I think the writer of that article doesn't know history, doesn't know Thomas Jefferson, and doesn't have a clue as to how fractional reserve banking and central banks actually operate. It's a heavily clouded opinion piece.
The writer's perception is that since central banking didn't take hold in the US for 73 years, it suffered an economic slowdown; my perception would be that the US economy was moving at a natural rate, not an artificially boosted and manipulated one.
It would be extremely interesting to research how the US economy would have fared if it had gone back to a gold standard and stayed on it to the present day, compared to what we have now, taking into account fluctuations in the gold and silver markets.