Recent content by jmdrake

You're not serious. If you were you wouldn't keep re-posting the text of the 14th amendment to "prove" that it doesn't mention sex when nobody argued that it did. If you were serious you would address the fact that historically nobody argued the 14th amendment applied to anti miscegenation...

No I'm not. You're not even making a serious attempt at refuting what I'm saying. You're just regurgitating the same false arguments over and over again. Let me know when you decide to be serious.

The fundamental flaw in your bot programming is the misguided belief that "Trump doesn't want the democrats to control the government." Trump campaigned for Hillary Clinton in 2008. As president, Trump undermined the candidacy of Mia Love and was gleeful when she lost her seat to a Democrat...

Yes you are. You have not even addressed the fact that for over 100 years after the passage of the 14th amendment, Justice Thomas' marriage was illegal in many states. You can keep saying over and over agin "I'm not ignoring X" when you clearly are. Originally, for 100 years, equal...

Fair enough. Jehovah wasn't okay with it. Here is my main contention. The idea that somehow the murder of infants is justified because of the sins of the Canaanites, including child sacrifice, is repugnant. And I get it. Some argue that that Israelites didn't REALLY kill the children, the...

You're ignoring the fact that: 1) The fourteenth amendment does not mention race 2) For a solid 100 years after the passage of the 14th amendment, many states still criminalized interracial marriage. Clearly those who passed the 14th amendment had zero intention of allowing interracial...

I'm as much of a conspiracy theorist as anyone, but in this case the official story makes far more sense than the insanity that was being spun by the right. One victim among 11 shot turned out to be a photgenic white female Republican and that turned into "She was another Charlie Kirk"...

Pretty much every argument made against Obergefell can also be made against Loving v Virginia. And pretty much every argument made for Obergefell can also be made for Loving v Virginia. Arguments against Loving: The 14th amendment doesn't mention race. Race was mentioned in the 15th...

That's at 11:00. At 22:00 in she drops the f-bomb on Ben Shapiro and the "midget horse" he rode in on.

LOL! You're wrong for that!

Okay. Well maybe I don't understand your question and/or you don't undertand my position. This is my position. The scientific belief, that humans interbred with another species, fits an interepretation of the Genesis narrative that I think is at least plausible and possibly the most straight...