Recent content by judejin

. your answer to the first question is perfectly accepted. as to the second question, you agree that "we can't have a split law where one group of people can charge murder for an assault on the fetus while the other can't." so what can we do to resolve the split? i guess local laws can have...

should a pregnant woman on the death row be spared death or should the execution be delayed until the woman delivers the baby? if your answer is yes, why do you think in this case the fetus should matter in determining the fate of the woman? full disclosure: my answer is yes. i'm against...

RIGHTS are everything you can do to yourself and your properties without hurting others IN ORDER TO LIVE. SUICIDE is TO DIE. so SUICIDE is by definition NOT a RIGHT. it is SELF-DESTRUCTION, SELF-TERMINATION. A RIGHT that TERMINATES ALL RIGHTS is contradictory logically. SUICIDE is...

of source the fed, the money printer.

if IRS is abolished, 99% of the government agencies will automatically shut down or disband for lack of money to operate. so we only need to abolish IRS!

when one dies from natural causes, all of his properties rights will be transfered to other people, even his pets. when one dies, the entity of himself doesn't exist any more. so right of speech, etc all vanishes when one dies. his body will be burned or buried. what rights are left of him? nil...

you totally don't get my logic. i'm NOT saying that this person needs to get permission to seek suicide. SUICIDE is NOT a RIGHT. You don't need a permission from me to do it. But when i discover you hanging there, i'll cut you loose and save you! simple as that! "Rights ONLY exist in regards...

suicide is not a crime! suicide is not a right! suicide is pure self-destruction!

SUICIDE is SELF-DESTRUCTION, NOT a RIGHT!

any activities associated with living without hurting others are rights! but suicide is to DIE! so suicide is NOT a right! with me?

suicide is a required action for someone to LIVE? are you kidding yourself?

suicide is not a RIGHT. but suicide is neither wrong nor illegal. we cannot punish anyone who failed a suicide since he only tried to kill himself. suicide is not even morally wrong. all i'm saying is that suicide is not a RIGHT because rights is everything required to LIVE while suicide is...

yes, of course you can. but when you do so, you're not exercising a RIGHT. you're performing self-destruction. RIGHTS, by definition, only pertains to everything that's required to LIVE. suicide is to DIE, thus it is not a right. that's why anyone trying to save you is NOT violating your RIGHTS.

let's imagine exactly such a scenario. someone was stopped in his suicide attempt half way thru and he became paralyzed for life. can this person charge the person saving him for damage? this is an interesting scenario. but in my logic, the person saving him is innocent. because this is...

but that's not the argument here. we're arguing whether suicide is a RIGHT.