Where is the organizing

[bite_me_MSM]

body for the proposed June 21 rally.

I'm sure there some central organization for it, but all I can find is tons of bits.

Help is appreciated

 

[bite_me_MSM]

I hate to

reply to my own post, but any takers here.

 

[Agent CSL]

revolutionmarch.com

You can sign up to offer help for jobs. Their website goes down sometimes, though.

 

[sidster]

Hmm... if anyone knows the people responsible for this web-site, it would
be nice to inform them that they shouldn't try to combat disinformation
with disinformation.

This is the first thing that caught my eyes on their page:

People Are Misinformed

In New Hampshire, 44% of Republicans who DISAPPROVE of the war in Iraq voted for John McCain! [View Source] They believe that he is the candidate to get us out of Iraq. We all know that McCain has said he would keep us there for 100 years. [View Source] We also know that there is only one Presidential candidate proposing a radical change to our foreign policy.

The fact is, we all know that McCain didn't talk about having US troops
in Iraq for continual fighting the "war" for 100 years, but he actually meant
keeping our presents in Iraq just as we have in Japan, Korea, etc ...

You lose so much credibility when you spread disinformation like this and claim
to want to "inform" the "public".

:shakes head:

 

[Banana]

Hmm... if anyone knows the people responsible for this web-site, it would
be nice to inform them that they shouldn't try to combat disinformation
with disinformation.

...

....
We all know that McCain has said he would keep us there for 100 years. [View Source]
....

The fact is, we all know that McCain didn't talk about having US troops
in Iraq for continual fighting the "war" for 100 years, but he actually meant
keeping our presents in Iraq just as we have in Japan, Korea, etc ...

Seems to me RevolutionMarch.com and you are in agreement...

 

[sidster]

Hmm... if anyone knows the people responsible for this web-site, it would
be nice to inform them that they shouldn't try to combat disinformation
with disinformation.

...

....
We all know that McCain has said he would keep us there for 100 years. [View Source]
....

The fact is, we all know that McCain didn't talk about having US troops
in Iraq for continual fighting the "war" for 100 years, but he actually meant
keeping our presents in Iraq just as we have in Japan, Korea, etc ...

Seems to me RevolutionMarch.com and you are in agreement...

Yet another dirty trick that I keep seeing used by supposed Ron Paul
supporters: Misquoting people or quoting people out of context.

Shame on you.

 

[Banana]

Yet another dirty trick that I keep seeing used by supposed Ron Paul
supporters: Misquoting people or quoting people out of context.

Shame on you.

....


Nice attitude there.

You can see for yourself that I didn't alter the quotation; all I did was omit some of the post to make a post point, namely that they didn't explicitly say McCain want to go war with Iraq for 100, only to "keep us there for 100 years", which seem to be in agreement with your post.

But whatever. Attacking a person is much more fun, no?

 

[Agent CSL]

We're all here for the same reasons. Try to keep arguing to your PM system, at least.

 

[sidster]

....


Nice attitude there.

You can see for yourself that I didn't alter the quotation; all I did was omit some of the post to make a post, namely that they didn't explicitly say McCain want to go war with Iraq for 100, only to "keep us there for 100 years", which seem to be in agreement with your post.

But whatever. Attacking a person is much more fun, no?

You changed the context of the quote from web-site to make it "agree"
with what McCain actually meant.

This was clearly not the intention of the web-site. Their wording was
crafted to misinform the reader about McCain's quote.

There is no doubt that McCain views on the Iraq war and Ron Paul's
are on opposite ends. But to represents McCain's quote to further
your cause does not make it OK, even if "your cause" is good one.

(note, here "your" and "you" used in general form, no specifically
addressing the reader or Banana)