3 "Superbanks" now in violation of federal antitrust laws

Created4

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2007
Messages
3,470
From http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27441147/

Several of the nation's biggest banks have failed or been absorbed by healthier institutions, leaving three giant "superbanks" with an unprecedented concentration of market power: Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.

existing federal banking laws say that no bank can have more than 10 percent of the domestic deposit market — a threshold recently surpassed by all three superbanks.

When asked whether the government would take any action, a Justice Department official was noncommittal.

“It’s always something we’ve looked at and will continue to look at," said spokeswoman Gina Talamona. "It’s something we’ve looked at as part of our general antitrust review.”

The reason limits on market share were put in place were so banks didn’t get so big they’d become monopolies that could risk the whole economy, explains Atul Gupta, finance department chair for Bentley University in Boston.
 
What anti-trust laws... I didn't see any anti-trust laws, did you?

OH, you meant those outdated, obsolete things
that we ignore whenever we feel like it (oops I meant "in times of emergency")... just like we do all of the rest of the laws we don't want to follow.

I'm sure someone can just write up an "executive order" or a justice department memo or something that ... well can just make this all go away. OR, if someone decides to sue, we can just make sure the judge rules them as having "no standing" and dismiss the case.

Same thing either way.

Laws are only intended to be used to persecute the rabble... and when needed, to get rid of political opponents... not to actually be followed!

[/sarcasm]
 
I have to respond with, duh!

I keep on bringing this up anytime people say we have/need antitrust laws to keep monoplies from forming and preserve the "free market." No, just the opposite.
 
Back
Top