Would you rather have Hillary?

[jgmaynard]

Here's the line I intend to use now that Ron will be the only Republican able to compete financially with Hillary. Use or adapt as needed:

Ron Paul already has over $18 million dollars raised so far this quarter. He will almost certainly raise $20 million or more by the end of the month.
The other Republican candidates will likely raise just half that amount. Meanwhile, Hillary and Obama will most likely raise about $20 million dollars.

NO other Republican can outspend Hillary. Only Ron Paul has enough fundraising to keep Clinton our of office.

A vote for any Republican other than Ron Paul is a vote for Hillary.

JM

 

[Satyricon]

I'm sure this has been discussed here frequently, but I think a lot of these neocon lunatics would rather see Hillary than Ron Paul, as scary as that is.

They know at least Hillary can be shaped by the neocon agenda, not entirely, but certainly more than they could ever influence RP. This is why Faux News has been so respectful (and at times even praising) of her.

 

[mortepa]

I'm sure this has been discussed here frequently, but I think a lot of these neocon lunatics would rather see Hillary than Ron Paul, as scary as that is.

They know at least Hillary can be shaped by the neocon agenda, not entirely, but certainly more than they could ever influence RP. This is why Faux News has been so respectful (and at times even praising) of her.

You are right. If it wasn't for her socialist healthcare plan, she would be more republican than Giuliani ot even Huckabee in many ways.

 

[Lois]

The neocons want Hillary -- she's one of them. Both parties are full of neocons.

 

[jgmaynard]

I'm willing to beat there are still a bunch of people who would rather have ANYONE with an R next to their name in the WH rather than Hillary.

JM