Invisible Man's latest activity

Here's a money-bomb proposal. Set aside some money for a donation to his campaign. And the trigger for the money bomb is when a Republican announces they are running against him in the primary. The day that announcement is made, everybody donate...

Is it really a conspiracy theory? Newt Gingrich became famous by giving speeches to empty congressional chambers just for the CSPAN cameras.

I'm glad to hear that. I would be even more glad it I didn't know that by tomorrow you're going to go right back to saying things like this:

No you don't. You just think you do because in your imagination the rest of your community will vote the same way you will. But the second they don't, you'll complain about how you shouldn't have to give into the will of the majority to let...

There exists such a thing as community. But not one that you get to control. All the other people in the community that you call yours have the same rights they do. They don't have a right to control whom you let onto your property, and you don't...

It sure sounds like he thinks he is. If he doesn't, he's free to clarify his view.

Exactly. Notice the difference between this view and the one AF espouses, where he gets to boss all his neighbors around like some kind of communist. Their property isn't theirs, but rather all part of his community.

But it's not "your" community. You own a limited amount of property, and all the property that belongs to everybody else around you that you consider "your" community is theirs, not yours. If you don't like who they allow onto their property, too...

Based on what? Based on what? But is the 14th Amendment right or wrong? If it's wrong, then simply being in the Constitution doesn't make it right. And if it's right, then on what basis is it right? And why would the same basis not apply to...

I have reasons for whom I allow into my home. But I do not exercise that same authority over the homes of any other people. I let them use their own reasons.

This reasoning makes sense to me. Put this way, it has nothing at all to do with whether a person is an illegal immigrant or natural born citizen.

Your position is ludicrous and ethically indefensible. But I respect that you're more consistent than other immigration restrictionists.

Because they're criminals. Their being foreign is irrelevant. It's just as reasonable to not want American citizen criminals in the country. Edit: Apply your reasoning to states. If it's completely reasonable for you not to want criminals from...

Why would their being an immigrant make any difference? If you don't need to know the background of another US citizen, why do you need to know the background of an immigrant?

It's discouraging to see this number is as low as 5 percent.