Why do I have to treat insane positions as valid?
This is the same exact problem as in the Holocaust Denial thread a couple of months ago. People keep demanding that I watch these stupid videos and read these crackpot articles and somehow treat them as legitimate.
You can't argue with...
In case you're wondering what the point of that last post was, it was to show that gary null's list is questionable. I wonder how many of those "supporters" were misquoted and gary nulls makes them seem like they are AIDS denialists.
My link beats your link! :P
http://www.quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/null.html
A Critical Look at Gary Null's Activities and Credentials
Stephen Barrett, M.D.
Gary Null (1945– ) is one of the nation's leading promoters of dubious treatment for serious disease. He hosts radio and...
From wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_and_AIDS_misconceptions#AZT_and_other_antiretroviral_drugs.2C_not_HIV.2C_cause_AIDS
The vast majority of people with AIDS never received antiretroviral drugs, including those in developed countries prior to the licensure of AZT in 1987. Still...
Dannno you're not doing much of a better job at "substance". You and your friends use as "evidence" two videos by these "credible" scientists who's opinions are debunked.
Hell even a guy who posted actual substance earlier wasn't apparently not enough for you.
I could pull any article from this website and you'll shoot it down just because it doesn't agree with your crazy belief that there is no proof of an AIDS-HIV connection. http://www.aidstruth.org/new/
Because it's a waste of time arguing with delusional people like you. I've pointed how your "evidence" is questionable. I've pointed out that two scientists does NOT validate your beliefs. I've pointed out how the Bohemian grove video was unreliable.
But that doesn't matter to you. The truth...