Recent content by tonypeck

A common talking point people use is, does the second amendment allow for arms such as rocket launchers? Thoughts?

Well yeah self defense shouldn't be a crime in any scenario

Well can't they still have their rights while on probation?

But when one commits a crime aren't they essentially giving up some of their rights after they are convicted and tried? Being in prison isn't really being free right?

Excellent explanation, very just reasoning

That's for sure. So should criminals with a violent history be denied purchasing further guns or should nobody be denied under any circumstances? (i'm just posing questions that have been posed to me before)

Yeah anti depressants certainly are the common denominator, so should they be added to the Gun Control Act of 1968 or would that be considered infringing on one's rights?

I totally agree with all of you, but the argument Savage uses is the Gun Control Act of 1968 which denies guns to such people as felons and drug addicts

What do you say to those like Michael Savage who are saying people on anti depressants should not be able to buy guns?

This may not answer all of your questions, but I found it to be a pretty good analysis of the often confusing language used in this bill (and bills in general): http://www.infowars.com/myth-busted-yes-the-ndaa-does-apply-to-americans-and-heres-the-text-that-says-so/

In response to the nonsense that Santorum says about Dr. Paul's view on abortion, it may seem logical on the outside, but when you look at Ron Paul's reasoning for his position, Paul makes total sense again and Santorum is wrong. Santorum wants to make anti-abortion a federal law. As mentioned...