7 states have no c4L sponsors

[free.alive]

States with no C4L cosponsors:

Connecticut
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Dakota
Rhode Island
Vermont

 

[Kotin]

NH huh??

weird..

 

[ClayTrainor]

How is it possible that NH has none?

 

[Austin]

Copsponsors? Do you mean state coordinators, or am I missing something here...

 

[eduardo89]

I think he means no hr1207 cosponsors

 

[LittleLightShining]

NE ftl

 

[ItsTime]

You will not get any cosigners from New Hampshire. New Hampshire is becoming as liberal as Mass. The free state project is great and all, they just picked the wrong state. Too many dems are moving from Boston to Manchester area and taking over the state.

 

[ChaosControl]

The north east is really a lost cause, it should probably just be a separate country. They love their corporatism. But then it really is the breeding ground of the elitist anti-liberty nutjobs.

Amazing to think it was once involved in the American Revolution, I can guarantee you that nowadays they'd all be crown loyalists.

Free state project should never have picked a North Eastern state.

 

[Jeremy]

CT, Mass, and RI kinda make sense. But not the others.

 

[Jeremy]

The north east is really a lost cause, it should probably just be a separate country. They love their corporatism. But then it really is the breeding ground of the elitist anti-liberty nutjobs.

Amazing to think it was once involved in the American Revolution, I can guarantee you that nowadays they'd all be crown loyalists.

Free state project should never have picked a North Eastern state.

The three farthest north aren't

 

[RonPaulFanInGA]

Free state project should never have picked a North Eastern state.

New Hampshire was a really dumb choice from the start. They have a good-sized population and a bunch of nuts from neighboring Massachusetts moving in at a much faster rate than the Free State Project can ever hope to counter.

Make it Montana.

 

[puppetmaster]

Well maybe the follower type of content people stayed in that area. People who love liberty were probably not content with just hanging around in the northeast. They moved on go other wild parts of the New America spread liberty.
Well just a theory.

The north east is really a lost cause, it should probably just be a separate country. They love their corporatism. But then it really is the breeding ground of the elitist anti-liberty nutjobs.


Amazing to think it was once involved in the American Revolution, I can guarantee you that nowadays they'd all be crown loyalists.

Free state project should never have picked a North Eastern state.

 

[torchbearer]

New Hampshire was a really dumb choice from the start. They have a good-sized population and a bunch of nuts from neighboring Massachusetts moving in at a much faster rate than the Free State Project can ever hope to counter.

Make it Montana.

This.
Montana was one of the original free state considerations.
I signed up to move prior to a state being picked. I thought the obvious choice was Montana.
Find a sparsely populated county and move in- set up shops just like in the old west towns.
Paulville, Montana.

 

[gls]

New Hampshire was a really dumb choice from the start. They have a good-sized population and a bunch of nuts from neighboring Massachusetts moving in at a much faster rate than the Free State Project can ever hope to counter.

Make it Montana.

So I assume you're starting the Montana Free State Project?

Oh, I see, you're just complaining.

 

[Jeremy]

New Hampshire was a really dumb choice from the start. They have a good-sized population and a bunch of nuts from neighboring Massachusetts moving in at a much faster rate than the Free State Project can ever hope to counter.

Make it Montana.

actually you dont really know what youre talking about lol

go watch the ridley report

 

[Jeremy]

This.
Montana was one of the original free state considerations.
I signed up to move prior to a state being picked. I thought the obvious choice was Montana.
Find a sparsely populated county and move in- set up shops just like in the old west towns.
Paulville, Montana.

People from Montana have moved to NH with the FSP and have said NH is better because Montana was too big to organize anything. Honestly... no one wants to travel several hours a day for something small.

 

[torchbearer]

People from Montana have moved to NH with the FSP and have said NH is better because Montana was too big to organize anything. Honestly... no one wants to travel several hours a day for something small.

That is why you open a general store that carries everything your community uses. Then one person ships in all the goods needed, and every makes a short trip to pick up their goods.
You want to get away from the invisible hand. Move west- not New England.
In a village, you will need one general store/fuel station.Maybe someone who can do ammunition creation and rifle repair.
An agricultural co-op to help people farm their own food- this task can be done by one family- sold from a store front next to the general store.
(basically this is the core- blacksmith/merchant/farmer)
Then you may want to have others who do animal husbandry.

With the right mix of families, you can start a core of a village that has everything you need.

 

[Rangeley]

The north east is really a lost cause, it should probably just be a separate country. They love their corporatism. But then it really is the breeding ground of the elitist anti-liberty nutjobs.

Amazing to think it was once involved in the American Revolution, I can guarantee you that nowadays they'd all be crown loyalists.

Free state project should never have picked a North Eastern state.

Maine has one representative (out of two) signed onto HR 1207, so New England isn't totally unrepresented. And the congressman is for northern Maine, where Ron Paul actually won in the caucus. Not to mention he got a respectable 18% in the state overall.

 

[ItsTime]

actually you dont really know what youre talking about lol

go watch the ridley report

He knows very well what he is talking about. I am not saying the Freestaters are not doing anything good (they are). But New Hampshire is getting flooded by people from Mass at a WAY higher rate than coming for the free state.

Ive been on the Ridley Report

 

[gls]

He knows very well what he is talking about. I am not saying the Freestaters are not doing anything good (they are). But New Hampshire is getting flooded by people from Mass at a WAY higher rate than coming for the free state.

Ive been on the Ridley Report

What evidence do you have that the people coming from Mass are liberals? It makes more sense to me that they would be conservatives. That's why they're leaving Massachusetts. The democratic victories in the last 2 election cycles were part of a nationwide backlash against neocon Republican leadership. That will pass and the many reasons why New Hampshire is the best place for such an effort will remain.