rightwinghour
Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 42
I'm reading "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" and on page 108 something caught my eye. He was talking about how the vote went on the Iraq war resolution, and he said no Republican in the House of Representatives voted against it. I had to read it twice to make sure my eyes were deceiving me. How could Bugliosi get this wrong? Ron Paul and six others voted against the Iraq war resolution. This is public knowledge, not top secret stuff. In my opinion, a simple error like this puts a cloud of doubt over the rest of the book. Did he do his research properly, or did he let someone else do it for him? Did he double check all of his facts? Makes me wonder, even though I do think Bush should be prosecuted after he leaves office.