Recent content by johnwk

  1. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    And? You posted that to say what? I have stated facts in Post No. 18 Instead of responding to what I post to you, you wander into irrelevant subject matter having nothing to do with what I have posted to you. :rolleyes:
  2. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    I certainly am serious in wanting to preserve and protect the terms and conditions under which our federal Constitution was agreed to by the States and people therein. The reference to "person" found in the Fourteenth Amendment makes no mention of "gay" or "sex". And, nowhere in our Federal...
  3. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    We are discussing the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to forbidding the states to make distinctions based upon sex. Did I post any inaccurate information in the time line I presented?
  4. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    You are wandering. We are discussing the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to forbidding the states to make distinctions based upon sex. Let us look at the associated historical time line for the truth and facts. On July 9th, 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment is adopted, the first...
  5. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    I am not ignoring anything. Our Constitutional system requires the text of our constitution to be followed and its documented "legislative intent" which gives context to its text. Those who reject abiding by the text of our Constitution, and the intentions and beliefs under which it was agree...
  6. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    Loving v Virginia involved discrimination based upon race which was intended to be prohibited by the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. The legislative intent of the Fourteenth Amendment was summarized as follows by Representative Shellabarger: “Its whole effect is not to confer or regulate...
  7. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    Why the majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges needs to be revisited and overturned. Obergefell v. Hodges reversed the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which appropriately upheld, on November 6, 2014 Kentucky’s ban on same-sex marriage. Some of the glaring problems with the majority...
  8. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    Actually, you were spot on and the time line from the Fourteenth Amendment forward proves you are correct! Let us look at the associated historical time line for the truth and facts. On July 9th, 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment is adopted, the first Section reading as follows: All persons born...
  9. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    I appreciate your opinion concerning the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, but it is not supported by the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, nor the documented legislative intent for which the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. The text of the Fourteenth Amendment states: "No State...
  10. J

    Obergefell v. Hodges is a classic case of judicial tyranny, its date will live in infamy

    For those who are dedicated supporters and defenders of the miracle our forefathers created (the Constitution of the United States of America), the MAJORITY’S OPINION in Obergefell v. Hodges, handed down June 26, 2015, like a number of previous “precedent” setting opinions, will long be remember...
  11. J

    Trump Slams 'Crazy' Rand Paul Over Opposition To Monster Debt Increase In 'BBB'

    Well, on that we agree and why Congress must be stopped from adding to the national debt year after year, after year.
  12. J

    Trump Slams 'Crazy' Rand Paul Over Opposition To Monster Debt Increase In 'BBB'

    By "realist" do you mean that Congress has no intention to end adding to the national debt, even thought that debt now exceeds $136 trillion when including unfunded debt liabilities?
  13. J

    Gov. DeSantis should reveal the text of the Balanced Budget Amendment he supports.

    No. He should not throw it into the trash. But Gov. DeSantis should reveal the text, of the Balanced Budget Amendment he supports.
  14. J

    Gov. DeSantis should reveal the text of the Balanced Budget Amendment he supports.

    I heard Ran Paul on Newsmax this evening complaining about the deficit, and yet he ignores our Founder's intended remedy, the Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment, by which to deal with deficits.. Why?
  15. J

    Gov. DeSantis should reveal the text of the Balanced Budget Amendment he supports.

    See: Control an Otherwise Uncontrollable Congress With States-Backed Amendments June 9th, 2025 "When Congress fails to deliver the goods on its own, it’s going to take the people to do it — Congress’ boss. And Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis has been promoting the exact means to do it. As a...
Back
Top