I fear you are right, when the shit hits the fan it's gonna be bad over here. The fact that I know personally pretty much the entire libertarian community over here says a lot. :(
But still, drinking age is 18 here but 21 in America. ;)
The vast majority of UKIP members are opposed to non-interventionism as well. That, their opposition to the gold standard, authoritarianism on civil liberties and desire for completely closed borders is what put me off when I was trying to decide if they were libertarian enough for me to join...
I wouldn't go as far as saying UKIP is fascist, they certainly are the best of a horrible bunch. But that's just like saying Romney isn't as bad as Obama or vice versa. UKIP, despite their best efforts to pretend otherwise, are not a libertarian party. They want closed borders, state schools...
And also, UKIP are a statist party, comprised of BNP in Blazers, old school Thatcherites and Hannan type conservatives. They are only marginally better than the Conservative Party.
Furthermore, UKIP did have a little success recently, but they generally fluctuate at around 6% so you saying...
Why are you lumping these people in the same category? They each have very different views, positions and audiences.
Also, I find it very hypocritical of you to claim some people involved in the liberty movement are trying to divide people, when such a statement is nothing but divisive itself.
Then NH would be a great choice because members of the FSP will help you settle in, besides, you'll be at college - plenty of people at college to hang around with. :)
Well if anyone is moving for liberty purposes I can't see any logic in choosing anywhere but New Hampshire. The FSP is well established and there is a reason NH was selected. The fact that over 1,000 activists have already moved there also makes a big difference.
I can see why people would...