13 years later man with shoebox full of cash still fighting govt to get it back

Mani

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
3,576
So a guy saved up, didn't spend lavishly, and tried to become an entrepreneur following the american dream to start a business but had it all vanish once the gov't started sniffing around.

http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/13-years-later-mans-war-with-u-s-over-shoebox-cash-rages-on/

Nicholas Marrocco says he kept hundreds of thousands of dollars in a shoebox, in his clothing and even in a bowl in his home in west suburban Wood Dale.

He says he’d messed up his credit in college and couldn’t get a bank account, so he squirreled away the money he’d earned at a pizza joint.

But Marrocco says he lost his life savings on Dec. 6, 2002, when federal drug agents at Union Station in Chicago seized more than $101,000 from a friend he entrusted with the money in their hunt for a restaurant venture on the West Coast.

Federal authorities say they suspected Marrocco and the friend were in the narcotics business.

More than 13 years later, Marrocco — who insists he and his pal weren’t drug dealers — is still fighting to get his money back. He points out they weren’t charged with a crime, and no drugs were ever recovered.

Marrocco’s attorney, Stephen Komie, and a federal source both say they believe Marrocco’s case is the longest-running asset forfeiture battle in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

Continued...
 
In testimony before Congress, the Justice Department has defended such cases, saying they “enable the government to recover property when criminal prosecution of the possessor of the property may not be appropriate or feasible.”

Well, there you have it Mundanes.

Guilty. Just a matter of time before we pick you up.

Move the fuck along now.
 
It's the money that's the suspect, not the person.


This is what they actually say.
 
Or should this thread title more accurately be?: 13 years later man withOUT shoe box full of cash still fighting govt to get it back
 
Last edited:
In the article it said that it is the longest running case. I am betting it is because most people give up and .gov keeps the money. Can you imagine the cost to retain a lawyer for 13 years?
 
In the article it said that it is the longest running case. I am betting it is because most people give up and .gov keeps the money. Can you imagine the cost to retain a lawyer for 13 years?

That's exactly what I was thinking. He probably has other shoe boxes and there are likely a lot of lawyers who would work a lot harder for a shoe box full of cash.
 
Back
Top