http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf
"WHAT WE SHOULD DO NOW
A North American Advisory Council. To ensure a regular
injection of creative energy into the various efforts related to North
American integration, the three governments should appoint an...
The courts would be privately owned and voluntary like everything else on the market. They would depend on people buying their service and if their service wasn't good, or was unjust ,they would go out of business because no one would buy their service.
Law would be determined by the non-aggression axiom - "The libertarian creed rests upon one central axiom: that no man or group of men may aggress against the person or property of anyone else. This may be called the "nonaggression axiom."
The police and courts would enforce the law. If someone...
I stopped watching it as soon as they referred to anarchy as being lawless. I never advocated getting rid of laws. Their definition of anarchy is much different than mine. I also didn't like the fact that they kept referring to the 10 commandments.
Why is anarchy utopistic? So we don't argue over semantics I'm going to go ahead and give you my definition of anarchy. "I define anarchist society as one where there is no legal possibility for coercive aggression against the person or property of an individual." - Murray Rothbard from...
"Real free trade requires no treaties." - Lew Rockwell
If you want to have true free trade and no borders than we need to get rid of government, not make a bigger one. Even if the leaders were elected by the majority it would still be corrupt because every government uses aggression to stay in...
Some roads could be owned by businesses or neighborhoods. Businesses would be sure to keep the roads nice or less people would by their products/services.
Taxation is theft, war is mass murder, and conscription is slavery. Just because the majority condones something doesn't make it right...