I'm normally in the fray of the Ron Paul threads on fark. The thing is that no matter what the headline or article is, every thread is the same. As far as poster breakdown goes, about 50% of the people like Ron, 20% disagree for respectable reasons, 27% dislike him for stupid reasons like the newsletter from 15 years ago, and 3% are straight up trolls who spend every single waking moment digging through blogs for things to criticise him for.
Fark Ron Paul trolls:
schrodinger, who is the king trolls. Every single post takes this format:
"selectively quote text from someone else. make claims originating from the belief that everything about ron paul is bad, with evidence cherry picked to justify. repeat ad infinitum"
harry pooter, who I suspect just gets kicks out of pissing off RP supporters. He mostly just borrows schrodingers material, but occasionally throws in a truly silly new ones.
tatsuma is a new one in recent weeks. His historical role in fark threads is to appear in any thread that has something to do with israel, and constantly post defending said country from all criticism. These are the only threads i've ever seen him post in and it's pretty much his entire fark identity. He has now started vigorously attacking Ron in threads with schrodinger like ferocity and intellectual dishonesty. Naturally, people accuse him of doing so because ron paul wants to stop subsidising israel and pull out of the middle east, and I tend to agree.
If you're gonna post in a ron paul thread on fark, ignore these three people no matter how much you disagree. Just state who you support and why and be done with it; don't take the bait.