Washington Post Asks Ron Paul if He's Too Angry to be President

[Mortikhi]

RP's answer:
"I certainly don't want to come across angry," he said, "although I do get pretty annoyed when I see blatant abuse of the rule of law and blatant ignoring of the Constitution and that is annoying because I see the republic fading away."

http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2007/10/washington-post-interview-i-certainly-dont-want-to.html

 

[Adamsa]

I think he needs to show some anger every once in a while like that, although Ron didn't come across as angry to me, he is too nice.

 

[anewvoice]

If Ron Paul registers as angry, there is no word to describe me or the people I talk to.

 

[Tin_Foil_Hat]

He answered that just right!

 

[American]

WOW, our country is being taken away from us, we are going into needless wars, almost broke and Ron Paul is to angry?

Certainly going to war with a sovereign country for real reason is much more "angry" then anyone else running. Really reaching here....damn

 

[Kuldebar]

Yeah, you can pledge to "double Guantanamo", nuke Iran and advocate "enhanced interrogation techniques" but never ever show any outrage over the insanity of those around you...that might make you "unfit" to be President.

 

[Mortikhi]

Vid:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2007/10/11/VI2007101101200.html