Recent content by jbuttell

and yet he couldn't endorse Ron Paul during the primaries.

Crazy eh?

I keep visiting overstock hoping to replace amazon, but I just find the organization of the site disappointing. It just feels like a site full of a few leftover products, not the robust "we have everything" store like amazon. That said, now with amazon collecting tax in CA, I'm probably going to...

well done ;)

Does make me wonder though - why the opposition doesn't come here more often for some healthy debate. Sure, people can get a bit rough here, but far less so than most other forums. People just don't have any guts I guess to come here.

No, during the primary - a vote for anyone but Ron Paul, was a vote for Obama.

I'd make one that says "Liberty In Excelsis!"

Unfortunately, while the average republican might be persuaded, confused about Rand... the establishment knows who he is and is mostly biting their tongue right now. I find it difficult to believe he'll be able to politically maneuver around them long enough to get real momentum for 2016. I hope...

Yeah, sort of like if you move out of the US and plant roots on Canada, you'll be immune from all of the crap that our politicians are doing. While I dislike that companies are even discussing ideas like this, I will reserve judgement until they actually implement such a thing. As innovators...

Aside from my disappointment with him (like Rand) being there to support such a room full of ignorance, I can't agree with the negativity about his presentation. Yes, he's an actor - but actors are often quite different than what you'd expect when you see them outside their craft. What you...

Fourth? Maybe you didn't hear, but Ron Paul is the only one to have a plurality on 5 states delegates other than Romney, that sets him in front of Santorum and the chubby guy. There are rules in place that Ron Paul and his delegates were shooting for, which have been systematically pulled out...

Is it just me being more aware of the word "manifesto" since Ron Paul used it as part of the title of his book, or is it really being used way more frequently since then? Seems like there have been several books since then using it... at least a couple claiming to be about liberty.

As others have pointed out... it not only doesn't say anything about smart phones, it says nothing about prohibiting general video recording devices... Record to your hearts desires, so long as it isn't with a dedicated Camcorder or professional camera. I honestly don't think they care.

Apricots aren't illegal in this country either, yet people still die of cancer. Go Figure.