• Welcome to our new home!

    Please share any thoughts or issues here.


U.S. Life Expectancy Hits New High

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
U.S. Life Expectancy Hits New High


Steven J. DuBord | The New American
August 21, 2009


In 2007, U.S. life expectancy reached an all-time high of 77.9 years, up from 77.7 in 2006. The National Center for Health Statistics compiled the data based on almost 90 percent of the death certificates filed in the United States.

“Life expectancy in the United States has been on the rise for a decade, increasing 1.4 years — from 76.5 years in 1997 to 77.9 in 2007, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” an August 19 New York Times article reported. Not only are people gaining more years, they are enjoying more of those years in better health.

“The most noteworthy aspect about all this is not just that people are living longer but living better,” said Dr. Gary Kennedy, director of geriatric psychiatry at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, New York. “At the same time, people are living a longer active lifespan. Seniors are healthier, more active and economically better off than they ever have been.” Both men and women are living longer, but women still outlive men by roughly five years. As of 2007, women had an average life expectancy of 80.4 years, while men only reached 75.3 years. On the bright side, men are catching up. Back in 1979, women were outliving men by almost eight years.

Dr. Kennedy does caution that the data come from before the economic downturn, and the tough times since 2007 could have a negative impact on health and life expectancy. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we see differences in the future because of the economic stress people are under,” Kennedy said. “It’s good news now, but there could be some painful realities ahead.”

Not only that, but the World Health Organization still puts U.S. life expectancy behind many other countries. By WHO’s count, 14 other countries enjoy longer life spans of at least 81 years, among them Japan at 83; Australia and Italy at 82; and France, Israel, Singapore, and Spain at 81. These may not be related to better healthcare but to other factors such as the United States' higher violent-crime rate, greater numbers of those who drink to excess (including as drunk drivers), more persons who smoke, more people traveling greater distances on a regular basis, and subtle factors such as a high divorce rate.

Overall, the U.S. death rate continues to drop. In 2007, for every 100,000 in population, there were 760.3 deaths, down from 776.5 in 2006. Also, there were 2,269 fewer deaths in the United States in 2007 than in 2006. Of all U.S. deaths in 2007, 48.5 percent were from heart disease and cancer, but fewer people overall died from heart disease-related problems such as stroke, diabetes, and high blood pressure.

As for the leading causes of death, eight of them saw drops in mortality rates. In 2007, 8.4 percent fewer people died of influenza and pneumonia, 6.5 percent fewer from homicide, 5 percent fewer from accidents, 4.7 percent fewer from heart disease, 4.6 percent fewer from stroke, 3.9 percent fewer from diabetes, 2.7 percent fewer from hypertension, and 1.8 percent fewer from cancer.

For all the talk of America’s healthcare problems, these improvements are reminders that things aren’t as bad as they are being portrayed. They have all taken place without government being in charge of healthcare, and Americans should be leery of any healthcare reform proposal that would give government more control.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/1703
 
Tangent-but-related subject: In UHC debates, I always wince when single payer advocates use average life span as a testament of success for the single payer health care system. Normal diets vary per one's country custom, for instance, France drink more wine than we do, and the blood thins from this habit, which makes them less susceptible to heart attacks. They aren't less susceptible because the government pays for their health care.
 
Are you sure you want to tie government health programs to US life expectancy and then brag about the situation here? When you look at the actual factual data stripped of ideology and political leanings it is very difficult to make any sort of case for that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy

The USA ranks #50 in life expectancy according to this data. We are just ahead of Albania and China. 49 other places, many with government run health programs, are ahead of us, many far ahead of us.
 
If you remove obesity, murders, and car accidents (all of which the USA has a high number of) we live longer than any other country on earth.

There are several problems left in our society still. One, we still ignore the fact that much of our diet consists of food much lower in nutritional value than decades before. We are to believe that all these food additives, hormones, preservatives, tap water additives, and genetically modified foods don't hurt our health. Look at Ciggs for a minute. Smoke one today, are you sick? are your lungs falling out? Are your lungs black? No! Question, why? Answer, because your body has not been exposed to those harmful ingredients enough for them to build up inside of your body. It takes many years but these toxins build up. Then you get lung cancer, throat cancer, etc. Heating or freezing food excessively will literally break down the nutritional molecules into I guess you could call "plasma" or just gunk your body can't use. (Be careful of microwaves and try not freezing foods.)

Question, What is the number one growing epidemic in the USA? Answer, diabetes.
Question, What is one of the other top epidemics? Answer, obesity.
Question, What causes diabetes and obesity? Sugary fatty foods.
Question, What is the number one ingredient in all products in our food? Answer, high fructose corn syrup.
Question, When have all these disease come about? Have they been around for centuries? Answer, no. Most of them are new and related to our bodies being clogged with the gunk we ingest.

If you remove these unnatural things from your diet I believe we would all live at least a decade longer and in much better health.

In the article above what all do they base living longer and living better on? What is it compared too?

People talk about preventive care so you will prevent major health problems later on in your life. I think that step one is making sure you are eating all organic substances getting sun light and some sort of regular exercise mentally and physically.

Accidents and health problems will still exist. For these problems we need hospitals, doctors, and physicians etc etc to compete for your business. Paying a monthly salary to the Gov. or Insurance company means almost all people don't care about looking at prices of hospitals. So they can charge much higher prices and your premiums will go up. The FDA and government regulations need to get out of the way so more of the money people spend go to their health. Deregulation and allowing health insurance through other states will cause prices to go down and be much more affordable (this is the effect of competition).
 
from hotbrownsauce

If you remove obesity, murders, and car accidents (all of which the USA has a high number of) we live longer than any other country on earth.

Really?!?!?!? As someone who works in the medical profession I have never seen any objective source of information which makes this claim. Do you have data which supports this claim? To do this you would also have to remove all deaths due to those factors - obesity, murders and car accidents from the other countries as well. And what would be the point in doing that? What would that prove anyways?

Obesity is a health problem. Why would you remove it?
 
from hotbrownsauce



Really?!?!?!? As someone who works in the medical profession I have never seen any objective source of information which makes this claim. Do you have data which supports this claim? To do this you would also have to remove all deaths due to those factors - obesity, murders and car accidents from the other countries as well. And what would be the point in doing that? What would that prove anyways?

Obesity is a health problem. Why would you remove it?

It may be a health problem, but removing it would allow for a more accurate comparison between the actual performance of various healthcare systems. As it stands, the life expectancy rates are more of a comparison between cultures than healthcare systems, yet dishonest (or gullible) people seem to be claiming otherwise.
 
Back
Top