Recent content by TheKnowBuddies

When I dont write down the chords & lyrics the inspiration gets away to the next one. The INTENT of the RULES as described in the preamble spells out THE SAID INTENT, if intentions mean anything in a court. The second paragraph: "It is the intent and purpose of these rules to encourage and...

You guys have been busy. I have had wall to wall distractions-Got some reading to do - I have some thoughts, got sort out the order. I do believe the _______ at the beginning of the ?RULES? should be quantified BE IT RESOLVED, That the Republican Party is the party of the open door. Ours is the...

ClydeCoulter, I intend to read Lopez Torres, do you have a link? Also I am looking for other puzzle pieces in ref to Dismissal page 13 line 16: The Court concludes that no authority supports Plaintiffs’ interpretation of Section 1971(b), but that that there are several indisputably...

In the Dismissal 8-7-2012, under the heading: II. Legal Standard Found on page -5- Starting on line 10 we find the following: Under the incorporation by reference doctrine, the court may also consider documents “whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party...

Yes From twitter: Dean AKA born4this ‏@deanrobot @USA_Free_Press HAHA! I tell people that the lawsuit is going well & they look at me liking I'm a drunk talking about who knows what... :P Response USA_Patriot_Press USA_Patriot_Press ‏@USA_Free_Press @deanrobot That is because they do not have...

Since I am likely to be considered a newbie, so as not to be a lol lol object, I'll keep my 2 cent out, don't wanna create bad feelings - maybe a Separate thread that only has to do with the 9th circuit action to unbind Delegates and put the RNC Chair, Reinse & Company Defendants under the Law...

Well, remember, there is that tag team connection, if you read the threads on DP. None the less, No One knows more about the 9th circuit action than RG and the Judge. We may gain a lot more confidence once we get the transcript. RG says that the Judge is watching the evidence/DVD's. Although...

I am working on establishing a respectful line of communication with Gilbert. He may know more about me than I am aware of. I made no excuses for any of human shortcomings, rather opposed undue personal attacks. He has very little respect for DP. Source example from DP: Submitted by Patriot...

It's not about how long you've been in town, IMHO, It's about your choices of who and what to believe and trust. 1776 against all odds, Keep the Faith, make the best of what you can and stay focused on your goals. Changing the world is hard work. :)

So many thought that RG would NOT get this far. The JUDGE got the admission that they BREAK their own rules. No wonder detractors are working overtime. RG is filing in the Federal Appellate Court early next week as a backup to expedite. Transcript is planned to be posted on Monday. Full Steam Ahead.

How about Steve Dickson ...and the case AGAINST L4RP http://www.dailypaul.com/243838/steps-you-can-takeand-the-case-against-l4rp ?? ( I did not get into name calling, Notice S___ addressed very little toward me, He knows who I am from DP. )

Good Morning / oops, Afternoon - I have had a few things get between me and my 'puter. I'll have to get caught up on some reading. In the meantime I'll throw this out there, written by someone I respect and is highly devoted to the Liberty Movement & Dr. Paul...

RG said tonight on the Radio Interview that he plans to have it posted on Monday. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ronpaulgirl/2012/08/10/live-interview-with-attorney-richard-gilbert

As I recall the first amendment was for the purposes of adding more Plaintiffs and no other content had changed - Ref per minute order 7-12-2012 (from memory)

ClydeCoulter, RG said that he will be posting the transcript on Monday. This should bring some clarity and less skeptical speculations. (hopefully)