Recent content by wrestlingwes_8

This is like asking, show me the specific evidence that the sky is blue. Sorry, I don't have time to entertain your ignorance. I don't care if you think I'm full of shit, science is on my side here Well the wheels of nature have been turning for billions of years now so, yeah, I'd say that's...

The sky isn't purple because you say so, sorry.

An animal or plant that is exotic to an area is considered a disturbance to that specific ecosystem. The local flora and fauna are not accustomed to whatever attributes a new species has, and they usually respond in a negative way. Why do you people insist on arguing for the sake of arguing...

Through this perceived chaos emerges stability. So you are wrong, nature is indeed very in balance. How do you think forests manage to maintain themselves for hundreds of years???

YES. ANY PHYSICS TEXTBOOK WILL TELL YOU THIS Because if I'm talking to someone about biology I shouldn't have to explain THE VERY BASICS. If nature wasn't inherently sustainable, there wouldn't be any nature! All the seeds of different plants would germinate, grow, then die and nothing...

Yes it has a basis, go ask any high school biology teacher. They will tell you that the systems of nature are sustainable (excluding some outside disturbance). That is the main problem of modern physics. Open ANY physic textbook and in the diagrams and examples they will tell you that those...

Humanity is currently refusing to live in the bounds of nature. That doesn't mean we are immune to the consequences or effects of nature.

Haha, you can't be serious. If you don't know anything about the systems of nature why are you even participating in this conversation? This is BASIC biology, jeesh!

I'd be very interested to see the study that confirms this It only appears as "disharmony" to you because you don't understand the system. Only where volcanic activity happens on a very regular basis does it bring most of the systems of nature to a halt(i.e.-trees, nutrient cycling, water...

You just repackaged your argument here. You jump to an improbable situation and then use it to justify and prove your thinking. AGAIN,

It only proves the system exists! It doesn't prove the system is part of nature. Seriously, this isn't that hard to understand. EVERYTHING in nature has one thing in common. The systems and inputs are sustainable. If you think modern civilization is sustainable then, I'm sorry but you're...

Then show me one other example in nature. Nature has a pattern, and follows it to a T everywhere in the world.

A) The way man lives in modern societies is NOT how nature functions. These are inventions of man. Yes, man is a part of nature but is man living in harmony and balance, like all of nature? No. B) Yes C) Again false. Nature does NOT operate solely by the "survival of the fittest" model...

Does anyone take this clown seriously? I mean, WOW! Talk about cognitive dissidence.

Completely false. Unless an outside disturbance is introduced (i.e.-modern human civilization), one species will NOT hunt another to extinction. That is not how nature works, sorry.