ...Now I think I'll go watch the video again of Godfrey Bloom standing in Parliament and calling Al Gore a crook.... :)
 
UKIP is closer to fascist than anything libertarian. Sure they put a nicer face on it and are less crude than the British National Party but when it comes down to it they act like a bunch of country club racists. No offense to the original poster as the options in Britain are very thin on the ground.
 
UKIP is closer to fascist than anything libertarian. Sure they put a nicer face on it and are less crude than the British National Party but when it comes down to it they act like a bunch of country club racists. No offense to the original poster as the options in Britain are very thin on the ground.

Complete nonsense and just what the main parties do to dismiss us, call us racists/loonies and fruitcakes. It is true that the leadership in UKIP are surrounded by older conservatives and are less 'libertarian' than the younger generations, but the party isn't racist or fascist in the slightest otherwise I wouldn't have joined. Just like they do in the US (calling people racists/fascists) with Ron.

Thank you to everybody else for the comments by the way!
 
Last edited:
They are the kind of 'libertarian free marketeers' that Republicans like Paul Ryan are. While i have met some that want to remove themselves out of europe for the right reason the majority i have come across are xenophobic littler englanders who hate johnny foreigner. They advocate govt job creation and investment, a 25 yr plan on building new nuclear power stations (which is fine if its not tax payer funded). Massive investment in prisons, strict border control, strict law and order policy, Increase spending on military by 40%, Increase spending on the National Health Service, Increase spending on public education, they believe public transportation is a public right and will increase spending by 3 billion a year, Platform 15 of their policies 'Restoring Britishness' ;) Ban people from wearing certain clothes that they dont like. Schools must teach things that are congruent with British values as defined by the state. All can be found here in their manifesto. http://www.ukip.org/media/pdf/UKIPmanifesto1304a.pdf

They sound pretty fascist to me mate. Of course not in the british mindset of fascism being folk jackbooting down the street with outstretched arms and charlie chaplin mustache. Fascist in the same economic way that Romney and Obama are.



Complete nonsense and just what the main parties do to dismiss us, call us racists/loonies and fruitcakes. It is true that the leadership in UKIP are surrounded by older conservatives and are less 'libertarian' than the younger generations, but the party isn't racist or fascist in the slightest otherwise I wouldn't have joined. Just like they do in the US (calling people racists/fascists) with Ron.

Thank you to everybody else for the comments by the way!
 
I don't know what's "racist" about things like border security and promoting British culture. The UK has a lot of problems from open borders and extreme multiculturalism. It's pretty crazy reading news stories about how people can seemingly never do anything wrong there as long as they can say their culture says it's ok. Sure, someone could take it to an extreme the other way, but I've always just looked at the UKIP's intent as basically "if you want to live in Britain, then be British." Sort of like in America: "are you a hyphenated American, or are you an American?"

Though I do have trouble with any country or political party that thinks royalty is a good idea. I mean, wtf is that. Are the princes and knights going to roll some 20-sided dice and go fight some dragons or something?
 
I think, in our case with the GOP, this kind of scenario is still too premature...our numbers and influence isn't strong enough (yet), and it would probably take having some very well known congressmen and senators to actually defect along with us and bring with them enough of the voter base. I'm afraid that all that defecting would accomplish right now would be fewer Americans hearing the message, and would mean abandoning the seats we have already won so far. It might be true in the end that it may not be possible to reform the party, but at least, there is going to need to be a wing of the party first with enough influence before the GOP would even consider it a threat. Right now, they are hoping we will just defect, since our numbers are still small enough and we could fade to obscurity. So I think, better to stay put, until further notice.
 
Last edited:
Interesting post.... not right post. I dont agree with it... Ron Paul movement is taking back GOP one state at the time (Nevada, Iowa, Alaska, Maine etc.) ?/50... That is good progress. Problem is when people disperse energy. When fraction splitter into Libertarian party (25,000 members only?) or wants to start new party (0 members) or wants to give up or or or. Ron Paul made a plan and plan is working just fine (even if there are defeats and setbacks). Biggest threat to this movement are splitters/great real life example that I used few times/(it will end with: He is over there.). So many positions are taken by liberty people. Imagine if they all just quit and followed splitters and started from scratch.... and then after few years new fraction emerges and everyone quits that course and starts from scratch again....Imagine if Gandhi quit his salt march and started another and then quit that one too to start yet another one from starch. Imagine river of beer....nvm.
 
Interesting post.... not right post. I dont agree with it... Ron Paul movement is taking back GOP one state at the time (Nevada, Iowa, Alaska, Maine etc.) ?/50... That is good progress. Problem is when people disperse energy. When fraction splitter into Libertarian party (25,000 members only?) or wants to start new party (0 members) or wants to give up or or or. Ron Paul made a plan and plan is working just fine (even if there are defeats and setbacks). Biggest threat to this movement are splitters/great real life example that I used few times/(it will end with: He is over there.). So many positions are taken by liberty people. Imagine if they all just quit and followed splitters and started from scratch.... and then after few years new fraction emerges and everyone quits that course and starts from scratch again....Imagine if Gandhi quit his salt march and started another and then quit that one too to start yet another one from starch. Imagine river of beer....nvm.

Agreed, well said.
 
You really can't compare UK politics to US politics though, completely different systems.
 
And also, UKIP are a statist party, comprised of BNP in Blazers, old school Thatcherites and Hannan type conservatives. They are only marginally better than the Conservative Party.

Furthermore, UKIP did have a little success recently, but they generally fluctuate at around 6% so you saying 8-10% is an exaggeration.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top