She could attack it on first amendment grouds. Statutorially (meaning how the statute is written) I think there would be a convinction on "engages in offensive, obscene, abusive, boisterous, or noisy conduct or in offensive, obscene, or abusive...
If you listen closely, you can hear the rustling feathers of chickens coming home to roost:
https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/f-thieves.423251/page-14#post-7328475