Recent content by Sentient Void

I tried to copypasta the whole piece, here, but all of the formatting, lists, images, citations, links, etc get lost and it becomes very difficult to read. So here's a snippet from it, and you can read the whole thing, here...

Hah. I remember that for sure. I was right there in the Lynnfield high school, saw it all happen. The look on the GOP establishment delegates' faces... it was classic. Initially, they were 'all so excited to see so many young people' -- used to only 20-50 faces, and they had over 250 people or...

Why hello, everyone! It's great to see how active this place still is, after all these years, and to see so many familiar names still active on here and pushing that boulder uphill (heh!). It's also very sad to see some of the names that I very distinctly remember from my days here, up on the...

I haven't been on RPF in the forums or blogging for quite a while, now. As it stands, I've moved my primary blogging space to its own site, at a place I call 'A Sisyphean Revolt', where I talk about politics, economics, philosophy, culture, and entertainment. My internet 'nym can be found under...

Oh, man... I just signed in to see what was up... haven't been here in... years? And this is the first thing I clicked on. I distinctly remember discussing stuff with at least five of these people and it really hit me seeing these names. Good folks. It's good that you guys put this up and have...

Ah, yes. The ole AGW 'debate' (if one could honestly call it that). I apologize in advance for sullying your computer screen with another such screed, but the AGW hype-train just keeps on keepin' on, and there are some particularly glaring nosebleed-inducing dents in said hype-train for me to...

The equivocation and dervish-dancing and general discomfort amongst some libertarians is strong, here. heheheh. I rest my case. Did you 'break' the NAP? Did you *aggress* against person and/or property? Yes? Then you violated the NAP. Just say it. 'Sometimes, in extraordinarily rare...

This misses the point. While I might argue that he would be 'right' based on his own morals and values, specifically the survival and protection of his family above all else, that is not what I set out to do. What I set out to do is simply show that the strong tendency for far too many...

I think this is one of a few very *particularly* important subjects for self-proclaimed 'libertarians' to really think seriously about. I haven't posted a new article in some months (my last one was on abortion, I don't recall if I shared that with anyone on the forums or not, but it got ~3000...

I think this is one of a few very *particularly* important subjects for self-proclaimed 'libertarians' to really think seriously about. I haven't posted a new article in some months (my last one was on abortion, I don't recall if I shared that with anyone on the forums or not, but it got ~3000...

I think this is one of a few very *particularly* important subjects for self-proclaimed 'libertarians' to really think seriously about. I haven't posted a new article in some months (my last one was on abortion, I don't recall if I shared that with anyone on the forums or not, but it got ~3000...

I think this is one of a few very *particularly* important subjects for self-proclaimed 'libertarians' to really think seriously about. I haven't posted a new article in some months (my last one was on abortion, I don't recall if I shared that with anyone on the forums or not, but it got ~3000...

First, what is 'the NAP' (for those unlikely few of you)? Now, the NAP is the very beating heart of what libertarianism is and stands for, as a philosophy. It's not merely just for concepts of 'government' but really for general interaction with your fellow man. The whole idea is that the same...

hahaha, I can only imagine. I *do* remember a thread with a poll that I actually started some years ago, that carried on for quite a while, that showed that for at least those who voted in the poll, the anarcho-capitalist segment of RPF was actually very strongly represented and compromised...

Murray Rothbard contradicts himself here, based on his own theory of 'proportionality'. But I addressed this all in the article. Did you actually read it, or just knee-jerk react to the subject heading?