Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 115,405
Why is SPR oil going to China?
Because Biden wants China to be an economic powerhouse instead of the US.
Globalism.
This would not be a popular discussion with beltway libertarians, but should there be any limits on commoditizing and selling everything possible globally? This is the essential question. Should US oil be exported until the price equalizes globally? Why should an ounce of oil be refined and sold in the US if another nation such as China is willing to pay a penny more per barrel?
This question intertwines with politics. What kind of arrangements (and laws and regulations) can be made? What kind of punishments can the industry impose if they are not happy? What kind of punishments can the government impose if they are not happy? And inevitably, it’s the consumers who suffer when punishments are being handed out.
I've seen articles about this. But none of them said anything about what price this oil is being sold at. Is it just being sold at the market price? Or is this some kind of subsidy to China?
If it's being sold at the market price, then what difference does it make who the specific buyers of it are?
It's the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It was bought and set aside at taxpayer expense after WWII for the specific purpose of enabling us to sustain a war against a Communist country--specifically, either one of two particular Communist countries--in that eventuality.
That is what difference it makes who the specific buyer is.
The oil market is a global market. It's a fungible commodity. If you increase the supply, it lowers the price. The supply goes up everywhere, and the price goes down everywhere.
You can't say, "These particular barrels of oil over here will get sold in the US so that we can just lower the price there."
I've seen articles about this. But none of them said anything about what price this oil is being sold at. Is it just being sold at the market price? Or is this some kind of subsidy to China?
If it's being sold at the market price, then what difference does it make who the specific buyers of it are?
I don't see how that makes any difference.
If they just sold that oil to buyers in the US, and then that freed up private oil companies to increase the number of barrels they sold in China instead of the US by the same amount, the end result is the same isn't it?
It's like, if you're trying to make the water in a pool deeper in the deep end, you don't have to pour the new water in the deep end. No matter where you pour the water, the whole pool gets deeper.
“Abeltwaylibertarian would say!”
“A beltway libertarian would say!”
I don't see how that makes any difference.
If they just sold that oil to buyers in the US, and then that freed up private oil companies to increase the number of barrels they sold in China instead of the US by the same amount, the end result is the same isn't it?
It's like, if you're trying to make the water in a pool deeper in the deep end, you don't have to pour the new water in the deep end. No matter where you pour the water, the whole pool gets deeper.
If I'm reading these reports correctly, it appears that the SPR oil was "bundled" in large trades of mixed crudes, including "crud" crude like Venezuelan Orinoco Heavy, thus not only reducing the price to our enemy, but providing the Chi-Coms with a valuable source of light, sweet crude.
If this is the case, and it was thus sold at lower than the market price, then that is the crucial factor.
In any case, it ensures that particular market sees some of that commodity.
It's a pretty damned crucial factor regardless of the price at which it was sold, Beltway "Libertarian".