Recent content by Respect38

I kind of doubt that a poll would allow you to make both choices. I am making an assumption here, but the percents do add up to 100% (now, after the OP has edited the post--I assume it was in error?)

The Commission on Presidential Debates, for one.

I assume that these people didn't have a candidate listed that they're voting for?

Too early to call, we don't know if Gary Johnson will be in the debates yet. If he does make the debates, then his numbers will spike. If not, then there's not much set-in-stone Gary Johnson votes from what I can see. Although, I'll say it's probably more than Barr had.

Bump, this is currently going on.

Gary Johnson has stated that he will be planning to do an AMA("Ask me anything"). (link to announcement thread in his subreddit, r/GaryJohnson. He doesn't appear to be answering any questions in there) If you have any questions or criticisms for Gary Johnson, then you will get a chance to ask...

Except, because most states wouldn't count a Ron Paul vote, that number is going to have to literally be a blind guess. See the official 2008 results, and less than 10 states keep a count for Ron Paul. The majority of states didn't, and won't this year. If we are successful in pushing Gary...

I don't understand where you're getting at, but m'kay. If I understand it correctly, this would be a "Hey, you guys in this state can write-in Ron Paul!" or "Hey, you guys cannot write-in Ron Paul, support Gary Johnson or Virgil Goode instead!". If so, sounds good to me. Just don't be...

I cannot possibly support this, as 1) Ron Paul cannot qualify for enough states to have a mathematical chance of winning, and 2) it would be a silly split of the liberty vote between Gary Johnson/Virgil Goode and Ron Paul.

Wow... common sense, why wouldn't you spread the follows over a period of time? That just LOOKS suspicious. Maybe if it was after the convention... but, seriously? Why would you do it now and make it look obvious? :confused:

I have been thinking about this as well. It seems extremely unlikely, but to be honest, I don't know the process to choose VPs, plus, I wonder what Gary Johnson would do? Plus, I'm not sure if the Republicans would like an (L) VP. What exactly states are we talking about? Just the...

If there are two inconsistent statements, then the newest one takes priority. Therefore, it's up to you to prove that he still holds those ideas. Please link to the statement you're referring to in the second sentence, please. Sources...

Yeah, both are great, though. He's already done the latter, so why is that a reason not to continue to try the former?

The heck? Sometimes I copy-paste with CTRL-C and it just doesn't work... sorry. Here is the video I was referring to. Fixed that in the original post.

Oh, and speaking of those debates, checkmate. A more recent statement: check. A more libertarian point: check.